Economic evaluation alongside factorial trials: a systematic review of empirical studies

References

• Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1-158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis and reporting. BMJ 2011;342:d1548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston K, Buxton MJ, Jones DR, Fitzpatrick R. Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1999;3:1-73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couper DJ, Hosking JD, Cisler RA, et al. Factorial Designs in Clinical Trials: Options for Combination Treatment Studies. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2005;15:24-32
   Google Scholar
• Morris S, Morris TP, McGregor AH, et al. Function After Spinal Treatment, Exercise, and Rehabilitation. Spine 2011;36:1807-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang AH, Santher HN, Azen SP. Power Considerations for Testing an Interaction in a 2 × K Factorial Design with a failure Time outcome. Control Clin Trials 1994;15:489-502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green S, liu P, O’Sullivan J. Factorial Design Considerations. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3424-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain E, Wittes J. Factorial designs in clinical trials: the effect of non-compliance and subadditivity. Stat Med 1989;8:161-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakin H, Gray A, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Rationing of total knee replacement: a cost-effectiveness analysis on a large trial data set. BMJ Open 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Dakin H, Gray A. Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: why the method of analysis matters. Health Economist Study Group 2010. Available from: http://hesg.org.uk/papers [Last accessed 14/8/2013]
   Google Scholar
• Oppong R, Jowett S, Nicholls E, et al. Joint protection and hand exercises for hand osteoarthritis: an economic evaluation comparing methods for the analysis of factorial trials. Rheumatology 2014;113:1-8
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2009. Available from: www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dangour AD, Albala C, Allen E, et al. Effect of a nutrition supplement and Physical Activity Program on Pneumonia and Walking Capacity in Chilean Older People: A Factorial cluster randomised trial. PLoS Med 2011;8:1-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The UK BEAM Trial team. United Kingdom exercise and manipulation randomised trial: Cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 2004;329:1381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton GR, Sach TH, Jenkinson C, et al. Lifestyle interventions for knee pain in overweight and obese adults aged ≥ 45: economic evaluation of randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;339:b2273
   Google Scholar
• NICE, Guide to the methods of technology appraisal [ONLINE]. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf 2008. [Last accessed 17/9/2013]
   Google Scholar
• Thomas KS, Miller P, Doherty M, et al. Cost Effectiveness of a Two-Year Home Exercise Program for the Treatment of Knee Pain. Arthrit Care Res 2005;53:388-94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollinghurst S, Sharp D, Ballard K, et al. Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain: economic evaluation. BMJ 2008;337:a2656
   Google Scholar
• Boyle J, McCartney E, Forbes J, et al. A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of direct versus indirect and individual versus group modes of speech and language therapy for children with primary language impairment. Health Technol Assess 2007;25:1-139
   Google Scholar
• McBeth J, Prescott G, Scotland G, et al. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Exercise, or Both for Treating Chronic Widespread Pain. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:48-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhouse JC, Walters SJ, Oluboyede Y, et al. A randomised 2 × 2 trial of community versus hospital pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease followed by telephone or conventional follow-up. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:1-164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto D, Robertson MC, Abbott JH, et al. Manual therapy, exercise therapy, or both, in addition to usual care, for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. 2: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2013;21:1504-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, La Grow SJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of prevention of falls in people aged ≥ 75 with severe visual impairment: the VIP trial. BMJ 2005;331:817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafar TH, Islam M, Bux R, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Community Based Strategies for Blood Pressure Control in a Low income Developing Country: Findings from A Cluster Randomized Factorial Controlled Trial. Circulation 2011;124:1615-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren P, Buxton M, Kahan T, et al. The Lifetime Cost Effectiveness of Amlodipine-Based Therapy Plus Atorvastatin Compared with Atenolol Plus Atorvastatin, Amlodipine-Based Therapy Alone and Atenolol-Based Therapy Alone. Pharmacoeconomics 2009;27:221-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effing T, Kerstjens H, Van der Valk P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of self-treatment of exacerbations on the severity of exacerbations in patients with COPD: the COPE II study. Thorax 2009;64:956-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewycka S, Mwansambo C, Rosato M, et al. Effect of women’s groups and volunteer peer counselling on rates of mortality, morbidity, and health behaviours in mothers and children in rural Malawi (MaiMwana): a factorial, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013;381:1721-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakai A, Stone GW, Grines CL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting and abciximab for patient with acute myocardial infarction: results from the (CADILAC TRIAL). Circulation 2003;108:2857-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlister FA, Straus SE, Sackett DL, et al. Analysis and Reporting of Factorial Trials: A Systematic Review. JAMA 2003;289:2545-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery AA, Peters TJ, Little P. Design, analysis and presentation of factorial randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Method 2003;3:26-30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briggs A. Economic evaluation and clinical trials: size matters. BMJ 2000;321:1362-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon J, Arundell L, Hume C, et al. A cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce sedentary behaviour and promote physical activity and health of 8-9 year olds: The Transform-Us! Study. BMC Public Health 2011;11:759-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuffield Trust: Economic Evaluation and Health Care [ONLINE]. Available from: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/Economic-Evaluation-and-Health-Care.pdf. 1998. [Last accessed 18/9/2013]
   Google Scholar
• NICE. Methodology Checklist: economic evaluations [ONLINE]. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/media/633/71/The_guidelines_manual_2009_-_Appendix_H_Methodology_checklist_-_economic_evaluations.pdf 2009. [Last accessed 17/9/2013]
   Google Scholar
• Evers S, Goossens M, de Vet H, et al. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:240-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien B, Sculpher M. ‘Extended dominance in cost-effectiveness decision rules: Fine in principle but’. Med Decis Making 1998;18:488-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISPOR, Guidelines on Health Economic Evaluation: Consensus paper. [ONLINE]. Available from: www.ispor.org/peguidelines/source/Guidelines_Austria.pdf2006 [Last accessed 18/9/2013]
   Google Scholar