12
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies to prevent trachomatous blindness

&
Pages 219-228 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Tabbara KR Trachoma: a review. j Chemother 13\(Suppl. 1), 18–22 (2001).
  • Thylefors B, Dawson CR, Jones BR, West SK, Taylor HR. A simplified system for assessment of trachoma and its complications. Bull. World Health Organ. 65,477–483 (1987).
  • ••Presents a clear description of the differentstates associated with trachoma and its complications.
  • Emerson PM, Bailey RL, Walraven GE, Lindsay SW Human and other faeces as breeding media of the trachoma vector Musca sorbens. Med. Vet. Entomol 15(3), 314–320 (2001).
  • Guraksin A, Gullulu G. Prevalence of trachoma in eastern Turkey. Int. J. Epidemiol 26(2), 436–442 (1997).
  • West SK. Facial cleanliness and risk of trachoma in families. Arch. Ophthalmol 109,855–857 (1991).
  • West S, Munoz B, Lynch M, Kayongoya A, Chilangwa Z, Mmbaga BB, Taylor HR. Impact of face-washing on trachoma in Kongwa, Tanzania. Lancet 21,345(8943), 155–158 (1995).
  • ••Reports on the effects of a community-based randomized trial of a face-washing intervention after a mass treatment campaign with topical antibiotic.
  • Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N. Trachoma. BE Med 323(7306), 218–221 (2001).
  • Frick KD, Melia BM, Buhrmann RR,West SK. Trichiasis and disability in a trachoma-endemic area of Tanzania. Arch. Ophthalmol 119(12), 1839–1844 (2001).
  • ••Documents a statistically significantimpact of trichiasis on functional status, even prior to having visual impairment.
  • Yeung YM, Hon CY, Ho CK. A simple surgical treatment for upper lid trichiasis. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers 28(1), 74–76 (1997).
  • Baveja UK, Hiranandani MK, Talwar P, Sen DK. Laboratory techniques for diagnosis of chlamydial infections of the eye.j Commun. Dis. 29(3), 247–253 (1997).
  • •Demonstrates the important differences between clinical manifestations of the disease and laboratory tests for chlarnydial infection.
  • The Trachoma Study Group. Current trends in trachoma in a previously hyperendemic area. Indianj Ophthalmol 46(4), 217–220 (1998).
  • Zerihun N. Trachoma in Jimma zone, south western Ethiopia. Pop. Med. Int. Health 2(12), 1115–1121 (1997).
  • Congdon N, West S, Vitale S, Katala S, Mmbaga BB. Exposure to children and risk of active trachoma in Tanzanian women. Am. Epidemiol 137(3), 366–372 (1993).
  • Katz J, West KP Jr, Khatry SK et al. Prevalence and risk factors for trachoma in Sarlahi district, Nepal. BE J. Ophthalmol 80(12), 1037–1041 (1996).
  • Hsieh YH, Bobo LD, Quinn TO, West SK. Risk factors for trachoma: 6-year follow-up of children aged 1 and 2 years. Am. J. Epidemiol 152(3), 204–211 (2000).
  • Emerson PM, Lindsay SW, Walraven GE, Dibba SM, Lowe KO, Bailey RL. The Flies and Eyes Project Design and methods of a cluster-randomised intervention study to confirm the importance of flies as trachoma vectors in The Gambia and to test a sustainable method of fly control using pit latrines. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 9(2), 105–117 (2002).
  • ••Describes a study to enhance knowledgeabout flies as a vector of trachoma transmission.
  • West SK, Munoz B, Lynch M, Kayongoya A, Mmbaga BB, Taylor HR. Risk factors for constant, severe trachoma among preschool children in Kongwa, Tanzania. Am. Epidemiol 143(1), 73–78 (1996).
  • •Key article because in the process of describing risk-factors for constant, severe active disease, the authors also describe the risk-factors for complications.
  • Taylor HR. Trachoma in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 175(7), 371–372 (2001).
  • http://www.who.intipbditrachomai ebres98-e.htm.
  • Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Global data on blindness. Bull. World Health Organ. 73(1),115–121 (1995).
  • •This is a reference for the prevalence rates of blindness generally — by region and by disease.
  • Ranson MK, Evans TG. The global burden of trachomatous visual impairment: I. Assessing prevalence. Int. Ophthalmol 19(5), 261–270 (1995–1996). First in a set of two papers that set the standard in terms of transparent methods of estimating the global burden of trachoma.
  • Evans T, Ranson MK. The global burden of trachomatous visual impairment: II. Assessing burden. Int. Ophthalmol 19(5), 271–280 (1995–1996).
  • •Second in a set of two papers that set the standard in terms of transparent methods of estimating the global burden of trachoma, except that the pharmacoeconomic outcome measure is not a standard measure.
  • Report of the First Meeting of the WHO Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization. (unpublished document WHO/PBUGET/97.1) (1997).
  • •Gives a flavor of the Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma meetings. Three reports are online at present.
  • Dawson CR, Schachter J, Sallam S, Sheta A, Rubinstein RA, Washton H. A comparison of oral azithromycin with topical oxytetracyclineipolymyxin for the treatment of trachoma in children. Gun. Infect. Dis. 24(3), 363–368 (1997).
  • Fraser-Hurt N, Bailey RL, Cousens S, Mabey D, Faal H, Mabey DC. Efficacy of oral azithromycin versustopical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma. Bull. World Health Organ. 79(7), 632–640 (2001).
  • •One of several recent studies on the efficacy or effectiveness of azithromycin that usefully supplement the limited cost-effectiveness studies.
  • Schachter J, West SK, Mabey D et al. Azithromycin in control of trachoma. Lancet 354(9179), 630–635 (1999).
  • ••Documents the similar efficacy ofazithromycin and tetracycline in multiple settings.
  • Tabbara KF, Abu El Asnar, Al Omar 0, Chloudhury AH, Al Faisal Z. Single dose azithromycin in the treatment of trachoma, a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmology 103,842–846 (1996).
  • Osaki Holm S et al. Comparison of two azithromycin distribution strategies for controlling trachoma in Nepal. Bull. World Health Organ. 79(3), 194–200 (2001).
  • Leach AJ, Shelby-James TM, Mayo M et al. A prospective study of the impact of community-based azithromycin treatment of trachoma on carriage and resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24(3), 356–362 (1997).
  • •This study, among all concerned with the use of azithromycin in mass treatment against trachoma, most strongly suggests a relationship to resistant strains of bacteria.
  • Treadway G. Azithromycin: a new 15- membered macrolide. Jpn I Antibiot 54(Suppl A), 70–76 (2001).
  • Duran JM, Amsden GW. Azithromycin: indications for the future? Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 1(3), 489–505 (2000).
  • Chem KC, Shrestha SK, Cevallos V et al Alterations in the conjunctival bacterial flora following a single dose of azithromycin in a trachoma endemic area. Br. Ophthalmol 83(12), 1332–1335 (1999).
  • •Concludes that the clinical relevance of the effects of mass treatment against trachoma on other bacterial flora has yet to be determined.
  • Peterson J, Treadway G. Impact of community-based azithromycin treatment of trachoma on carriage and resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26(1), 248–249 (1998).
  • •This letter should be read in combination with the Leach et al. [29].
  • Bowman RJ, Sillah A, Van Dehn C et al Operational comparison of single-dose azithromycin and topical tetracycline for trachoma. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sc]. 41(13), 4074–4079 (2000).
  • ••Compared azithromycin and tetracyclinein a less rigorously administered setting that attempted to measure effectiveness rather than efficacy Performed a simple cost-effectiveness comparison of using azithromycin generally with using it for only cases of infection with more severe clinical symptoms.
  • Unlu K, Aksunger A, Soker S, Karaca C, Bilek K. Prospective evaluation of the argon laser treatment of trachomatous trichiasis. Jpn I Ophthalmol. 44(6), 677–679 (2000).
  • Oguz H, Aras C, Ozdamar A. Thermoablation treatment for trichiasis in trachoma using the semiconductor diode pumped laser. Eur. j Ophthalmol 9(2), 85–88 (1999).
  • West S, Taylor HR. Bilamellar tarsal rotation is the preferred treatment for trachomatous trichiasis. Surv. Ophthalmol 43(5), 468 (1999).
  • Graz B, Xu JM, Yao ZS, Han SR, Kok A. Trachoma: can trichiasis be treated with a sticking-plaster? A randomized clinical trial in China. Tmp. Med. Int. Health 4(3), 222–228 (1999).
  • Khandekar R, Mohammed AJ, Courtright P. Recurrence of trichiasis: a long-term follow-up study in the Sultanate of Oman. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 8(2-3), 155–161 (2001).
  • •Documents the recurrence rate and severe recurrence rate of trichiasis after surgery over the longest time period to date.
  • Pruss A, Mariotti SR Preventing trachoma through environmental sanitation: a review of the evidence base. Bull. World Health Organ. 78(2), 258–266 (2000).
  • •Thoroughly reviews the environmental component of the SAFE strategy.
  • Bailey R, Lietman T The SAFE strategy for the elimination of trachoma by 2020: will it work? Bull. World Health Organ. 79(3), 233–236 (2001).
  • Evans TG, Ranson MK, Kyaw TA, Ko CK. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of preventing trachomatous visual impairment: lessons from 30 years of trachoma control in Burma. BE J. Ophthalmol 80(10), 880–889 (1996).
  • ••The only long-term cost-effectivenessstudy in this area.
  • Frick KD, Lietman TM, Holm SO, Jha HC, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC. Cost-effectiveness of trachoma control measures: comparing targeted household treatment and mass treatment of children. Bull. World Health Organ. 79(3), 201–207 (2001).
  • ••The only published cost-effectivenesscomparison of targeted and mass treatment of trachoma.
  • Bowman RJ, Soma OS, Alexander N et al. Should trichiasis surgery be offered in the village? A community randomised trial of village vs. health centre-based surgery. 7i-op. Med. Int. Health 5 (8), 528–533 (2000).
  • Frick KD, Keuffel EL, Bowman RJ. Epidemiological, demographic, and economic analyses: measurement of the value of trichiasis surgery in The Gambia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 8(2-3), 191–201 (2001).
  • ••The only study to date projecting theeconomic value of the productivity effect of using trichiasis surgery to avert blindness.
  • Burton MJ, Frick KD, Bailey RL, Bowman RJC. Azithromycin for the treatment and control of trachoma. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 3(2), 113–120 (2002).
  • •Contains one supplemental cost-effectiveness analysis to the earlier results presented by Bowman et al. [34] on the cost-effectiveness of giving azithromycin only to those with more severe active disease.
  • Schemann JP, Sacko D. [Strategies to control trachoma]. Sante 8(2), 150–156 (1998).
  • ••The only cost of trachomatous blindnessavoidance study from Mali.
  • Frick KD, West SK. The SAFE strategy for trachoma control: planning a cost-effectiveness analysis of the antibiotic component and beyond. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 8(4), 205–214 (2001).
  • •Lays out a framework for future cost-effectiveness work in this area.
  • Philipson T, Dow WH. Infectious disease transmission and infection-dependent matching. Math Biosci. 148 (2), 161–180 (1998).
  • Lietman T, Porco T, Dawson C, Blower S. Global elimination of trachoma: how frequently should we administer mass chemotherapy? Nat. Med. 5(5), 572–576 (1999).
  • •One of the more sophisticated mathematical models of trachoma reinfection to date and suggests the frequency of azithromycin mass treatment administration necessary to eliminate active disease.
  • Report of the Second Meeting of the WHO Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization. (unpublished document WHO/PBUGET/98.2) (1998).
  • Solomon AW, Akudibillah J, Abugri P et al Pilot study of the use of community volunteers to distribute azithromycin for trachoma control in Ghana. Bull. World Health Organ. 79(1), 8–14 (2001).
  • •One of several recent studies of ways to distribute azithromycin for trachoma control.
  • Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N. Antibiotics for trachoma (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev (1), CD001860 (2002).
  • Guzey M, Aslan G, Ozardali I, Basar E, Satici A, Karadede S. Three-day course of oral azithromycin vs topical oxytetracyclineipolymyxin in treatment of active endemic trachoma. Jpn I Ophthalmol 44(4), 387–391 (2000).
  • •One of several recent effectiveness studies that are useful as a supplement to the limited cost-effectiveness studies.
  • Laming AC, Currie BJ, DiFrancesco M, Taylor HR, Mathews JD. A targeted, single-dose azithromycin strategy for trachoma. Med. J. Aust. 172 (4), 163–166 (2000).
  • •One of several recent effectiveness studies that are useful as a supplement to the limited cost-effectiveness studies.
  • Whitty CJ, Glasgow KW, Sadiq ST, Mabey DC, Bailey R. Impact of community-based mass treatment for trachoma with oral azithromycin on general morbidity in Gambian children. Fenian: Infect. Dis. 18(11), 955–8 (1999).
  • •One of several recent effectiveness studies that are useful as a supplement to the limited cost-effectiveness studies.

Websites

  • Alliance for the Global Elimination of blinding Trachoma. Description of the disease, map, prevalence, results of specific interventions in some countries, objectives of the Global Alliance of Trachoma Control www.who.int/pbd/trachoma/ss/whoget/ sld001.htm
  • International Trachoma Initiative www.trachoma.org/
  • Alliance for the Global Elimination of blinding Trachoma reports, resolutions, simplified trachoma grading including images (Program of the Prevention of Blindness), countries www.who.intipbd/ trachoma/pressrel.htm

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.