Cytogenetic confirmation of a positive NIPT result: evidence-based choice between chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis depending on chromosome aberration

References

• Bianchi DW, Wilkins-Haug L. Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road? Clin Chem. 2014;60(1):78–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayindir B, Dehaspe L, Brison N, et al. Noninvasive prenatal testing using a novel analysis pipeline to screen for all autosomal fetal aneuploidies improves pregnancy management. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23(10):1286–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Jiang FM, Stevenson RJ, et al. Secondary findings from non-invasive prenatal testing for common fetal aneuploidies by whole genome sequencing as a clinical service. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(6):602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil MM, Quezada MS, Revello R, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):249–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Opstal D, Srebniak MI, Polak J, et al. False negative NIPT results: risk figures for chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 based on chorionic villi results in 5967 cases and literature review. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady P, Brison N, Van Den Bogaert K, et al. Clinical implementation of NIPT - technical and biological challenges. Clin Genet. 2015.doi:10.1111/cge.12598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faas BH, De Ligt J, Janssen I, et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies using massively parallel sequencing-by-ligation and evidence that cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma originates from cytotrophoblastic cells. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12(Suppl 1): S19–S26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srebniak MI, Diderich KE, Noomen P, et al. Abnormal non-invasive prenatal test results concordant with karyotype of cytotrophoblast but not reflecting abnormal fetal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(1):109–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalousek DK, Dill FJ. Chromosomal mosaicism confined to the placenta in human conceptions. Science. 1983;221(4611):665–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flori E, Doray B, Gautier E, et al. Circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal serum appears to originate from cyto- and syncytio-trophoblastic cells. Case report. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(3):723–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los FJ, Van Den Berg C, Van Opstal D, et al. Abnormal karyotypes in semi-direct chorionic villus preparations of women with different cytogenetic risks. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(10):1023–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondorp W, De Wert G, Bombard Y, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Summary and recommendations. Eur J Hum Genet. Advanced online publication. 2015 Apr 1; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp C, Papp Z. Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: what are the risks in current practice? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(2):159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los FJ, Van Den Berg C, Wildschut HI, et al. The diagnostic performance of cytogenetic investigation in amniotic fluid cells and chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21(13):1150–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibas LM, Grujic S, Barr MA, et al. A simple technique for obtaining high quality chromosome preparations from chorionic villus samples using FdU synchronization. Prenat Diagn. 1987;7(5):323–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidt-Jensen S, Christensen B, Lind AM. Chorionic villus culture for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome defects: reduction of the long-term cultivation time. Prenat Diagn. 1989;9(5):309–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JP, Cheung SW. An embryogenic model to explain cytogenetic inconsistencies observed in chorionic villus versus fetal tissue. Prenat Diagn. 1988;8(2):119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi DW, Wilkins-Haug LE, Enders AC, et al. Origin of extraembryonic mesoderm in experimental animals: relevance to chorionic mosaicism in humans. Am J Med Genet. 1993;46(5):542–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittalis MC, Dalpra L, Torricelli F, et al. The predictive value of cytogenetic diagnosis after CVS based on 4860 cases with both direct and culture methods. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14(4):267–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme J. Confined placental mosaicism for trisomies 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 16, and 22: their incidence, likely origins, and mechanisms for cell lineage compartmentalization. Prenat Diagn. 1996;16(6):511–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia P, Baroncini A, Mattarozzi A, et al. Cytogenetic follow-up of chromosomal mosaicism detected in first-trimester prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(8):739–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)–diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986–1992. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17(9):801–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. European collaborative research on mosaicism in CVS (EUCROMIC)–fetal and extrafetal cell lineages in 192 gestations with CVS mosaicism involving single autosomal trisomy. Am J Med Genet. 1997;70(2):179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karampetsou E, Morrogh D, Ballard T, et al. Confined placental mosaicism: implications for fetal chromosomal analysis using microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(1):98–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooper AJ, Faas BH. Comment on ‘confined placental mosaicism: implications for fetal chromosomal analysis using microarray comparative genomic hybridization’. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(8):815–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European cytogenetic guidelines. E.C.A.–European Cytogenetics Association Newsletter. 2012 Jul;30:11–19. Available from: http://www.e-c-a.eu/files/downloads/Guidelines/Specific_Constitutional_Guidelines_NL30.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ACC CVS database 2005. [Internet]. [cited 2005 Nov 4]. Available from: http://acccvs.ncl.ac.uk//.
   Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme J, Emslie JB, Connors S. Association of clinical cytogeneticists chorion villus sampling database 1987–2000. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(5):420–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grati FR, Grimi B, Frascoli G, et al. Confirmation of mosaicism and uniparental disomy in amniocytes, after detection of mosaic chromosome abnormalities in chorionic villi. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14(3):282–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grati FR, Malvestiti F, Ferreira JC, et al. Fetoplacental mosaicism: potential implications for false-positive and false-negative noninvasive prenatal screening results. Genet Med. 2014;16(8):620–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Opstal D, Van Den Berg C, Galjaard RJ, et al. Follow-up investigations in uncultured amniotic fluid cells after uncertain cytogenetic results. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21(2):75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grati FR, Bajaj K, Malvestiti F, et al. The type of feto-placental aneuploidy detected by cfDNA testing may influence the choice of confirmatory diagnostic procedure. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(10):994–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Polak-Knook J, et al. (Potential) false-negative diagnoses in chorionic villi and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(5):401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K, Hills A, Donaghue C, et al. Quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis of >40,000 prenatal samples for the rapid diagnosis of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and monosomy X. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(12):1197–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlin LK, Thiel BD, Bonnemann CG, et al. Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(7):1263–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith K, Lowther G, Maher E, et al. The predictive value of findings of the common aneuploidies, trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and numerical sex chromosome abnormalities at CVS: experience from the ACC U.K. Collaborative study. Association of clinical cytogeneticists prenatal diagnosis working party. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19(9):817–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen Y, Tian F, et al. Maternal mosaicism is a significant contributor to discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing. Clin Chem. 2014;60(1):251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalousek DK, Howard-Peebles PN, Olson SB, et al. Confirmation of CVS mosaicism in term placentae and high frequency of intrauterine growth retardation association with confined placental mosaicism. Prenat Diagn. 1991;11(10):743–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg JD, Porter AE, Golbus MS. Current assessment of fetal losses as a direct consequence of chorionic villus sampling. Am J Med Genet. 1990;35(2):174–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson A, Wapner RJ, Davis GH, et al. Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an association with poor perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(4):573–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Opstal D, Van Den Berg C, Deelen WH, et al. Prospective prenatal investigations on potential uniparental disomy in cases of confined placental trisomy. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(1):35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuring-Blom GH, Keijzer M, Jakobs ME, et al. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of term placentae suspected of mosaicism using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn. 1993;13(8):671–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amant F, Verheecke M, Wlodarska I, et al. Presymptomatic identification of cancers in pregnant women during noninvasive prenatal testing. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(6):814–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenromp MJ, Christiaens GC, Van Den Bout J, et al. Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: a cross-sectional study. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25(3):253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, et al. Accuracy of abnormal karyotypes after the analysis of both short- and long-term culture of chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(12):956–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straver R, Sistermans EA, Holstege H, et al. WISECONDOR: detection of fetal aberrations from shallow sequencing maternal plasma based on a within-sample comparison scheme. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(5):e31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straver R, Sistermans EA, Reinders MJ. Introducing WISECONDOR for noninvasive prenatal diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014;14(5):513–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar