Treatment satisfaction as an outcome measure in cancer clinical treatment trials

References

• Castelin P, Kerr JR. Satisfaction and cardiac lifestyle. J. Adv NUTS. 21,498–505 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz JN, Phillips CB, Poss R et a/. The validity and reliability of a total hip arthroplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire. J. Bone Jt Surg. Ti, 1528–1534 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Luciani RJ, Osterhaus JT, Gutterman DL. Patient preferences for migraine therapy: Subcutaneous surnatriptan compared with other medications. J. Family Frac. 41,147-152 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar JM, Madden PM, Gleeson DT et al Premixed insulin preparations in pen syringes maintain glycemic control and are preferred by patients. Diabetes Care 17, 874–878 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boe J, Stikso G, Svensson K, Asbrink E. New method of evaluation patient preference for different inhalation delivery systems. Ann. Allergy68, 255–260 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bendtsen P, Bjurulf P Perceived needs and patient satisfaction in relation to care provided in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Qual. Assur Healthcare 5,243–253 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bullinger M etal. The EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire: Interim results of an international field study. In: Effect of Cancer On Quality of Life. Osoba D (Ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 185–203 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Weaver M, Patrick DL, Markson LE, Martin D, Frederic I, Berger M. Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. Am. J. Manag. Care 3,579-594 (1997). Good review of the methodological challenges in measuring treatment satisfaction.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg M, Oddone EZ, Henderson WG and the Veterans Affairs Co-operative Study Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmission. Does access to primary care reduce hospital admissions? N Engl Med 334,1441–1447 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Payne R, Mathias SD, Pasta DJ, Wanke LA, Williams R, Mahmoud R. Quality of life and cancer pain: Satisfaction and side effects with transdermal fentanyl versusoral morphimie.j Clin. Oncol 16,1588–1593 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomer M, Scheithauer W Twelves C, Maroun J, Wilke H. Answering patients' needs: oral alternatives to iv. therapy. Oncologist 6,12–16 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Shelley W Brundage M, Hayter C, Paszat L, Zhou S, Mackillop W A shorter fractionation schedule for postlumpectomy breast cancer patients. Int. J Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 47,1219-1228 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Ordway L, DiMatteo MR, Kravitz RL. Antecedents of adherence to medical recommendations: Results from the Medical Outcome Study. J. Behavioral Med. 15,447-468 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe GC. Patient satisfaction in primary healthcare: A literature review and analysis. Eva]. Frog. Plann. 6,185–210 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •Basic reading on patient satisfaction.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eva]. Frog. Plann. 6,247–263 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •Basic reading on patient satisfaction.
   Google Scholar
• Payne R, Coluzzi P, Hart L eta]. Long-term safety of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for breakthrough cancer pain. J Pain Sympt. Manag. 22(1), 575–583 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Brundage MD, Feldman-Stewart D, Cosby R et al. Phase I study of a decision aid for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Oncol. 19(5), 1326–1335 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Borras JM, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Navarro M et al. Compliance, satisfaction and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or out-patient treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Br. Med.1 322,826 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA. Determinants of patient satisfaction is postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconst. Surg. 106, 769–776 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry MG, Al-Mufti RAM, Jenkinson AD et al. An audit of outcome including patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction performed by breast surgeons. Ann. R. Coll Surg. Engl. 80,173–177 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blomqvist L, Malm M. Clinical experience with the lateral thoracodorsal flap in breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 43,7–13 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomised study, `SVEN, comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defmed problem areas of life and cosmetic result. Plast. Reconst. Surg. 105,66–74 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients' satisfaction and aesthetic outcome after pedicled free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast. Reconst. Surg. 107,1142–1155 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int. J Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 49,713–721 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick J. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast. Reconst. Surg. 108,361-369 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ringberg A, Tengrup I, Aspegren K, Palmer B. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Eur j Surg. 25,470–476 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Thijs-Boer FM, Thijs JT, van de Wiel HBM. Conventional or adhesive external breast prosthesis? A prospective study of the patients' preference after mastectomy. Cancer Nursing24, 227–230 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK et al. On behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG). Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801. Fnr.j Cancer34, 307–314 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Jahkola T Self-perceptions of women after early breast cancer surgery. Eur.j Surg. Oncol 24,9–14 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers SN, McNally D, Mahmoud M, Chan MFVVY, Humphris GM. Psychologic response of the edentulous patient after primary surgery for oral cancer: a cross-sectional study. J Prosthet. Dent. 82,317-321 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gotoh M, Mizutani K, Furukawa T, Kinukawa T, Ono Y, Ohshima S. Quality of micturition in male patients with orthotopic neobladder replacement. 146rld Urol. 18,411-416 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Yu CLM, Fielding R, Chan CLVV, Sham JST. Chinese nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy: association between satisfaction with information provided and quality of life. Cancer92, 2126–2135 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellm LA, Epstein JB, Rose-Ped AM, Fu R, Martin PJ, Fuchs HJ. Assessment of various topical oral formulations by bone marrow transplant recipients. Oral Oncology37, 42–49 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hartkamp A, van Boxtel AJH, Zonnenberg BA, Witteveen PO. Totally implantable venous access devices: evaluation of complications and a prospective comparative study of two different port systems. The Netherlanthj Med 57,215–223 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markt JC, Lemon JC. Extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center: A survey of patient attitudes and opinions. j Pmsthet. Dent. 85,608-613 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fowler JE, on behalf of the VIADUR study group. Patient-reported experience with the VIADUR 12-month leuprolide implant for prostate cancer. Urology 58,430–434 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Adshead J, Khoubhi B, Wood J, Rustin G. Testicular implants and patient satisfaction: a questionnaire-based study of men after orchidectomy for testicular cancer. BJU International88, 559–562 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallo M, Staskin DR. Patient satisfaction with a reusable undergarment for urinary incontinence. WOCN24, 226–236 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scientific Review Committee, Medical Outcomes Trust. Instrument review criteria. Med. Outcome Trust Bull. 3 (Suppl.), I—IV (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Sprangers M, Cull A, Groenvold M on behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Study Group. Guidelines for Developing questionnaire modules Module Development Committee. EORTC, Brussels, Belgium (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc. Sc]. Med. 47,1351-1359 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• •Conceptual issues in interpreting patient satisfaction.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers A, Karlsen S, Addington-Hall J. All the services were excellent. It is when the human element comes in that things go wrong': dissatisfaction with hospital care in the last year of life. J. Ady NUTS. 31,768-774 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins VA, Fallowfield LJ, Souhami A, Sawtell M. How do doctors explain randomised clinical trials to their patients? Eur I Cancer35(8), 1187–1193 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Agre P McKee K, Gargon N, Kurtz RC. Patient satisfaction with an informed consent process. Cancer Bart 5(3), 162–167 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Liang VV, Burnett CB, Rowland JH eta]. Communication between physicians and older women with localised breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. Clin. Oncol 20,1008–1016 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson JL, Marks G, Johnson CA eta]. Path model of multidimensional compliance with cancer therapy. Health PTchology 6 (3), 183–207 (1987) .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R. Survey of patient satisfaction: I Important general considerations. Br. Med. 302,887–889 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: A review of issues and concepts. Soc. Sri. Med. 45,1829–1843 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Basic reading on patient satisfaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks AAJ, Vrielink MR, Smets EMA, Van Es SQ, De Haes JCJM. Improving the assessment of (in)patients' satisfaction with hospital care. Med. Cam. 39,270–283 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• •Rigorous study of patient satisfaction item sales format.
   Google Scholar
• Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, Dither F, Scaffidi E, de Haes JCJM. A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: preliminary psychometric analysis in an oncology institute in Italy. Ann. aryl 10,839–846 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C eta]. A Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care : Preliminary psychometric analysis in French, Polish, Swedish and Italian oncology patients. Pat. Educ. Counse143, 243–252 (2001).
   Google Scholar