Patient recall and recall bias of health state and health status

References

• World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization: chronicle of the World Health Organization 1. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. (1947).
   Google Scholar
• Brown JB, Adams ME. Patients as reliable reporters of medical care process. Recall of ambulatory encounter events. Med. Care 30(5), 400–411 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Caplan LS, Mandelson MT, Anderson LA. Validity of self-reported mammography: examining recall and covariates among older women in a Health Maintenance Organization. Am. J: Epidennol 157(3), 267–272 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Evans C, Crawford B. Patient self-reports in pharmacoeconomic studies. Their use and impact on study validity. PharmacoEconomits 15(3), 241–256 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuz J, Spector LG, Ross JA. Bias in studies of parental self-reported occupational exposure and childhood cancer. Am. J: Epiclemiol 158(7), 710–716 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Thomson CA, Giuliano A, Rock CL et al Measuring dietary change in a diet intervention trial: comparing food frequency questionnaire and dietary recalls. Am. J. Epidemiol 157 (8), 754–762 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Simon GE, Gureje O. Stability of somatization disorder and somatization symptoms among primary care patients. Airh. Gen. PFinatry56(1), 90–95 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Dawson EG, Kanim LE, Sra P et al. Low back pain recollection versus concurrent accounts: outcomes analysis. Spine 27(9), 984–93 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ••Analysis of recall of location, intensity and frequency of pain. It makes important distinctions within the domain, suggesting that characteristics of an event are not necessarily recalled equally.
   Google Scholar
• Brauer C, Thomsen JF, Loft IP, Mikkelsen S. Can we rely on retrospective pain assessments? Am. J. Epidemiol 157(6), 552–557 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• van den Brink M, Bandell-Hoekstra EN, Abu-Saad HH. The occurrence of recall bias in pediatric headache: a comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Headache 41(1), 11–20 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litwin MS, McGuigan IKA. Accuracy of recall in health-related quality-of-life assessment among men treated for prostate cancer. 1 Gun. Oncol. 17(9), 2882–2888 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• ••Longitudinal study that explores a varietyof factors that may influence recall. Findings that recall of specific domains of functioning was low but were moderated by age and education are particularly interesting because time since surgery was not predictive of bias.
   Google Scholar
• Tidermark J, Zethraeus N, Svensson O, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S. Femoral neck fractures in the elderly: functional outcome and quality of life according to EuroQol. Qua" Life Res. 11(5), 473–481 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Perneger TV, Etter JF, Rougemont A. Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: a community based study in Geneva, Switzerland. J. Epidemiol. Corn. Health 51(3), 320–325 (1997). Use of the Health Transition item of the Short Form-36 as a global change item, as suggested in this paper, should be further explored. Although it is less precise than prospective assessments, it may be better than biased reports.
   Google Scholar
• Kreulen GJ, Stommel M, Gutek BA, Burns LR, Braden CJ. Utility of retrospective pretest ratings of patient satisfaction with health status. Res. NUTS. Health 25(3), 233–241 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Lachenbruch PA, Reinsch S, MacRae PG, Tobis JS. Adjusting for recall bias with the proportional hazards model. Methods Inf Med. 30(2), 108–110 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• ••By presenting an analytical approach toaddressing recall, this paper provides an alternative method for exploring the impact of bias on patient reported data.
   Google Scholar
• Barsky AJ. Forgetting, fabricating and telescoping: the instability of the medical history. Anh. Intern Med. 162(9), 981–984 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heathcote PS, Mactaggart PN, Boston RJ, James AN, Thompson LC, Nicol DL. Health-related quality of life in Australian men remaining disease-free after radical prostatectomy. Med. fAust. 168 (10), 483–486 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sprangers MA, Van Dam FS, Broersen J et al Revealing response shift in longitudinal research on fatigue — the use of the thentest approach. Acta Oncol 38(6), 709–718 (1999). As research on response shift accumulates, these findings may be informative to the question of when recalled responses may be acceptable, that is, in cases where there is unlikely to be a response shift.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlin SS. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J. Gun. Epidemiol 43(1), 87–91 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• ••Makes an important distinction between bias versus inaccuracy It also raises the question of the potential impact of recall bias in large epidemiologic studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz NA, Dipko SM. A comparison of response error by adolescents and adults: findings from a healthcare study. Med. Cate 38(4), 374–382 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Eich E, Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford SB. Memory for pain: relation between past and present pain intensity. Pain 23(4), 375–380 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croyle RT, Sande GN. Denial and confirmatory search: paradoxical consequences of medical diagnosis. f Appl. Soc. Psychol. 18,473-490 (1988). Interesting study that demonstrates how even a diagnosis of a fictitious and therefore, asymptomatic disease can lead to bias in recalling risk factors.
   Google Scholar
• Saini J, Kuczynski E, Gretz HF 3rd, Sills ES. Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: perceived effects on sexual function. BMC Womens Health 2(1), 1(2002).
   Google Scholar