Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills in the public sector in the USA

References

• Glasier A. Emergency postcoital contraception. N Engl. I Merl 337, 1058–1064 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •An excellent, comprehensive review of emergency contraception.
   Google Scholar
• Webb A. How safe is the Yuzpe method of emergency contraception? Fert. Control. Rev 4, 16–18 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Webb A, Taberner D. Clotting factors after emergency contraception. Adv. Contracept. 9, 75–82 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Task Force on postovulatory methods of fertility regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 352, 428–343 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Demonstrates that the levonorgestrel-only emergency contraceptive pills regimen is more effective and has fewer side effects than the ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel regimen.
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Ellertson C, Stewart E The effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Fain. Plana Pempect. 28, 58-64, 87 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Raymond EG, Creinin MD, Barnhart KT, Lovvom AE, Rountree W Trussell J. Meclizine for prevention of nausea associated with emergency contraceptive pills: a randomized trial. Obstet. Cynecol 95, 271–277 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Rodriguez G, Ellertson C. New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception 57, 363–369 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Rodriguez G, Ellertson C. Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception 59,147–51 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaggio G, von Hertzen H, Grimes DA, Van Look PFA. Timing of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen. Lancet 353, 721 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellertson C, Evans M, Ferden S eta]. Extending the time limit for starting the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception to 120 hours. Obstet. Cynecol 101, 1168–1171 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues I, Grou F, Joly J. Effectiveness of emergency contraception pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse. Am. j Obstet. Cynecol 184, 531–537 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Ding J et al Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 360, 1803–1810 (2002). Demonstrates that both doses of the levonorgestrel-only emergency contraceptive pill regimen may be taken at once and that the regimen can be extended to 120 hours after unprotected intercourse.
   Google Scholar
• Arowojolu AO, Okewole IA, Adekunle AO. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception in Nigerians. Contraception 66,269–273 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Stewart F, Guest F, Hatcher RA. Emergency contraceptive pills: a simple proposal to reduce unintended pregnancies. Fam. Bann. Perspect.24, 269–273 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trussell J, Koenig J, Ellertson C, Stewart E Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception. Am. j Public Health87,932–937 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1999 (11th edition). Government Printing Office. Washington DC (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam. Bann. Perspect. 30, 24–29 & 46 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• •Documents the extent of unintended pregnancy in the USA.
   Google Scholar
• Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS, Piccinino U. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 23(19), Table 14, 25 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Guillebaud J. When do you need to give emergency contraception for missed pills? Fertil Control. Rev. 4, 18–20 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Contraceptive Technology' 17th Revised Edition. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, Cates W Stewart GK, Kowal D, Guest F (Eds). Ardent Media, NY, USA (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Glasier A, Baird D. The effects of self- administering emergency contraception. N Engl. J Med. 339, 1–4 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Demonstrates that easier access to emergency contraceptive pills does not promote risk-taking.
   Google Scholar
• Kosunen E, Sihvo S, Hemminki E. Knowledge and use of hormonal emergency contraception in Finland. Contraception 55, 153–157 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine T, Harper C, Leon K, Darney Emergency contraception: advance provision in a young, high-risk clinic population. Obstet. Cynecol. 96, 1–7 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• •Demonstrates that easier access to emergency contraceptive pills does not promote risk-taking among teens.
   Google Scholar
• Graham A, Moore L, Sharp D, Diamond I. Improving teenagers knowledge of emergency contraception: cluster randomized controlled trial of a teacher led intervention. BE Med. 234(7347), 1179–1184 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Brown SS, Eisenberg L (Eds). The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families. National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Ellertson C, Trussell J, Stewart F, Winikoff B. Should emergency contraceptive pills be available without prescription? j Am. Med. Worn. Assoc. 53\(Suppl. 2), 226–229, 232 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Wells ES, Hutchings J, Gardiner JS eta]. Using pharmacies in Washington State to expand access to emergency contraception. Fain. Plana Perspect. 30, 288–90 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trussell J, Ellertson C. Efficacy of emergency contraception. Fert. Control. Rev 4, 8–11 (1995).
   Google Scholar