20,270
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Advantages and disadvantages of discrete-event simulation for health economic analyses

&
Pages 327-329 | Received 02 Feb 2016, Accepted 10 Mar 2016, Published online: 25 Mar 2016

References

  • Caro JJ. Disease-simulation models and health care decisions. Can Med Assoc J. 2000;162:1001–1002.
  • Caro JJ, Briggs AH, Siebert U, et al. Modeling good research practices—overview a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force–1. Med Decis Making. 2012;32:667–677.
  • Caro JJ, Möller J, Karnon J, et al. Discrete event simulation for health technology assessment. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. 354 p.
  • Caro JJ. Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:323–332.
  • Karnon J, Stahl J, Brennan A, et al. Modeling using discrete event simulation a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force–4. Med Decis Making. 2012;32:701–711.
  • Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Migliaccio-Walle K. Estimating survival for cost‐effectiveness analyses: a case study in atherothrombosis. Value Health. 2004;7:627–635.
  • Xenakis JG, Kinter ET, Ishak KJ, et al. A discrete-event simulation of smoking-cessation strategies based on varenicline pivotal trial data. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29:497–510.
  • Simpson KN, Pei PP, Möller J, et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for HIV infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis for the United States. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31:427–444.
  • Siebert U, Alagoz O, Bayoumi AM, et al., ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force-3. Value Health. 2012;15:812–820.
  • Caro JJ, Möller J. Decision-analytic models: current methodological challenges. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:943–950.
  • Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, et al., UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47:1747–1759.
  • Roberts M, Russell LB, Paltiel AD, et al. Conceptualizing a model a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force–2. Med Decis Making. 2012;32:678–689.
  • Caro JJ, Ishak KJ. No head-to-head trial? Simulate the missing arms. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:957–967.
  • Jacobson SH, Hall SN, Swisher JR. Discrete-event simulation of health care systems. In: Hall RW, editor. Patient flow: reducing delay in healthcare delivery. Los Angeles (CA): Springer; 2006. p. 211–252.
  • Pei P, Kongnakorn T, Hernández L, et al. PCV93 discrete event simulation of cardiac hospitals performing percutaneous coronary interventions. Value Health. 2010;13:A167.
  • Eddy DM, Hollingworth W, Caro JJ, et al. Model transparency and validation a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force–7. Med Decis Making. 2012;32:733–743.
  • Knottnerus JA. Research data as a global public good. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:270–271.
  • Caro JJ. Psst, have I got a model for you… Med Decis Making. 2015;35:139–141.
  • Caro JJ, Getsios D, Möller J. Regarding probabilistic analysis and computationally expensive models: necessary and required? Value Health. 2007;10:317–318.
  • Caro JJ, Möller J, Getsios D, et al. Invasive meningococcal disease epidemiology and control measures: a framework for evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:1.
  • Deniz B, Morgan G, Schey S, et al. Economic evaluation of lenalidomide combined with dexamethasone for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the UK. Blood. 2008;112:836–837.
  • Caro JJ. Discretely-integrated condition event (DICE) simulation for pharmacoeconomics. Pharmacoeconomics. Forthcoming 2016. doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0394-z.
  • Caro JJ, Möller J, Getsios D. Discrete event simulation: the preferred technique for health economic evaluations? Value Health. 2010;13:1056–1060.
  • Caro JJ, Eddy DM, Kan H, et al. Questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility of modeling studies for informing health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health. 2014;17:174–182.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.