Next revolution in the molecular theranostics of infectious diseases: microfabricated systems for personalized medicine

References

• Cohen ML. Changing patterns of infectious disease. Nature406(6797), 762–767 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell NJC. Examining unmet needs in infectious disease. Drug Discov. Today8(1), 22–30 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Nature430(6996), 242–249 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauci AS. Emerging infectious diseases – a clear and present danger to humanity. JAMA292(15), 1887–1888 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Picard FJ, Bergeron MG. Rapid molecular theranostics in infectious diseases. Drug Discov. Today7(21) 1092–1100 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissinot M, Bergeron MG. Toward rapid real-time molecular diagnostic to guide smart use of antimicrobials. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.5(5), 478–482 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGowan JE Jr, Tenover FC. Confronting bacterial resistance in healthcare settings: a crucial role for microbiologists. Nature Rev. Microbiol.2(3), 251–258 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versalovic J, Lupski JR. Molecular detection and genotyping of pathogens: more accurate and rapid answers. Trends Microbiol.10(10 Suppl.), S15–S21 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenollar F, Raoult D. Molecular genetic methods for the diagnosis of fastidious microorganisms. APMIS112(11–12), 785–807 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackay IM. Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10(3), 190–212 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RPH, van Agtmael MA, Danner SA, Savelkoul PHM, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE. New developments in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections. Lancet Infect. Dis.4(12), 751–760 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raoult D, Fournier PE, Drancourt M. What does the future hold for clinical microbiology? Nature Rev. Microbiol.2(2), 151–159 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Rothman RE. PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect. Dis.4(6), 337–348 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothershed EA, Whitney AM. Nucleic acid-based methods for the detection of bacterial pathogens: present and future considerations for the clinical laboratory. Clin. Chim. Acta363(1–2), 206–220 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanzadeh J. Preventing PCR amplification carryover contamination in a clinical laboratory. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.34(4), 389–396 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borst A, Box ATA, Fluit AC. False-positive results and contamination in nucleic acid amplification assays: suggestions for a prevent and destroy strategy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.23(4), 289–299 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefers S, Pei Z, Tang Y-W. False positives and false negatives encountered in diagnostic molecular microbiology. Rev. Med. Microbiol.16(2), 59–67 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Fortina P, Surrey S, Kricka LJ. Molecular diagnostics: hurdles for clinical implementation. Trends Mol. Med.8(6), 264–266 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardekani AM, Petricoin EF III, Hackett JL. Molecular diagnostics: an FDA perspective. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.3(2), 129–140 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron MG, Ke D, Ménard C et al. Rapid detection of group B streptococci in pregnant women at delivery. N. Engl. J. Med.343(3), 175–179 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huletsky A, Giroux R, Rossbach V et al. New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from speciments containing a mixture of staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol.42(5), 1875–1884 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan SD, Scott G, Tabrizian M. Toward resolving the challenge of sepsis diagnosis. Clin. Chem.50(8), 1301–1314 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korppi M. Mixed microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in children. APMIS110(7–8), 515–522 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DR. The microbiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir. Care50(6), 742–765 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneede P, Tenke P, Hofstetter AG, Members of the Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Working Group of the Health Care Office (HCO) of the European Association of Urology (EAU). Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) – a synoptic overview for urologists. Eur. Urol.44(1), 1–7 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan B. Sexually transmissible infections other than HIV. Lancet363(9408), 545–556 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant PA, Venter D, Robins-Browne R, Curtis N. Chips with everything: DNA microarrays in infectious diseases. Lancet Infect. Dis.4(2), 100–111 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loy A, Bodrossy L. Highly parallel microbial diagnostics using oligonucleotide microarrays. Clin. Chim. Acta363(1–2), 106–119 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann CA. The future of home testing – implications for traditional laboratories. Clin. Chim. Acta323(1–2), 31–36 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland CA, Kiechle FL. Point-of-care molecular diagnostic systems – past, present and future. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.8(5), 504–509 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabey D, Peeling RW, Ustianowski A, Perkins MD. Diagnostics for the developing world. Nature Rev. Microbiol.2(3), 231–240 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daar AS, Thorsteinsdóttir H, Martin DK, Smith AC, Nast S, Singer PA. Top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries. Nature Genet.32(2), 229–232 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ommen GJB, Bakker E, den Dunnen JT. The human genome project and the future of diagnostics, treatment, and prevention. Lancet354(Suppl. 1), 5–10 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLeod HL, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics: unlocking the human genome for better drug therapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.41, 101–121 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiratsuka M, Sasaki T, Mizugaki M. Genetic testing for pharmacogenetics and its clinical application in drug therapy. Clin. Chim. Acta363(1–2), 177–186 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayi FO, Sun H, Perry J. Adverse drug reactions: a review of relevant factors. J. Clin. Pharmacol.40(10), 1093–1101 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh D-C, Woodall BS, Shin S-K, Hermes-De Santis ER. Clinical and economic impact of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients. Ann. Pharmacother.34(12), 1373–1379 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein DB, Tate SK, Sisodiya SM. Pharmacogenetics goes genomic. Nature Rev. Genet.4(12), 937–947 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindpaintner K. Pharmacogenetics and the future of medical practice. J. Mol. Med.81(3), 141–153 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarson M. Pharmacogenetics of drug metabolising enzymes: importance for personalised medicine. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.41(4), 573–580 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans WE, Relling MV. Moving towards individualized medicine with pharmacogenomics. Nature429(6990), 464–468 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierz W. Challenge of personalized health care: to what extent is medicine already individualized and what are the future trends? Med. Sci. Monit.10(5), RA111–RA123 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higashi MK, Veenstra DL, Kondo LM et al. Association between CYP2C9 genetic variants and anticoagulation-related outcomes during warfarin therapy. JAMA287(13), 1690–1698 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzenbacher P, Anzenbacherová E. Cytochromes P450 and metabolism of xenobiotics. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.58(5–6), 737–747 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobstein R, Vecsler M, Kurnik D et al. Common genetic variants of microsomal epoxide hydrolase affect warfarin dose requirements beyond the effect of cytochrome P450 2C9. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.77(5), 365–372 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dresser GK, Spence JD, Bailey DG. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic consequences and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition. Clin. Pharmacokinet.38(1), 41–57 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhr U. Induction of drug metabolising enzymes. Clin. Pharmacokinet.38(6), 493–504 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izzo AA, Ernst E. Interactions between herbal medicines and prescribed drugs. Drugs61(15), 2163–2175 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S-M, Hall SD, Watkins P et al. Drug interactions with herbal products and grapefruit juice: a conference report. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.75(1), 1–12 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster BC, Arnason JT, Briggs CJ. Natural health products and drug disposition. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.45, 203–226 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park BK, Kitteringham NR, Maggs JL, Pirmohamed M, Williams DP. The role of metabolic activation in drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.45, 177–202 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell JM. Genetics and genomics in infectious disease susceptibility. Trends Mol. Med.7(11), 521–526 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schröder NWJ, Schumann RR. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptors and susceptibility to infectious disease. Lancet Infect. Dis.5(3), 156–164 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayney MS. Pharmacogenomics and infectious diseases: impact on drug response and applications to disease management. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.59(17), 1626–1631 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean M, Carrington M, O’Brien SJ. Balanced polymorphism selected by genetic versus infectious human disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.3, 263–292 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell JM, Goswami T, Evans CAW et al. SLC11A1 (formerly NRAMP1) and disease resistance. Cell. Microbiol.3(12), 773–784 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenhoff THM, Verreck FAW, Lichtenauer-Kaligis EGR, Hoeve MA, Sanal O, van Dissel JT. Genetics, cytokines and human infectious disease: lessons from weakly pathogenic mycobacteria and salmonellae. Nature Genet.32(1), 97–105 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van de Vosse E, Hoeve MA, Ottenhoff THM. Human genetics of intracellular infectious diseases: molecular and cellular immunity against mycobacteria and salmonellae. Lancet Infect. Dis.4(12), 739–749 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans WE, Relling MV. Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics. Science286(5439), 487–491 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JS, Ginsburg GS. Integrating diagnostics and therapeutics: revolutionizing drug discovery and patient care. Drug Discov. Today7(16), 859–864 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JA. Pharmacogenetics: potential for individualized drug therapy through genetics. Trends Genet.19(11), 660–666 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesko LJ, Woodcock J. Translation of pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics: a regulatory perspective. Nature Rev. Drug Discov.3(9), 763–769 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzig-Schippers, Tomalik-Scharte D, Jetter A et al. Should we use N-acetyltransferase type 2 genotyping to personalize isoniazid doses? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(5), 1733–1738 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S. Market outlook for IVDs. IVD Technol.10(7), 39–43 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnström R. Miniaturization and integration: challenges and breakthroughs in microfluidics. Lab Chip2(2), 26N–30N (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Verpoorte E. Microfluidic chips for clinical and forensic analysis. Electrophoresis23(5), 677–712 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton MJ. CD simplicity. Anal. Chem.75(13), 302A–306A (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Huikko K, Kostiainen R, Kotiaho T. Introduction to micro-analytical systems: bioanalytical and pharmaceutical applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.20(2), 159–171 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Erickson D, Li D. Integrated microfluidic devices. Anal. Chim. Acta507(1), 11–26 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascoyne P, Satayavivad J, Ruchirawat M. Microfluidic approaches to malaria detection. Acta Trop.89(3), 357–369 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gui L, Liu J. Ice valve for a mini/micro flow channel. J. Micromech. Microeng.14(2), 242–246 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Lee SY. Micro total analysis system (µ-TAS) in biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.64(3), 289–299 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vilkner T, Janasek D, Manz A. Micro total analysis systems. Recent developments. Anal. Chem.76(12), 3373–3386 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Wang J, Qian S, Bau HH. Thermally-actuated, phase change flow control for microfluidic systems. Lab Chip5(11), 1277–1285 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kricka LJ, Park JY, Li SFY, Fortina P. Miniaturized detection technology in molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.5(4), 549–559 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furdui VI, Harrison DJ. Immunomagnetic T cell capture from blood for PCR analysis using microfluidic systems. Lab Chip4(6), 614–618 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Mello AJ, Beard N. Dealing with ‘real’ samples: sample pre-treatment in microfluidic systems. Lab Chip3(1), 11N–19N (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu H, Ho P-L, Tsang KWT, Wang L, Xu B. Using biofunctional magnetic nanoparticles to capture vancomycin-resistant enterococci and other Gram-positive bacteria at ultralow concentration. J. Am. Chem. Soc.125(51), 15702–15703 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T, Geng T, Sturgis J et al. Lysozyme for capture of microorganisms on protein biochips. Enzyme Microb. Technol.33(7), 958–966 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kist TBL, Mandaji M. Separation of biomolecules using electrophoresis and nanostructures. Electrophoresis25(21–22), 3492–3497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofmann O, Murray K, Wilkinson A-S, Cox T, Manz A. Laser induced disruption of bacterial spores on a microchip. Lab Chip5(4), 374–377 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim J, Jang SH, Jia G, Zoval JV, Da Silva NA, Madou MJ. Cell lysis on a microfluidic CD (compact disc). Lab Chip4(5), 516–522 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breadmore MC, Wolfe KA, Arcibal IG et al. Microchip-based purification of DNA from biological samples. Anal. Chem.75(8), 1880–1886 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung Y-C, Jan M-S, Lin Y-C, Lin J-H, Cheng W-C, Fan C-Y. Microfluidic chip for high efficiency DNA extraction. Lab Chip4(2), 141–147 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson DS. Solid supports for micro analytical systems. Lab Chip5(2), 132–139 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atencia J, Beebe DJ. Controlled microfluidic interfaces. Nature437(7059), 648–655 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse J, Wechselberger C, Sonnleitner M, Schindler H, Schultz GJ. Single-molecule reader for proteomics and genomics. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.782(1–2), 127–135 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Z, Qian S, Abrams WR, Malamud D, Bau HH. Thermosiphon-based PCR reactor: experiment and modeling. Anal. Chem.76(13), 3707–3715 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Chen P-C, Mitchell MW, Nikitopoulos DE, Soper SA, Murphy MC. Rapid PCR in a continuous flow device. Lab Chip4(6), 638–645 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D-S, Park SH, Yang H et al. Bulk-micromachined submicroliter-volume PCR chip with very rapid thermal response and low power consumption. Lab Chip4(4), 401–407 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee TM-H, Carles MC, Hsing I-M. Microfabricated PCR-electrochemical device for simultaneous DNA amplification and detection. Lab Chip3(2), 100–105 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kricka LJ, Wilding P. Microchip PCR. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.377(5), 820–825 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers JP. Molecular diagnostics on electrophoretic microchips. Anal. Chem.75(12), 2919–2927 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Fung Y, Lin B. DNA diagnosis by capillary electrophoresis and microfabricated electrophoretic devices. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.3(3), 387–394 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagally ET, Scherer JR, Blazej RG et al. Integrated portable genetic analysis microsystem for pathogen/infectious disease detection. Anal. Chem.76(11), 3162–3170 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu RH, Yang J, Lenigk R, Bonanno J, Grodzinski P. Self-contained, fully integrated biochip for sample preparation, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and DNA microarray detection. Anal. Chem.76(7), 1824–1831 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeid PJ, Christopoulos TK. Microfabricated systems for nucleic acid analysis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.41(5–6), 429–465 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Hupert ML, Murphy MC, Soper SA, Cheng Y-W, Barany F. Ligase detection reaction/hybridization assays using three-dimensional microfluidic networks for the detection of low-abundant DNA point mutations. Anal. Chem.77(10), 3243–3255 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulliksen A, Solli L, Karlsen F et al. Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification in nanoliter volumes. Anal. Chem.76(1), 9–14 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent M, Xu Y, Kong H. Helicase-dependent isothermal DNA amplification. EMBO Rep.5(8), 1–6 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan M, Ugaz VM, Burns MA. PCR in a Rayleigh–Bénard convection cell. Science298(5594), 793 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon R. Using DNA microarrays for diagnostic and prognostic prediction. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.3(5), 587–595 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petricoin EF III, Hackett JL, Lesko LJ et al. Medical applications of microarray technologies: a regulatory science perspective. Nature Genet.32(Suppl.), 474–479 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call DR. Challenges and opportunities for pathogen detection using DNA microarrays. Crit. Rev. Microbiol.31(2), 91–99 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes DR, Iossifidis D, Auroux P-A, Manz A. Micro total analysis systems. 1. Introduction, theory, and technology. Anal. Chem.74(12), 2623–2636 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao DS, Roy B, McCormick MT, Kuhr WG, Brazill SA. Rapid fabrication of a poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic capillary electrophoresis system utilizing high precision machining. Lab Chip3(2), 93–99 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiorini GS, Chiu DT. Disposable microfluidic devices: fabrication, function, and application. Biotechniques38(3), 429–446 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noerholm M, Bruus H, Jakobsen MH, Telleman P, Ramsing NB. Polymer microfluidic chip for online monitoring of microarray hybridizations. Lab Chip4(1), 28–37 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson D, Liu X, Venditti R, Li D, Krull UJ. Electrokinetically based approach for single-nucleotide polymorphism discrimination using a microfluidic device. Anal. Chem.77(13), 4000–4007 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peytavi R, Raymond FR, Gagné D et al. Microfluidic device for rapid (<15 min) automated microarray hybridization. Clin. Chem.51(10), 1836–1844 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenigk R, Liu RH, Athavale M et al. Plastic biochannel hybridization devices: a new concept for microfluidic DNA arrays. Anal. Biochem.311(1), 40–49 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung Y-C, Lin Y-C, Shiu M-Z, Chang W-NT. Microfluidic chip for fast nucleic hybridization. Lab Chip3(4), 228–233 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurtner C, Tu E, Jamshidi N et al. Microelectronic array devices and techniques for electric field enhanced DNA hybridization in low-conductance buffers. Electrophoresis23(10), 1543–1550 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barlaan EA, Sugimori M, Furukawa S, Takeuchi K. Electronic microarray analysis of 16S rDNA amplicons for bacterial detection. J. Biotechnol.115(1), 11–21 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu RH, Lenigk R, Druyor-Sanchez RL, Yang J, Grodzinski P. Hybridization enhancement using cavitation microstreaming. Anal. Chem.75(8), 1911–1917 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunbar SA, Vander Zee CA, Oliver KG, Karem KL, Jacobson JW. Quantitative, multiplexed detection of bacterial pathogens: DNA and protein application of the Luminex LabMAP™ system. J. Microbiol. Meth.53(2), 245–252 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler N, Ferraris O, Palmer K, Marsh W, Steel A. Use of the DNA Flow-Thru Chip, a three-dimensional biochip, for typing and subtyping of influenza viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol.42(5), 2173–2185 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shendure J, Mitra RD, Varma C, Church GM. Advanced sequencing technologies: methods and goals. Nature Rev. Genet.5(5), 335–344 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugaz VM, Elms RD, Lo RC, Shaikh FA, Burns MA. Microfabricated electrophoresis systems for DNA sequencing and genotyping applications: current technology and future directions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A362(1818), 1105–1129 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegenfeldt JO, Prinz C, Cao H et al. Micro- and nanofluidics for DNA analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.378(7), 1678–1692 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grow AE, Wood LL, Claycomb JL, Thompson PA. New biochip technology for label-free detection of pathogens and their toxins. J. Microbiol. Meth.53(2), 221–233 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiducci C, Stagni C, Zuccheri G et al. DNA detection by integrable electronics. Biosens. Bioelectron.19(8), 781–787 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uslu F, Ingebrandt S, Mayer D, Böcker-Meffert S, Odenthal M, Offenhausser A. Labelfree fully electronic nucleic acid detection system based on a field-effect transistor device. Biosens. Bioelectron.19(12), 1723–1731 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis F, Higson SPJ. Structured thin films as functional components within biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron.21(1), 1–20 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homola J, Vaisocherová H, Dostálek J, Piliarik M. Multi-analyte surface plasmon resonance biosensing. Methods37(1), 26–36 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doré K, Dubus S, Ho H-A et al. Fluorescent polymeric transducer for the rapid, simple, and specific detection of nucleic acids at the zeptomole level. J. Am. Chem. Soc.126(13), 4240–4244 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho HA, Leclerc M. Optical sensors based on hybrid aptamer/conjugated polymer complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.126(5), 1384–1387 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Bazan GC. Methods for strandjspecific DNA detection with cationic conjugated polymers suitable for incorporation into DNA chips and microarrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(3), 589–594 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond FR, Ho H-A, Peytavi R et al. Detection of target DNA using fluorescent cationic polymer and peptide nucleic acid probes on solid support. BMC Biotechnol.5, 10 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho HA, Doré K, Boissinot M et al. Direct molecular detection of nucleic acids by fluorescence signal amplification. J. Am. Chem. Soc.127(36), 12673–12676 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen KM, Thundat T. Microcantilever biosensors. Methods37(1), 57–64 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian F, Hansen KM, Ferrell TL, Thundat T. Dynamic microcantilever sensors for discerning biomolecular interactions. Anal. Chem.77(6), 1601–1606 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou D, Sinniah K, Abell C, Rayment T. Label-free detection of DNA hybridization at the nanoscale: a highly sensitive and selective approach using atomic-force microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.42(40), 4934–4937 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jain KK. Nanotechnology in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Clin. Chim. Acta358(1–2), 37–54 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bange A, Halsall HB, Heineman WR. Microfluidic immunosensor systems. Biosens. Bioelectron.20(12), 2488–2503 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taitt CR, Golden JP, Shubin YS et al. A portable array biosensor for detecting multiple analytes in complex samples. Microb. Ecol.47(2), 175–185 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espina V, Woohouse EC, Wulfkuhle J, Asmussen HD, Petricoin EF III, Liotta LA. Protein microarray detection strategies: focus on direct detection technologies. J. Immunol. Meth.290(1–2), 121–133 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krska R, Janotta M. Technology and applications of protein microarrays. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.379(3), 338–340 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertone B, Snyder M. Advances in functional protein microarray technology. FEBS J.272(21), 5400–5411 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuk JS, Ha K-S. Proteomic applications of surface plasmon resonance biosensors: analysis of protein arrays. Exp. Mol. Med.37(1), 1–10 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Sullivan CK. Aptasensors – the future of biosensing? Anal. Bioanal. Chem.372(1), 44–48 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jona G, Snyder M. Recent developments in analytical and functional protein microarrays. Curr. Opin. Mol. Therap.5(3), 271–277 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tombelli S, Minunni M, Mascini M. Analytical applications of aptamers. Biosens. Bioelectron.20(12), 2424–2434 (2005)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Lode P. Point-of-care immunotesting: approaching the analytical performance of central laboratory methods. Clin. Biochem.38(7), 591–606 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figeys D. Adapting arrays and lab-on-a-chip technology for proteomics. Proteomics2(4), 373–382 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai S, Wang S, Luo J, Lee J, Yang S-T, Madou MJ. Design of a compact disk-like microfluidic platform for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anal. Chem.76(7), 1832–1837 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FYH, Sabri M, Erickson D, Alizeraie J, Li D, Sherman PM. Development of a novel microfluidic immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. Analyst129(9), 823–828 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taitt CR, Anderson GP, Ligler FS. Evanescent wave fluorescence biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron.20(12), 2470–2487 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock C, Coleman M, Collins B et al. Photoaptamer arrays applied to multiplexed proteomic analysis. Proteomics4(3), 609–618 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proske D, Blank M, Buhmann R, Resch A. Aptamers – basic research, drug development, and clinical applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.69(4), 367–374 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu D, Xu D, Yu X, Liu Z, He W, Ma Z. Label-free electrochemical detection for aptamer-based array electrodes. Anal. Chem.77(16), 5107–5113 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto-Fujita R, Kumar PKR. Aptamer-derived nucleic acid oligos: applications to develop nucleic acid chips to analyze proteins and small ligands. Anal. Chem.77(17), 5460–5466 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disney MD, Seeberger PH. The use of carbohydrate microarrays to study carbohydrate-cell interactions and to detect pathogens. Chem. Biol.11(12), 1701–1707 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahal LK. Catching bacteria with sugar. Chem. Biol.11(12), 1602–1604 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratner DM, Adams EW, Disney MD, Seeberger PH. Tools for glycomics: mapping interactions of carbohydrates in biological systems. Chembiochem5(10), 1375–1383 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilobello KT, Krishnamoorthy L, Slawek D, Mahal LK. Development of a lectin microarray for the rapid analysis of protein glycopatterns. Chembiochem6(6), 985–989 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Lam KS. Protein and chemical microarrays – powerful tools for proteomics. J. Biomed. Biotechnol.2003(5), 257–266 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheehan PE, Whitman LJ. Detection limits for nanoscale biosensors. Nano Lett.5(4), 803–807 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K-B, Kim E-Y, Mirkin CA, Wolinsky SM. The use of nanoarrays for highly sensitive and selective detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in plasma. Nano Lett.4(10), 1869–1872 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettikadan SR, Johnson JC, Vengasandra SG, Muys J, Henderson E. ViriChip: a solid phase assay for detection and identification of viruses by atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology15(3), 383–389 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessner MJ, Meyer L, Tackes J, Muheisen S, Wang X. Immobilized probe and glass surface chemistry as variables in microarray fabrication. BMC Genomics5, 53 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dufva M. Fabrication of high quality microarrays. Biomol. Eng.22(5–6), 173–184 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfaller MA. Molecular approaches to diagnosing and managing infectious diseases: practicality and costs. Emerg. Infect. Dis7(2), 312–318 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggertson L. Vioxx award good news for Canadian lawsuits. CMAJ173(7), 744 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frantz S. How to avoid another ‘Vioxx’. Nature Rev. Drug Discov.4(1), 5–7 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurwitz D, Weizman A, Rehavi M. Education: teaching pharmacogenomics to prepare future physicians and researchers for personalized medicine. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.24(3), 122–125 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar