Update on the use of osteoarthritis-specific outcome measures

References

• McAlindon TE, Cooper C, Kirwan JR, Dieppe PA. Knee pain and disability in the community. Br. Rheumatol 31,189–192 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long M. The family Encyclopaedia of Medicine and Health. Robinson, London, UK (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Pendleton A, Arden N, Dougados M et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann. Rheumatic Diseases 59(12), 936–944 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Rheumatological Subcommittee On Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Arthritis & Rheumatism 43(9), 1905–1915 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Altman RD. The syndrome of osteoarthritis. j Rheumatology24, 766–767 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• •Brief review of the etiology and epidemiology of OA.
   Google Scholar
• Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA. Osteoarthritis: New Insights: Part 1: The disease and its risk factors. Ann. Intern. Med. 133(8), 635–646 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira SA, Felson DT, Reed JI, Cirillo PA, Walker AM. Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organisation. Am. Coll Rheumatol 38(8), 1134–1141 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro JF, Walters SJ Snaith ML. Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology38, 870–877 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N. Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials. j Rheumatology 24 (Suppl. 43), 49–51 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks P, Boers M Tugwell P. Introduction: OMERACT 111-The "ACT" Revisited. Rheumatology24, 764–765 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M etal. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future Phase III clinical trials in knee, hip and hand osteoarthritis. consensus development at OMERACT 111.1 Rheumatology24,799–802 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• ••Key paper with recommendations of whatoutcome measures to use in OA studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N. Osteoarthritis clinical trials: candidate variables and clinimetric properties. Rheumatology24, 768–778 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• ••Excellent review of OA outcomemeasures.
   Google Scholar
• Ravaud P, Dougados M. Radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 24, 786–791 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Bergner M. Measurement of health status in the 1990s. Ann. Rev Public Health 11,165–183 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann. Intern. Med. 118(8), 622–629 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopaedic evaluation. Med. Care 28(7), 632–642 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med. Care 33(Suppl.), A5131-144 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan WW Goldsmith CH et al Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.j Rheumatology15,1833–1840 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Initial paper on WOMAC, one of the recommended outcome measures for OA studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmeier CJM, March LM, Cross MJ et al A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 9,137–146 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index questionnaires and global assessments in patients with Osteoarthritis. Rheumatology27(11), 2635–2641 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Development of a self-administered outcome measure. J. Orthopaedic Sports Physical Ther. 28(2), 88–96 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Englund M, Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. Patient-relevant outcomes fourteen years after meniscectomy: influence of type of meniscal tear and size of resection. Rheumatology 40(6), 631–639 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequesne MG, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: Validation — Value in comparison with other assessment tests. Land. j Rheumatol. (Suppl. 65), 85–89 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lequesne MG. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology24, 779–781 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Gentelle-Bonnassies S, Le-Claire P, Mezieres M, Ayral X, Dougados M. Comparison of the responsiveness of symptomatic outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 13 (5), 280–285 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Dreiser R-L, Maheu E, Guillou JB et al Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Rev Rhumatisme English ed 6\(Suppl. 1), 43S-53S (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Drieser RL, Maheu E, Guillou GB. Sensitivity to change of the functional index for hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 8(Suppl. A), S25—S28 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Maheu E, Drieser RL, Guillou GB, Dewailly J. Hand osteoarthritis patients characteristics according to the existence of a hormone replacement therapy. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 8(Suppl. A), S33—S37 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Dreiser RL, Gersberg M, Thomas F, Courcier S. Ibuprofen 800mg for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the interphalangeal joints of the hand or trapezo metacarpal joint. Rev Rhum. Engl Ed. 60(11), 719–724 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Graber-Duvernay B, Forestier R, Francon A. Efficacy of the Berthollet technique at Aix les Bains spa on functional impairment in hand osteoarthritis. A controlled therapeutic study. Rhumatologie 49(4), 151–156 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Cooley HM, Bellamy N. A cross- sectional study of the association between Heberden's nodes, radiographic osteoarthritis of the hands, grip strength, disability and pain. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 9(7), 606–611 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirandeau S, Chevalier X, Conrozier T etal. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 9 (6), 570–577 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fries JF, Spitz PW, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis & Rheum. 23,137–145 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths G, Bellamy N, Bailey WH et al A comparative study of the relative efficiency of the WOMAC, AIMS and HAQ instruments in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Inflammopharmacology3, 1–6 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis: The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum. 23,146–152 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ etal. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 35, 1–10 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Measuring Disease: A review of Disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK (1995).
   Google Scholar
• ••Comprehensive description and summaries of various outcome measures.
   Google Scholar
• Poiraudeau S, Dougados M, Ait-Hadad H etal. Evaluation of the French version of a quality of life scale (AIM52) in Rheumatology patients? Rev Rhum. Engl. Ed. 60(9), 466–472 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Listrat V, Ayral X, Patamello F, Bonvarlet JP, Simonnet J, Dougados M. Arthroscopic evaluation of potential structure modifying activity of hyaluronan in osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 5(3), 153–160 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Deniston OL. Inter-observer reliability of a functional status assessment instrument. J. Chronic Diseases 31,573–580 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jette AM, Davies AR, Cleary PD etal The Functional Status Questionnaire: Reliability and validity when used in primary care. .1. Gen Intern Med. 1,143-149 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Deniston OL, Jette AM. A functional status assessment instrument: validation in an elderly population. Health Services Res 15, 21–34 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Lo IKY, Griffin S, Kirldey A. The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 9(8), 771–778 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domsic RT, Saltzman CL. Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int. 19(7), 466–471 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Measuring Health: A review of quality of life measurement scales, 2nd edition. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK (1997).
   Google Scholar
• ••Book with comprehensive description andsummary of generic outcome measures.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, Boston MA, USA (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual Health Institute, Boston, USA (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kosinski M, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX, Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 Health Survey as a Generic Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials of Patients With Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions and Score Reliability. Med. Care 37(5 Suppl.), MS10—MS22 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kosinski M, Keller SD, Ware JE Jr, Hatoum HT, Kong SX. The SF-36 health survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of the scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity. Med Care 37(5 Suppl.), M523—M539 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi SK, Salmon JW, Zhao SZ, Lambert BL, Gore PR, Conrad K. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin. Therapeut. 23(7), 1080–1098 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX. The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): I Development and cross-validation of scoring algorithms. Med. Care 37(5 Suppl.), M540—M550 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Keller SD, Ware JE Jr., Hatoum HT, Kong SX. The SF-36 arthritis-specific health index (ASHI): II test of validity in four clinical trials. Med Care 37(5 Suppl.), M551—M560 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Fagnani F, Bouvenot G, Valat JP eta] Medico-economic analysis of diacerein with or without standard therapy in the treatment of osteoarthritis. PharmacoEconomics13(1 pt 2), 135–146 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. kkalth Polig,16,199–207 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. The Measurement and Valuation of Health: A Chronicle. Discussion Paper 136, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Torrance GW, Boyle MET, Horwood SR Applications of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Operat. Res. 30,1043–1069 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance GW, Furlong W Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions: Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics 7,503–520(1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics7, 490–502 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett KJ, Torrance GW, Moran LA, Smith F, Goldsmith CH. Health state utilities in knee replacement surgery: the development and evaluation of the McKnee. j Rheumatology 24 (9), 1796–1805 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a Preference-based Single Index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J. Clin. Epidemiol 51 (11), 1115–1128 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.J Health Econ. 21, 271–292 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• •Useful paper which shows how existing generic HRQOL instruments can be adapted to produce a preference-based measure.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, Harper R, Booth A. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 3(9), 1–164 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• •Review paper.
   Google Scholar
• Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bellamy N. Comparison of the responsiveness and the relative effect size of the WOMAC and the SF-36 in a randomised, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Cam Res. 12(3), 172–179 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, Moskowitz RW. Design and conduct of clinical trials in osteoarthritis: preliminary recommendations from a task force of the osteoarthritis research society. I Rheumatology 24,792–794 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• ••Useful paper on the design of clinical trialsin OA.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Campbell J, Stevens J, Pilch L, Stewart C, Mahmod Z. Validation study of a computerised version of the WOMAC. I Rheumatology 24(12), 2413–2415 (1997).
   Google Scholar