Update on effective interventions to increase tobacco cessation

References

• McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA4 270, 2207–2212 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• •Ranks the health impacts of various risk-factors and indicates that tobacco use is the leading killer of Americans.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Tobacco Or Health: A Globa19atus Report World HealthOrganization, Geneva, Switzerland (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost and economic costs —United States, 1995-1999. MIIIWR51,300–303 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ••Gives number of deaths attributable tosmoking in the USA and the economic costs associated with tobacco use morbidity and mortality.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott S, Godfrey C, Raw M, West R, McNeill A. Guidance for commissioners on the cost effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions. Tbarax53, S1—S38 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Fielding JE, Husten CG, Eriksen MR Tobacco: health effects and control. In: Public Health and Preventive Medicine. Wallace RB (Ed.), Appleton & Lange Inc., Stamford, CT, USA, 817–845 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• •Good summary of health effects of tobacco use and tobacco control interventions.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Pibmen And Smoking: A Report Of The Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MD, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• •Sentinel summary of the health effects of tobacco use among women and factors influencing tobacco use among women.
   Google Scholar
• Arday DR, Milton MH, Husten CG etal. Smoking and functional status among Medicare managed care enrollees. Am. J. Public Health (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nusselder WJ, Looman CWN, Marang- van de Mheen PJ, van de Mheen H, Mackenbach JP. Smoking and the compression of morbidity. j 43i. Comm. Health. 54,566-574 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Arday DR, Giovino GA, Schulman J etal. Cigarette smoking and self-reported health problems among US high school seniors, 1982–1989. Am. J. Health Promotion 10, 111–116 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Health Effects Of Exposure To Environmental Tobacco Smoke: The Report Of The California Environmental Protection Agency Smoking and tobacco control monograph 10. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Respiratory Health Effects Of Passive Smoking' Lung Cancer And Other Disorders: The Report Of The Lk Environmental Protection Agency Smoking and tobacco control monograph no. 4, NIH pub no 93–3605, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA (1993).
   Google Scholar
• •Describes health effects of secondhand smoke.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Benefits Of Smoking Cessation: A Report Of The Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health. Atlanta, GA, USA (1990). DHHS pub no. (cDq90–8416.
   Google Scholar
• ••Sentinel review of the benefits of smokingcessation.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ etal. Treating Tobacco Ike And Dependence: Clinical Practice Guideline. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Rockville, MD, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• ••Premier US guideline on the clinicaltreatment of tobacco use.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins DP, Husten CG, Fielding JE etal. Evidence reviews and recommendations on interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: a summary of selected guidelines. Am J Prey Med 20(2S), 67–87 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• ••Summarizes findings from several tobaccoguidelines, demonstrating consistent conclusions using a variety of methodologies.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins DP, Briss PA, Ricard CJ etal. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am. J. Prey Med 20(2S), 16–66 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• •Premier US guideline on community interventions that increase cessation (and interventions that prevent tobacco use and exposure to secondhand smoke).
   Google Scholar
• US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide To Clinical Preventive Services, 3nd Edition, 2000–2002. US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA (2002). Available at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/cps3dix.htm Accessed May 7, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Ike: A Report Of The Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. Atlanta, GA, USA (2000). Available at: www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ sgr tobacco_use.htm Accessed May 3, 2002. First Surgeon General's report to report on effective interventions to decrease tobacco use.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster T, Stead L, Sowden A, West R. Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. (2002). Available at: www.dphpc.ox.ac.uld cochrane tobacco/ Accessed May 20, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Raw M, McNeill A, West R Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: a guide to effective smoking cessation interventions for the healthcare system. Thorax 53 (Suppl. 5), S1—S38 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices For Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs — August 1999. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. Atlanta, GA, USA (1999). Available at: www.cdc.gov/tobacco/bestprac.htm Accessed May 20, 2002
   Google Scholar
• ••Guideline for state funding of comprehensive tobacco control programs.
   Google Scholar
• Miller M, Wood L. Smoking Cessation Interventions: Review Of Evidence And Implications For Best Practice hl Healthcare Settings. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia (2002).
   Google Scholar
• European partnership to reduce tobacco dependence. WHO evidence based recommendations on the treatment of tobacco dependence. (2001).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. How To Help Your Patients Stop Smoking. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Jorenby DE, Leischow SJ, Nides MA etal. A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl. J Med 340, 685–691 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Zhu SH, Melcer T, Jichao S et al. Smoking cessation with and without assistance. Am. Prey Med. 18, 305–311 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yankelovich Partners Inc. Smoking Cessation Stuoy. American Lung Association, NY, USA (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike AN, Rigotti NA, Stafford RS, Singer DE. National patterns in the treatment of smokers by physicians. JAMA 279, 604–608 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Oster G. The cost-effectiveness of counseling smokers to quit. JAN/4 261, 75–79 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Cromwell J, Bartosch WJ, Fiore MC etal. Cost-effectiveness of the clinical practice recommendations in the AHCPR guideline for smoking cessation. JAN/A 278, 1759–1766 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• •Describes the cost-effectiveness of state-of-the-art tobacco use treatments.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield AB, Maciosek MV, McGinnis JM et al. Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. Am. J Prey Med. 21, 1–9 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Ranks effective clinical preventive servicesbased on disease impact and the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Demonstrates that treatment of tobacco use is the top clinical preventive service for adults. It is also currently provided to less than half of smokers.
   Google Scholar
• Sofian NB, McAfee T, Wilson J, Levan S. Telephone smoking cessation intervention: the Free and Clear Program. HIVIO Practice 9, 144–146 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• McAfee T, Wilson J, Dacey S etal. Awakening the sleeping giant: mainstreaming efforts to decrease tobacco use in an HMO. HIVIO Practice9, 138–143 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner EH, Curry SJ, Grothaus L etal. The impact of smoking and quitting on healthcare use. Arch. Intern. Med. 155, 1789–1795 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Partnership for Prevention. Whylnvestln Disease Prevention?Results From The Partnership For Prevention/william M Mercer Survey Of Employer-sponsorrd Health Plans. Partnership for Prevention, Washington, DC, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State medicaid coverage for tobacco dependence treatments — United States, 1998 and 2000. MV/WR50, 979–982 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomar SL, Husten CG, Manley MW Do dentists and physicians advise tobacco users to quit? j ATIZ Dent. Assn 127, 259–265 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Campaign for tobacco free kids. Available at: www.tobaccofreekids.org\research\factsheet s\pdf\0097.pdf Accessed October 30, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Johnson CE etal. A centralized telephone service for tobacco cessation: the California experience. Tobacco Control 9(Suppl. II), 1148–55 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Fan-ay MC, Pechacek TF, Chaloupka FJ. The Impact Of Tobacco Control Program Expenditurrs On Aggregate Cigarette Sales: 1981–1998. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (8691), December 2001. Available at www.nber.org/papers/w8691 Accessed May 15, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• •Demonstrates the effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco prevention and control program over and above any price increases that funded or accompanied the programs.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco Control State Hghlights 2002' Impact And Opportunity US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA, USA (2002). Available at: www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ statehi/statehi_2002.htm Accessed May 31, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• ••Describes state-specific data on smokingprevalence, the impact of tobacco use and funding for comprehensive tobacco prevention and control programs.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco use among adults — Arizona 1996 and 1999. M44WR50, 402–406 (2001). Available at www.cdc.gov/ mmwr/PDF/wk/mm5020.pdf Accessed May 31, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Abt Associates Inc. Independent Evaluation Of The Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program. Fourth annual report. Abt Associates Inc., MA, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Abt Associates, Inc. Independent Evaluation Of The Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program. Seventh annual report. Abt Associates Inc., MA, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Declines in lung cancer rates —California, 1988–1997.11/144R49, 1066–1069(2000). Available at www.odc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/ mm4947.pdf Accessed May 31, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• •Demonstrates health benefits that can accrue after implementing comprehensive tobacco prevention and control programs.
   Google Scholar
• Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. The association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease. N Engl. j Med 343, 1772–1777 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightwood JM, Glantz SA. Short-term economic and health benefits of smoking cessation: myocardial infarction and stroke. Circulation 96, 1089–1096 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cessation consortium. A National Blueprint For Dissemination And Implementing Evidence-based Clinical And Community .2rategies To Promote Tobacco (Ice Cessation. US Department of Health and Human Services (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• ••Blueprint developed by a consortium offederal and nongovernmental national organizations to stimulate a collaborative and strategic approach to increase cessation in the USA.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2nd Ed. With Understanding And Improving Health And Objectives For Improving Health. 2 vols. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA (November 2000).
   Google Scholar
• •Outlines the health objectives for the US.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Cleaning The Smoke: Assessing The Science Base For Tobacco Harm Reduction. Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, Bondurant S (Eds). National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• •Through analysis of the implications of potential reduced exposure compounds.
   Google Scholar