Healthy year equivalents versus quality-adjusted life years: the debate continues

References

• Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Healthcare Programmes. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford, UK (1997).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. NICE, 2004, London, UK (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mehrez A, Gafni A. Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. 10(2), 148–149 Med. Decis. Making 9, 142–149 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrez A, Gafni A. Evaluating health related quality of life: an indifference curve interpretation for the time trade-off technique. Soc. Sci. Med. 31, 1281–1283 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrez A, Gafni A. The healthy-years equivalents: how to measure them using the standard gamble approach. Med. Decis. Making 11, 140–146 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham K. A note on hye (healthy years equivalent). J. Health Econ. 12, 301–309 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham K. Economics, health and health economics – HYEs versus QALYs – a response. J. Health Econ. 14, 397–398 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafni A, Birch S, Mehrez A. Economics, health and Health econ. – HYEs versus QALYs. J. Health Econ. 12, 325–339 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culyer AJ, Wagstaff A. QALYs versus HYEs. J. Health Econ. 12, 311–323 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes, G. The myth of the HYE. J. Health Econ. 14, 1–7 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliskin JS, Shepard DS, Weinstein MC. Utility functions for life years and health status. Operations Res. 28, 206–224 (1980).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM, Eraker SA. Parameter estimates for a QALY utility model. Med. Decis. Making 5, 191–213 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Wakker P, Johannesson M. Characterizing QALYs by risk neutrality. J. Risk Uncertainty 15, 107–114 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM, Eraker SA. A multiplicative model of the utility of survival duration and health quality. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117, 3–20 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM, Wakker PP, Bleichrodt H, Peters HJM. The zero-condition: a simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Management Science 44, 839–849 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes G, McKenzie L. The use of QALYs in healthcare decision making. Soc. Sci. Med. 28, 299–308 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Arshinoff R, Bell M, Williams JI, Naylor CD. Healthy-year equivalents in major joint replacement: can patients provide meaningful responses? Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 18(3), 467–484 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson M. Quality-adjusted life-years versus healthy-years equivalents – a comment. J. Health Econ. 14, 9–16 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison G. HYE and TTO: what is the difference? Health Econ. 16, 563–578 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson M. The ranking properties of healthy-years equivalents and quality-adjusted life-years under certainty and uncertainty. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 11(1), 40–48 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafni A, Birch S. QALYs and HYEs: spotting the differences. J. Health Econ. 16, 601–608 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ried W. QALYs versus HYEs – what’s right and what’s wrong. A review of the controversy. J. Health Econ. 17, 607–625 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook J, Richardson J, Street A. A cost–utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease – methodological issues and results. Health Econ. 3, 157–168 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sculpher M. Comparing QALYs and HYEs: The Case of Hysterectomy Versus Trancervical Endometrial Rejection. Paper presented to the Health Economists’ Study Group, York, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H. QALYs and HYEs: under what conditions are they equivalent? J. Health Econ. 14, 17–37 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Gafni A. Time preference, the discounted utility model and health. J. Health Econ. 15, 49–66 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Boyd NF, Till JE. Attitude toward quality of survival: the concept of maximal endurable time Med. Decis. Making 2, 299–309 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerrero AM, Herrero C. A semi-separable utility function for health profiles J. Health Econ. 24, 35–54 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) utility models under expected utility and rank-dependent utility assumptions. J. Math. Psychol. 43, 201–237 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Miyamoto J. A characterization of quality-adjusted life-years under cumulative prospect theory. Mathemati. Oper. Res. 28(1), 181–93 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeier PFM, Chapman GB, de Boor AGEM, van Lanschot JJB. A fallacy of the multiplicative QALY model for low-quality weights in students and patients judging hypothetical health states. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 17, 488–496 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Gudex C. Time preferences, duration and health state valuations. Health Econ. 4, 289–299 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson J, Hall J, Salkfeld G. The measurement of utility in multiphase health states. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 12, 151–162 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackeigan LD, O’Brien BJ, Oh PI. Holistic versus composite preferences for lifetime treatment sequences for Type 2 diabetes. Med. Decis. Making 19, 113–121 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Zauberman G. On the making of an experience: the effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation. J. Behav. Decis. Making 13, 219–232 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Zauberman G. Differential partitioning of extended experiences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 91(2), 128–139 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely D. Combining experiences over time: the effects of duration, intensity changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. J. Behav. Decis. Making 11, 19–45 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychol. Rev. 100, 91–108 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafni A. Time in health: can we measure individuals’ pure time preferences? Med. Decis. Making 15, 31–37 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscomb J. Time preference for health in cost–effectiveness analysis. Med. Care 27, S233–S253 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppermann M, Shiboski S, Feeny D, Elkin EP, Washington AE. Can preference scores for discrete states be used to derive preference scores for an entire path of events? An application to prenatal diagnosis. Med. Decis. Making 17, 42–55 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes AM. Measurement of short-term health effects in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 13, 171–174 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabbe PFM, Bonsel GJ. Sequence effects, health profiles, and the QALY model. Med. Decis. Making 18, 178–186 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer A. A test of the QALY model when health varies over time. Soc. Sci. Med. 57, 1697–1706 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Dolan P, Karampela K, Towers I. Does the Whole Equal the Sum of the Parts? Patient-Assigned Utility Scores for IBS-Related Health States and Profile. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, UK (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Towers IMF. The Valuation of Health Outcomes Data from Clinical Trials for Use in Economic Evaluations. PhD thesis, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor IMF. Testing Attitudes to Short-Term Risk for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Scenarios. Paper presented to the Health Economics Study Group, Uxbridge, UK (2002).
   Google Scholar
• McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 299, 1397–1401 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 305, 982–987 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treadwell JR. Tests of preferential independence in the QALY model. Med. Decis. Making 18, 418–428 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Quiggin. Characterising QALYs under a general rank-dependent. J. Risk Uncertainty 15, 151–165 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Todd P, AR Group. Evolution and Cognition. In: Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Stich S (Ed.), Oxford University Press, NY, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond PA, Hausman JA, Leonard GK, Denning MA. Does contingent Valuation measure preferences? Experimental evidence. In: Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Hausman JA (Ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kartman B, Stalhammar NO, Johannesson M. Valuation of health changes with the contingent valuation method: a test of scope and question order effects. Health Econ. 5, 531–541 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey A, Chrisholm D. Willingness to pay as a measure of the benefits of mental healthcare. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 2, 55–58 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O. Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden. Appl. Economics 32(6), 661–669 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelmeier DA, Heller DN. Time preference in medical decision-making and cost–effectiveness. Med. Decis. Making 13, 212–217 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak BCP, Wessling H, Shut D et al. Blood dyscrasias attributed to chloramphenicol: a review of 576 published and unpublished cases. Acta Med. Scand. 192, 409–414 (1972).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DK, Nease RF. Occupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus: a comparative analysis of risk. Am. J. Med. 92, 503–512 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Snell J. Predicting utility. In: Insights in Decision Making. Hogarth RAM (Ed.), Universiy of Chicago Press, IN, USA (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, Tritchler DL, Cummings BJ. Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med. Decis. Making 1, 58–67 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Fryback DG. Whose quality of life? Or whose decision? Qual. Life Res. 12, 609–610 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar