Tobacco control policies and reductions in smoking rates and smoking-related deaths

References

• US DHHS. Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years Of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. Atlanta, GA, USA (1989).
   Google Scholar
• US DIIf IS. The Health Benefits of SmokingCessation: airport of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Office on Smoking and Health. Atlanta GA, USA (1990).
   Google Scholar
• CDC. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost and economic costs-United States, 1995–1999. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 51(14), 300–303 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• CDC. Selected cigarette smoking initiation and quitting behaviors among high school students-United States, 1997. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 47(19), 386–389 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Cummings KM, Hyland A. A simulation of the effects of youth initiation policies on overall cigarette use. Am. J. Public Health 90(8), 1311–1314 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• CDC. Best Practices of Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• CDC. Strategies for reducing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, increasing tobacco-use cessation and reducing initiation in communities and healthcare systems: a report of recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 49, (RR–12) (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins DP, Briss PA, Ricard CJ etal Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am. J. Prey. Merl 20 (Suppl. 2), 16–66 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• ••Good overview of studies examining theeffect of different tobacco control policies.
   Google Scholar
• Levy D, Gitchell J, Chaloupka F. The Effects of Tobacco Control Policies on Smoking Rates: A Tobacco Control Scorecard. In: PIRE fribiking Paper Calverton, MD, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• US DIIf IS. Smoking ancl Health in the Americas: a Report of the Surgeon General, in Collaboration with the Pan American Health Organization. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA, USA (1992).
   Google Scholar
• US DHHS. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People: a Report of the Surgeon General Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA, USA (1994).
   Google Scholar
• US DHHS. Healthy People 2010 Centers for Disease Control, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Atlanta, GA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DH Jr, Hasselblad V, Henley SJ, Thun MJ, Sloan FA. Benefits of smoking cessation for longevity. Am. J. Public Health 92(6), 990–996 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Friend K, Polishchuk E. Effect of clean indoor air laws on smokers: the clean air module of the SimSmoke computer simulation model. Tob. Control. 10(4), 345–351 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• •Development of the clean air policy module in SimSmoke is presented.
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Friend K, Holder H, Carmona M. Effect of policies directed at youth access to smoking: results from the SimSmoke computer simulation model. Tab. Contrall0 (2), 108–116 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Friend K. Examining the effects of tobacco treatment policies on smoking rates and smoking related deaths using the SimSmoke computer simulation model. Tab. Control. 11(1), 47–54 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Friend K. A simulation model of policies directed at treating tobacco use and dependence. Med Decis. Making22(1), 6–17 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Development of the cessation module inSimSmoke is presented, along with a cost-effectiveness analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Friend K. A computer simulation model of mass media interventions directed at tobacco use. Prey. Med. 32(3), 284–294 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •The development of the media policy module in SimSmoke is presented.
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Cummings KM, Hyland A. Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model. Prey. Med 31(3), 279–286 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• ••An application of the SimSmoke model toone of the more important policies is presented, with a discussion of how the effects are applied through cessation and initiation.
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Mumford EA, Pesin B. A validation of the SimSmoke simulation model: the role of tobacco control policies in the 1990s. FIRE Working Paper (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Chaloupka F, Gitchell J, Mendez D, Warner KE. The use of simulation models for the surveillance, justification and understanding of tobacco control policies. Healthcare NIanag Li 5(2), 113–120 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• McWhorter WP, Boyd GM, Mattson ME. Predictors of quitting smoking: the NHANES I follow-up experience. J. Clin Epidemiol. 43(12), 1399–1405 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin EA, Pierce JP, Farkas AJ. Duration of smoking abstinence and success in quitting. Natl. Cancerinst. 89(8), 572–576 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Shultz JM, Novotny TE, Rice DP Quantifying the dismse impact of cigarette smoking with SAM-MEC II software. Public Health Rep 106(3), 326–333 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• CDC. Cigarette smoking among adults — United States, 1998. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 49(39), 881–884 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Thun MJ, Myers DG, Day-Lally C et al Age and the exposure-response relationships between cigarette smoking and premature death in Cancer Prevention Study II. In: Changes In Cigarette Related 'Disease Risks And Their Implication For Prevention Anti Control, Smoking and Tobacco Contiv111/bnografir 8 National Cancer Institute, (Ed). National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, 383–475 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Changes in Cigarette-Related Disease Risks and Their Implication for Prevention and Control. In: Smoking and Tobacco Control .11/bnograph 8 Bums D, Garfinkel L, Samet J. (Eds). National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Saffer H, Chaloupka E The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J. Health Econ. 19 (6), 1117–1137 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US DHHS. Reducing Tobacco Use: a Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• •Good overview of the effects of different tobacco control policies.
   Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Friend KB. A simulation model of tobacco youth access policies. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 25(6), 1023–1050 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Fiore M, Bailey W Cohen S etal Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Clinical Practice Guidelines. US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Rockville, MD, USA, (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Evans N, Farrelly M. Do workplace smoking bans reduce smoking? Am. Economic Rev. 89,728–747 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Tobacco Control In Developing Countries. Jha P, Chaloupka E (Eds). Oxford University Press, NY, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes JR. Reduced smoking: an introduction and review of the evidence. Addiction 95\(Suppl. 1) S3—S7 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Levy D, Friend K. A review of the literature on Clean Air Laws: where do we go from here? Health Ed. Res. (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, Bondurant S. Clearing the Smoke: Assessing the Science Base For Tobacco Harm Reduction. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein M. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: The Report of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press, NY, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar