Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Volume 15, 2015 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
456
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

Discrete-choice experiments versus rating scale exercises to evaluate the importance of attributes

Ben FM WijnenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Inge M van der PuttenCAPHRI, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
Siebren GroothuisCAPHRI, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
Reina JA de Kinderen
,
Cindy YG NobenCAPHRI, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
Aggie TG PaulusCAPHRI, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
Bram LT RamaekersDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
Gaston CWM VogelCAPHRI, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
&
Mickael HiligsmannCAPHRI, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
 show all
Pages 721-728 | Published online: 03 Apr 2015

References

  • Bridges J. Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003;2(4):213-24
  • Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health – a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health 2011;14(4):403-13
  • Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess 2001;5(5):1-186
  • Shackley P, Ryan M. Involving consumers in health care decision making. Health Care Anal 1995;3(3):196-204
  • Louviere JJ, Flynn TN, Carson RT. Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling 2010;3(3):57-72
  • Phillips KA, Johnson FR, Maddala T. Measuring what people value: a comparison of ‘attitude’ and ‘preference’ surveys. Health Serv Res 2002;37(6):1659-79
  • Srinivasan V, Netzer O. Adaptive self-explication of multi-attribute preferences. Research Papers 1979; Stanford University, Graduate School of Business; 2007
  • Clark M, Determann D, Petrou S, et al. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: a Review of the Literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2014;32(9):883-902
  • Bridges JF, Lataille AT, Buttorff C, et al. Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods. Trends Amplif 2012;16(1):40-8
  • Johnson FR, Hauber AB, Osoba D, et al. Are chemotherapy patients’ HRQoL importance weights consistent with linear scoring rules? A stated-choice approach. Qual Life Res 2006;15(2):285-98
  • Pignone MP, Brenner AT, Hawley S, et al. Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(1):45-50
  • Moust J, Bouhuijs P, Schmidt H. Introduction to problem-based learning. In: Collaborative learning in the tutorial group. Taylor & Francis, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2007
  • Schmidt HG. Foundations of problem-based learning: some explanatory notes. Med Educ 1993;27(5):422-32
  • Choice Metrics. Available from: www.choice-metrics.com/
  • Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press; 2005
  • Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2011;20(3):273-86
  • Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003;2(1):55-64
  • Marshall D, Bridges JP, Hauber B, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health – how are studies being designed and reported? Patient-Patient-Centered-Outcome-Res 2010;3(4):249-56
  • de Bekker-Grob EW, Hol L, Donkers B, et al. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening. Value Health 2010;13(2):315-23
  • Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, et al. Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R36
  • Malhotra N, Birks D. Marketing Research: an applied approach. 3rd European Edition. In: Multidimensional scaling and conjoint analysis. Pearson Education, Edinburgh, England; 2007
  • Koedoot CG, de Haan RJ, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care? A prospective study explaining patients’ treatment preference and choice. Br J Cancer 2003;89(12):2219-26
  • Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. Best–worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ 2007;26(1):171-89

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.