35
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Utility values for obesity and preliminary analysis of the Health Outcomes Data Repository

, &
Pages 657-665 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Stein CJ, Colditx GA. The epidemic of obesity. J Clin. EndocrinoL Metab. 89, 2522–2525 (2004).
  • Campbell ML, Mathys ML. Pharmacologic options for the treatment of obesity. Am. J Health Syst. Pharm. 58,1301–1308 (2001).
  • Sculpher M, Drummond M, Buxton M. The iterative use of economic evaluation as part of the process of health technology assessment. J Health Serv. Res. Policy 2, 26–30 (1997).
  • Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1996).
  • Raftery J. NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. Br. Med. J 323,1300–1303 (2001).
  • Torrance GW. Measurement of health-state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ. 5,1–30 (1986).
  • Dolan P Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med. Care. 35,1095–1108 (1997).
  • Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measureof health from the SF-36. J. Health Econ. 21,271-292 (2002).
  • Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health PsychoL 1,61–80 (1982).
  • Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW et aL Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System. Med. Care 40,113–128 (2002).
  • Hawthorne G. Richardson J. Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (ApoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. QuaL Life Res. 8,209-224 (1999).
  • Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, Harper R, Booth A. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. J Health SErv. Res. Policy 4(3) 174–184 (1999).
  • O'Brien BJ, Spath M, Blackhouse G, Severens JL, Dorian P, Brazier J. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. Health Econ. 12,975–981 (2003).
  • •Clear description of how, and why, different utility instruments can produce wildly different results.
  • Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day NA. A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (ApoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann. Med. 33, 358–370 (2001).
  • Neumann PJ, Sandberg EA, Araki SS, Kuntz KM, Feeny D, Weinstein MC. A comparison of HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease. Med. Dec:is. Making 20,413–422 (2000).
  • Longworth L, Bryan S. An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients. Health Econ. 12, 1061–1067 (2003).
  • Oostenbrink RA, Moll HA, Essink-Bot ML. The EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index for permanent sequelae after meningitis: a head-to-head comparison. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 55,791-799 (2002).
  • Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication. QuaL Life Res. 9, 591–601 (2000).
  • Nord E, Wisloff F, Hjorth M, Westin J. Cost-utility analysis of melphalan plus prednisone with or without interferon-ct2b in newly diagnoses multiple myeloma. PharmacoEconomics 12,89–103 (1997).
  • Brazier JE, Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Williams GR. Estimating a preference-based single Index for the impact of Weight on Quality Of Life-Lite (IWOOL-Lite) Instrument from the SF-6D. Value Heath 7,490–498 (2004).
  • Foxcroft DR, Milne R. Orlistat for the treatment of obesity: rapid review and cost-effectiveness model. Obesity Rey 1, 121–126 (2000).
  • Clegg AJ, Colquitt J, Sidhu MK, Royle P, Loveman E Walker A. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery for people with morbid obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health TechnoL Assess. 6(12), 1–153 (2002).
  • Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist J et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann. Surg. 234, 279–291 (2001).
  • Kaplan RM Atkins CJ, Wilson DK. The cost-utility of diet and exercise interventions in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Promotion 2, 331–340 (1998).
  • Salkeld G, Phongsavan P, Oldenburg B et al. The cost-effectiveness of a cardiovascular risk reduction program in general practice. Health Pol. 41,105–119 (1997).
  • Warren E, Brennan A, Akehurst R. Cost-effectiveness of sibutramine in the treatment of obesity. Med. Decis Making 24,9–19 (2004).
  • •• Best available cost-effectiveness model of an obesity intervention.
  • Craig BM, Tseng DS. Cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass for severe obesity. Am. J. Mea'. 113,491–498 (2002).
  • Trakas K, Oh P, Leiter L, Shear NH. Assessing lifestyle crugs for drug benefit formularies: a cost-utility analysis of orlistat and sibutramine for the treatment of obesity in adults. Value Health 4,53 (2001).
  • Van Gemert WG, Adang EMM, Kop M, Vos G, Greve JWM, Soeters PN. A prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of vertical banded gastroplasty for the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes. Surg. 9, 484–491 (1999).
  • Hakim Z, Wolf A, Garrison LE Estimating the effect of changes in body mass index on health state preferences. PharmacoEconomics 20(6), 393–404 (2002).
  • Groesll EJ, Kaplan RM, Barrett-Connor E, Ganiats TG. Body mass index and quality of life in a community of older adults. Am. J. Prey Med. 26,126–129 (2004).
  • Trakas K, Oh PI, Singh S, Risebrough N, Shear NH. The health status of obese individuals in Canada. Int. j Obes. Re/at. Metab. Disord. 225,662–668 (2001).
  • Livingston EH, Ko CY. Use of the health and activities limitation index as a measure of quality of life in obesity. Obes. Res. 10, 824–832 (2002).
  • Torrence GW. Social preferences for heatlh states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socioecon. Plann. Sc]. 10,129–136 (1976).
  • Erickson P, Wilson R, Shannon I. Years of healthy life (Statistical notes, no. 7). US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, MD, USA (1995).
  • Brazier J, Green C, McCabe C, Stevens K. Use of visual analog scales in economic evaluation. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 3, 293–302 (2003) .
  • Hughes D, McGuire A, Elliot H etal. The cost of obesity in the United Kingdom. Drug Assess. 2,327–396 (1999).

Websites

  • British National Formulary www.bnforg.uk (Accessed November 2004)
  • Catalog of preference scores www.hsph.harvard.edu/cearegistry/ (Accessed November 2004)
  • •Good source of utility estimates.
  • Comprehensive table of cost—utility ratios www.hsph.harvard.edu/cearegistry/ (Accessed November 2004)
  • NHS Economic Evaluation Database www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/nhsdhp.htin (Accessed November 2004)
  • •Good, freely available database of economic evaluations.
  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence www.nice.org.uk a(Accessed November 2004)
  • National Co-ordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment www.hta.nhsweb.nhs.uk (Accessed November 2004)
  • Health Outcomes Data Respository (HODaR) www.cardiff-research-consortium.co.uk/hodar (Accessed November 2004)
  • ••Large, commercial database of healthoutcomes data.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.