Item response theory and health-related quality of life in cancer

References

• Bode R, Cella D, Lai J-S, Heinemann AW. Developing an initial physical function Item Bank from existing sources. J. Applied Meas. 4,124–136 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bode RK, Lai JS, Cella D, Heinemann AW. Issues in the development of an item bank. Arch. Phys. Med Rehab. 84, S52—S60 (2003). Describes in detail, the procedures that were followed to create a calibrated item bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cella D, Chang CH. A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med. Care 38, 1166–1172 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Describes the benefits of item responsetheory (compared with classical approaches) in the assessment of health-related quality of life.
   Google Scholar
• Lai JS, Cella D, Dineen K, Bode RK, VonRoenn J, Gershon R. Equiprecise measurement of cancer fatigue: An item bank for clinical practice. (In Press) (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hays R, Morales L, Reise S. Item response theory and health outcomes measurements in the 21st Century. Med. Care 38, 1128–1142 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Cohen AS. Equating health status measures with item response theory: illustrations with functional status items. .114ed. Care 38, 1143–1159 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med. Care 38,473–483 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. (1946).
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan N, Cella D, Webster K et al Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with hepatobiliary cancers: the functional assessment of cancer therapy-hepatobiliary questionnaire. J. Clin. Oncol 20,2229–2239 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT—Sp). Ann. Behav. Med. 24,49-58 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Cella D, Lai JS, Chang CH, Peterman A, Slavin M. Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer 94, 528–538 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Cella D, Nowinski CJ. Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Arch. Phy Med. Rehab. 83, S10—S17 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Haley SM, McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. J. Clin. Epidemiol 47,671–684 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson TB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JA MA 273,59–65 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Stommel M, Given C, Given B. Physical functioning and depression among older persons with cancer. Cancer Pract. 9, 11–18 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Given B, Given C, Azzouz F, Stommel M. Physical functioning of elderly cancer patients prior to diagnosis and following initial treatment. Nursing -Res. 50, 222–232 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairey AS, Courneya KS, Field CJ, Mackey JR. Physical exercise and immune system functionin cancer survivors: a comprehensive review and future directions. Cancer 94, 539–551 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courneya KS. Exercise interventions during cancer treatment: biopsychosocial outcomes. &err. Sport Sci Rev. 29,60–64 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Nursing diagnoses: Definition and Classification, 1997–1998. McGraw-Hill, PA, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Cella D, Paul D, Yount S eta]. What are the most important symptom targets when treating advanced cancer? A survey of providers in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Cancer Invest. 21(4), 526–535 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society of Clinical Oncology. ASCO Curriculum Series: Optimizing Cancer Care — The Importance of Symptom Management. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, IA, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fiatarone MA, Marks EC, Ryan ND, Meredith CN, Lipsitz LA, Evans WJ. High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. jAm. Med. Assoc. 263, 3029–3034 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. State-of-the- Science Conference Statement. Symptom Management in Cancer:. Pain, Depression and Fatigue. (2002).
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell F, Sloan JVV, Hamann S. Advances in cancer pain management.CL117: Oncol Rep. 2,351-357 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Virik K, Glare P Pain management in palliative care. Aus. Fam. Phys. 29, 1027–1033 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meuser T, Pietruck C, Radbruch L, Stute P, Lehmann K, Grond S. Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology. Pain 93,247–257 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oncology Nursing Society. Cancer pain management. Oncology Nursing Forum 28, 439–440 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stjernsward J, Teoh N. Current status of the Global Cancer Control Program of the World Health Organization. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 8,340–347 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Syrjala K, Abrams J. Cancer pain. In: Bychosocial Factors in Pain: Critical Perspectives. Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (Eds). The Gildford Press, NY, USA, 301–314 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS et al Assessing sypmtom distress in cancer patients: the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer 89,1634–1646 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabora JR, Brintzenhofeszoc KM, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho—Oncology 10,19–27 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang VT Hwang SS, Feuerman M, Kasimis BS. Symptom and quality of life survey of medical oncology patients at a veterans affairs medical center: a role for symptom assessment. Cancer 88, 1175–1183 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litwin MS, Hays R, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Brook RII. The UCLA ProstateCancer Index: development, reliability and validity of health-related quality of life measure. Med. Care 26,1002–1012 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Stark D, Kiely M, Smith A, Velikova G, House A, Selby P. Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: their nature, associations and relation to quality of life. J. Clin. Oncol 20,3137–3148 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarna L, Padilla G, Holmes C, Tashkin D, Brecht ML, Evangelista L. Quality of life of long-term survivors of nonsmall-cell lung cancer.j Clin. 017C0i 20,2920–2929 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Antoni MET, Lehman JM, Kilboum KM et al Cognitive—behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health PTchology20, 20–32 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S, Sworowski LA et al Randomized, controlled trial of written emotional expression and benefit finding in breast cancer patients. j Clin. Oncol 20,4160–4168 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, Furstenberg CT et al. Neuropsychologic impact of standard-dose systemic chemotherapy in long-term survivors of breast cancer and lymphoma. Psychosomatics 37,137–143 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Harder H, Comelissen JJ, Van Gool AR, Duivenvoorden HJ, Eijkenboom WM, van der Bent MJ. Cognitive functioning and quality of life in long-term adult survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Cancer95, 183–192 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman SL, Byas-Smith MG, Reed BA. Effects of intermediate- and long-term use of opioids on cognition in patients with chronic pain. Clin. Pain 18, S83—S90 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Brealen CB, Phillips KA, Abdolell M, Bunston T, Tannock IF. Cognitive function in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. J. Clin. 017C0i 18, 2695–2701 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner L, Sweet J, Cella D, Doninger N. chemotherapy-related congnitive deficits: a qualitative examination of providers and patients. Ann. Behav. Med. 25, S056 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• George LK, Ellison CG, Larson DB. Exploring the relationships between religious involvement and health. PTchol. Inquiry13, 190–200 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Thoresen CE, Harris AH, Oman D. Spirituality, religion and health: evidence, issues and concerns. In: Faith and Health: PTchological Pempectives. Plante TG, Sherman AC (Eds). Guilford Press, NY, USA, 15–52 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Mo M, Cella D. A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. PTchooncology8, 417–428 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Talcott JA, Rieker PP, Clark JA et al Patient-reported symptoms after primary therapy for early prostate cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J. Clin. Oncol 16, 275–283 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn EA, Cella D. Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: measurement challenges and recommendations. Arrh Phys. Med. Rehab. 84, S35—S42 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Soni MK, Cella D. Quality of life and symptom measures in oncology: an overview. Am. J. Man. Care 8, S560—S573 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Hahn EA, Glendenning GA, Sorensen M etal Quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib versus interferon- a plus low-dose Ara-C: results form the IRIS Study. J. Clin. Oncol 21,2138–2146 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood TJ, Bajetta E, Nortier J eta]. Effects of epoetin a on hematologic parameters and quality of life in cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Oncol 19,2865–2874 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Fayers P, Hand DJ. Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J. Royal Stat. Soc. 165,1–21 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Cella D, Chang C-H, Heinemann AW. Item response theory (IRT): applications in quality of life measurement, analysis and interpretation. In: Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Mesbah M, Cole B, Lee M-L T (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers MA, USA, 169–186 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gershon R. Computerized adaptive testing. .1. App. Measurement (2003) (In Press). Provides a simple explanation of the fundamentals of computerized adaptive testing.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. PTchometrika 31,84–98 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Bock RD. Estimating item parameters and laten ability when responses are scored in two or more nomial categories. Psychometrika 37,29–51 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe F, Pincus T Listening to the patient: a practical guide to self-report questionnaires in clinical care. Arthritis Rheum. 42,1797–1808 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmar SB, Muller M, Schornagel JH, Weyer LD, Aaronson N. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient—physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. jAm. Med. Assoc 285,1351–1357 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Velikova G, Brown J, Booth L et al A randomized study of quality of life measurements in oncology practice — effects on patient well-being and process of care. Proceed. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol 22,728 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen PB, Davis K, Cella D. Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice. Oncology 16,133–139 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Davis K, Cella D. Assessing quality of life in oncology clinical practice: a review of barriers and critical success factors. JCOM 9,327–332 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Velikova G, Brown J, Smith A, Selby P. Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor—patient interactions in oncology. BE j Cancer 86,51-59 (2002). Describes the benefits associated with the administration of in-clinic computerized assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton J, White M, Osoba D. Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 7,513–519 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: cancer-related pain. www.nccn.org. 2003 (Accessed October 2003)
   Google Scholar