192
Views
68
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Improvement in health-related quality of life in patients with SLE following sustained reductions in anti-dsDNA antibodies

&
Pages 317-326 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • CDC surveillance summaries: morbidity and mortality weekly report. 51, 372–374 (2002).
  • Grossman JM. In: Dubois’ Lupus Erythematosus, Sixth Edition. Wallace DJ and Hahn BH (Eds.), Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, PA, USA, 20–31 (2002).
  • Sergent JS, Lockshin MD, Klemperer MS, Lipsky BA. Central nervous system disease in SLE: therapy and prognosis. Am. J. Med. 58, 644–654 (1975).
  • Sibley JT, Olszynski WP, Decoteau WE, Sundram MB. The incidence and prognosis of central nervous system in SLE. J. Rheumatol. 19, 47–52 (1992).
  • Cook RJ, Gladman DD, Pericak D, Urowitz MB. Prediction of short-term mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus with time dependent measures of disease activity. J. Rheumatol. 27, 1892–1895 (2000).
  • Neuwelt CM, Lacks S, Kaye BR et al. Role of intravenous cyclophosphamide in the treatment of severe neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Am. J. Med. 98, 32–41 (1995).
  • National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2000 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (2002).
  • Isenberg DA, Raviragan CT, Rahman A, Kalsi JK. The role of antibodies to DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 6, 290–302 (1997).
  • Okamura M, Kanayama Y, Amastu K et al. Significance of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies to double stranded and single stranded DNA in patients with lupus nephritis: correlation with severity of renal histology. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 52, 14–20 (1993).
  • Rahman A. Autoantibodies, lupus and the science of sabotage. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43, 1326–1336 (2004).
  • Forger F, Matthias T, Oppermann M, Becker H, Helmke K. Clinical significance of anti-dsDNA antibody isotypes: IgG/IgM ratio of antidsDNA antibodies as a prognostic marker for lupus nephritis. Lupus13(1), 36–44 (2004).
  • ter Borg EJ, Horst G, Hummel EJ, Limburg PC, Kallenberg CG. Measurement of increases in antidouble-stranded DNA antibody levels as a major predictor of disease exacerbation in systemic lupus erythematosus. A long-term, prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 33, 634–643 (1990).
  • Swaak AJ, Groenwald J, Bronsveld W. Predictive value of complement profiles and antidsDNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 45, 359–366 (1986).
  • Bootsma H, Spronk P, Derksen R et al. Prevention of relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 354, 1595–1599 (1995).
  • Bijl M, Horst G, Bootsma H, Limburg PC, Kallenberg CG. Mycophenolate mofetil prevents a clinical relapse in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus at risk. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62, 534–539 (2003).
  • Ho A, Magder LS, Barr SG, Petri M. Decreases in anti-double-stranded DNA levels are associated with concurrent flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 44, 2342–2349 (2001).
  • Linnik M, Hu J, Heilbrunn K, Strand V, Hurley F, Joh T. Relationship between antidsDNA antibodies and exacerbation of renal disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 52(4), 1129–1137 (2005).
  • Kozora E, Thompson LL, West SG, Kotzin BL. Analysis of cognitive and psychological deficits in systemic lupus erythematosus patients without overt central nervous system disease. Arthritis Rheum. 39, 2035–2045 (1997).
  • Mikdashi J, Handwerger B. Predictors of neuropsychiatric damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: data from the Maryland lupus cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43(12), 1555–1560 (2004).
  • DeGiorgio LA, Konstantinov KN, Lee SC, Hardin JA, Volpe BT, Diamond B. A subset of lupus antiDNA antibodies cross-react with the NR2 glutamate receptor in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nature Med. 7(11), 1189–1193 (2001).
  • Kowal C, DeGiorgio LA, Nakaoka T et al. Cognition and immunity; antibody impairs memory. Immunity 21(2), 179–188 (2004).
  • Coutts SM, Plunkett ML, Iverson GM, Barstad PA, Berner CM. Pharmacological intervention in antibody mediated disease. Lupus 5, 158–159 (1996).
  • Weisman MH, Bluestein HG, Berner CM, de Haan HA. Reduction in circulating dsDNA antibody titer after administration of LJP 394. J. Rheumatol. 24, 314–338 (1997).
  • Furie RA, Cash JM, Cronin ME et al. Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with LJP 394. J. Rheumatol. 28, 257–265 (2001).
  • Sem DS, McNeeley PA, Linnik MD. Antibody affinities and relative titers in polyclonal populations: surface plasmon resonance analysis of antiDNA antibodies. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 372, 62–68 (1999).
  • McNeeley PA, Iverson GM, Furier RA et al. Pre-treatment affinity for LJP 394 influences pharmacodynamic response in lupus patients. Lupus 10, 526–532 (2001).
  • Abetimus: abetimus sodium, LJP 394. BioDrugs 17(3), 212–215 (2003).
  • Alarcon-Segovia D, Tumlin J, Furier RA et al. LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 48, 442–454 (2003).
  • Cardiel MH, Tumlin JA, Furie RA et al. Clinical efficacy results from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of LJP 394 in SLE patients with a history of renal disease. Arthritis Rheum. 48, S582 (2003).
  • Wallace DJ, Tumlin JA. LJP 394 (abetimus sodium, Riquent) in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 13(5), 323–327 (2004).
  • Alarcón GS, McGwin G Jr, Uribe A et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic lupus cohort (LUMINA). XVII. Predictors of self-reported health-related quality of life early in the disease course. Arthritis Rheum. 51, 465–474 (2004).
  • UrowitzMB, Gladman DD, Abu-Shakra M, Farewell VT. Mortality studies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results from a single center. III. Improved survival over 24 years. J. Rheumatol. 24, 1061–1065 (1997).
  • Abu-Shakra M, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB. Mortality studies in SLE: how far can we improve survival of patients with SLE. Autoimmun. Rev. 3(6), 418–420 (2004).
  • Ginzler EM, Diamond HS, Weiner M et al. A multicenter study of outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus. I. Entry variables as predictors of prognosis. Arthritis Rheum. 25, 601–611 (1982).
  • Ward MM, Pyun E, Studenski S. Long-term survival in systemic lupus erythematosus. Patient characteristics associated with poorer outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 38, 274–283 (1995).
  • Doria A, Rinaldi S, Ermani M et al. Health-related quality of life in Italian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. II. Role of clinical, immunological and psychological determinants. Rheumatology (Oxford)43, 1580–1586 (2004).
  • Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N. Engl. J Med. 334, 835–840 (1996).
  • Thumboo J, Fong KY, Ng TP et al. Validation of the MOS SF-36 for quality of life assessment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Singapore. J. Rheumatol. 26, 97–102 (1999).
  • Vu T, Escalante A. A comparison of the quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without end stage renal disease. J. Rheumatol. 26, 2595–2601 (1999).
  • Rinaldi S, Doria A, Salaffi F et al. Health-related quality of life in Italian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. I. Relationship between physical and mental dimension and impact of age. Rheumatology (Oxford)43, 1574–1579 (2004).
  • Strand V, Aranow C, Cardiel MH et al. Improvement in health-related quality of life in SLE patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing LJP394 treatment with placebo. Lupus 12, 677–686 (2003).
  • Well-connected. Harvard Medical School (1999).
  • Gilboe IM, Kvien TK, Husby G. Health status in systemic lupus erythematosus compared to rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls. J. Rheumatol. 26, 1694–1700 (1999).
  • DaCosta D, Dobkin PL, Fitzcharles MA et al. Determinants of health status in fibromyalgia: a comparative study with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 27, 365–372 (2000).
  • Strand V, Gladman D, Isenberg D, Petri M, Smolen J, Tugwell P. Outcome Measures in Clinical trials in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 26, 490–497 (1999).
  • Saba J, Quinet RJ, Davis WE et al. Inverse correlation of each functional status scale of the SF-36 with degree of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (m-SLAM). Joint Bone Spine 70, 348–351 (2003).
  • Sutcliffe N, Clarke AE, Levinton C, Frost C, Gordon C, Isenberg DA. Associates of health status in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 26, 2352–2356 (1999).
  • Thumboo J, Fong KY, Chan SP et al. A prospective study of factors affecting quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 27(6), 1414–20 (2000).
  • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care 30, 473–483 (1992).
  • Smolen J, Strand V, Cardiel M et al. Randomized clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies in systemic lupus erythematosus: consensus on a preliminary core set of outcome domains. J. Rheumatol. 26, 504–507 (1999).
  • Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Ong A, Gough J, MacKinnon A. A comparison of five health status instruments in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Lupus 5, 190–195 (1996).
  • Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B et al. Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual. Life Res. 13, 283–298 (2004).
  • Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Fortin P et al. SLICC conferences on assessment of lupus flare and QOL measures in SLE. J. Rheumatol. 23, 1853–1855 (1995).
  • Goldsmith C, Boers M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. J. Rheumatol. 20, 561–565 (1993).
  • Beaton DE, Boers M, Wells GA. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 14(2), 109–114 (2002).
  • Strand V, Scott DL, Emery P et al., for the Leflunomide Rheumatoid Arthritis Investigators Groups. Physical function and health-related quality of life: analysis of 2-year data from randomized, controlled studies of Leflunomide, Sulfasalazine, or Methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 32(4), 590–601 (2005).
  • Strand V. Longer term benefits of treating rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of radiographic damage and physical function over 2 years in clinical trials. Clin. Exp. Rheum. 22, S57–S64 (2004).
  • Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 45, 384–391 (2001).
  • Strand V, Kelman A. Outcome measures in randomized controlled trials in osteoarthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 6, 20–30 (2004).
  • Kujawski SC, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus JT, Ware JE Jr. Determining meaningful improvement in SF-36 scale scores for treatment studies of early, active RA. Arthritis Rheum. 43(7), 1478–1487 (2000).
  • Stucki G, Ewert T. How to assess the impact of arthritis on the individual patient: the WHO ICF. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 64(5), 664–668 (2005).
  • Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 47, 81–87 (1994).
  • Crawford B, Strand V. Improved health-related quality of life following sustained reductions in anti ds-DNA antibodies (dsDNA Ab) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after treatment with LJP394. Abstract presented at International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Research (2004).

Website

  • National Women’s Health Information Center www.4woman.gov/faq/Lupushtm (Accessed May 2005)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.