Patient-centric HTA: different strokes for different folks

References

• Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making–the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012;366(9):780-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Audet AM. A 2020 vision of patient centered primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20(10):953-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, et al. An integrative model of patient-centeredness - a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One 2014;9(9):e107828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century, Edition. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. National Academies Press, Washington; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Dolan JG. Multi-criteria clinical decision support: a primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient 2010;3(4):229-48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser CS, et al. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Affairs 2010;29(8):1489-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient centred care. BMJ 2001;322(7284):444-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher AC, Juhnke C. Patient-centeredness in integrated healthcare delivery systems: Needs, expectations and priorities for organized healthcare systems. Int J Integr Care 2013;13(5):e051
   Google Scholar
• Banta HD. Resources for health. Technology assessment for policy making. Praeger; New York: 1982. p. 235
   Google Scholar
• Cohen AB, Hanft RS. Technology in American health care. Policy directions for effective evaluation and management. University of Michigan Press; Ann Arbor: 2004. p. 460
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen PB. Health technology assessment and diffusion of health technology. University Press; Odense: 1999. p. 285
   Google Scholar
• Rettig RA. Health care in transition. Technology assessment in the private sector. MR; 754: DHHS - ASPE - AHCPR. RAND; Santa Monica, California: 1997. 140
   Google Scholar
• Szczepura A, Kankaanpää J. Case studies, key concepts and strategic issues. In: Szczepura A, Kankaanpää J, editors. An introduction to health technology assessment, in assessment of health care technologies. Wiley; Chichester, England: 1996 . p. 247
   Google Scholar
• US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, Development of Medical Technology: Opportunities for Assessment. 1976
   Google Scholar
• Battista RN, Hodge MJ. The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium. CMAJ 1999;160(10):1464
   Google Scholar
• Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, et al. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998;2(16):iii-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jennett B. Health technology assessment. BMJ 1992;305(6845):67
   Google Scholar
• Moreira T. Understanding the role of patient organizations in health technology assessment. Health Expect 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Goodman C. Case studies, key concepts and strategic issues. In: Szczepura A, Kankaanpää J, editors. A basic methodology toolkit, in assessment of health care technologies. Wiley; Chichester [U.A.]: 1996. p. 247
   Google Scholar
• Sandman L, Heintz E. Assessment vs. appraisal of ethical aspects of health technology assessment: can the distinction be upheld? GMS Health Technol Assess 2014;10:Doc05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins DA, Curro FA, Fox CH. Defining patient-centricity opportunities, challenges, and implications for clinical care and research. Ther Inn Regul Sci 2013;47(3):349-55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher AC, Juhnke C. Patient preferences versus physicians’ judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2013;11(3):163-80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kääriäinen M, Kyngäs H. The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel. Scand J Caring Sci 2010;24(3):548-56
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum SH, Zinati SM, MacDonald A, et al. Organizational transformation to a patient centric culture: a case study. Leadersh Health Serv 2010;23(1):8-32
   Google Scholar
• Marsh K, Lanitis T, Neasham D, et al. Assessing the value of healthcare interventions using multi-criteria decision analysis: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2014;32(4):345-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciani OT. Rod, Briefing paper for the update to the Methods Guide. NICE, London; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006;4(1):14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adulin GD, Montero A, Xiao A. Multi-criteria decision analysis in oncology: an overview. Value Health 2014;17(3):A184
   Google Scholar
• Baltussen R, Youngkong S, Paolucci F, et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize health interventions: Capitalizing on first experiences. Health Policy 2010;96(3):262-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thokala PM, Devlin K, Van Til N, et al. Multi criteria decision analysis methods in health care: current status, good practice and future recommendations. Value Health 2014;17(3):A34
   Google Scholar
• Ramaekers BL, Joore MA, Grutters JP. How should we deal with patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation: a systematic review of national pharmacoeconomic guidelines. Value Health 2013;16(5):855-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green SB. Patient heterogeneity and the need for randomized clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1982;3(3):189-98
   Google Scholar
• Koerkamp BG, Weinstein MC, Stijnen T, et al. Uncertainty and patient heterogeneity in medical decision models. Med Decis Making 2010;30(2):195-205
   Google Scholar
• Vemer P, Goossens LM, Rutten-van Molken MP. Not simply more of the same: distinguishing between patient heterogeneity and parameter uncertainty. Med Decis Making 2014;34(8):1048-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerkamp BG, Stijnen T, Weinstein MC, et al. The combined analysis of uncertainty and patient heterogeneity in medical decision models. Med Decis Making 2011;31(4):650-61
   Google Scholar
• Grutters JP, Sculpher M, Briggs AH, et al. Acknowledging patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation : a systematic literature review. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;31(2):111-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges JF, Jones C. Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007;23(1):30-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MP, Gonzalez JM, Lerner HP, et al. Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making. Surg Endosc 2015; Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Perfetto EM, Burke L, Oehrlein EM, et al. Patient-focused drug development: a new direction for collaboration. Med Care 2015;53(1):9-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher A, Juhnke C. Patient, insuree, and public participation in health technology assessment: an international comparison. Under Rev 2015
   Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher A, Bethge S. Reduce mortality risk above all else: a discrete-choice experiment in acute coronary syndrome patients. Pharmacoeconomics 2015;33(1):71-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher AC, Bethge S. Patients’ preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Health Econ 2014; Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RF, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health 2013;16(1):3-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health 2011;14(4):403-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tony M, Wagner M, Khoury H, et al. Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11(1):329
   Google Scholar
• Williams JE, Flora JA. Health behavior segmentation and campaign planning to reduce cardiovascular disease risk among Hispanics. Health Educ Q 1995;22(1):36-48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boslaugh SE, Kreuter MW, Nicholson RA, et al. Comparing demographic, health status and psychosocial strategies of audience segmentation to promote physical activity. Health Educ Res 2005;20(4):430-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Brown J, Mkandawire G, et al. Audience segmentation as a social-marketing tool in health promotion: use of the risk perception attitude framework in HIV prevention in Malawi. Am J Public Health 2009;99(12):2224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater MD, Flora JA. Health lifestyles: audience segmentation analysis for public health interventions. Health Educ Q 1991;18(2):221-33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tollen LA, Ross MN, Poor S. Risk Segmentation related to the offering of a consumer directed health plan: a case study of humana Inc. Health Serv Res 2004;39(4p2):1167-88
   Google Scholar
• Lynn J, Straube BM, Bell KM, et al. Using population segmentation to provide better health care for all: the “Bridges to Health” model. Milbank Q 2007;85(2):185-208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 1966;74:132-57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. 1973
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge/London; 1985. p.; 9
   Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher A, Bethge S, Tockhorn A. Präferenzmessung im gesundheitswesen: grundlagen von discrete-choice-experimenten [measuring preferences in healthcare: introduction to discrete-choice experiments]. Gesundh ökon Qual manag 2013;18(4):159-72
   Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Johnson FR. Why not ask? Patient 2008;1(4):245-8
   Google Scholar
• Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics 2008;26(8):661-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 1994;24(6):19-43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, et al. QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Econ 2005;14(2):197-208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent DM, Rothwell PM, Ioannidis JP, et al. Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal. Trials 2010;11(1):85
   Google Scholar
• Hibbard JH. Moving toward a more patient-centered health care delivery system. Health Aff 2004;23:133-5
   Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher A, Johnson FR, Yang JC, et al. Do you want to hear the bad news? The value of diagnostic tests for Alzheimer’s disease. In: Health expectations an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. Value in Health in review. 2015
   Google Scholar