11
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Towards optimal surgical outcomes

&
Pages 741-749 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • To err is human. In: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, WA, USA (2000).
  • Gawande AA, Thomas EJ. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126, 66–75 (1999).
  • Brook RH, Kamberg CJ, Mayer-Oakes A et al. Appropriateness of healthcare for the elderly: an analysis of the literature. Health Policy 14(3), 225–242 (1990).
  • Rhodes RS, Rice CL. Elements of cost-effective non-emergency surgical care. In: ACS Surgery: Principles and Practices. WebMD, Inc. CT, USA (2003).
  • Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. In: Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Health Administration Press, MI, USA. (1980).
  • Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve healthcare quality: Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on healthcare quality. JAMA 280, 1000 (1998).
  • Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. Health Aff. W96–W114 (2002).
  • Wennberg DE, Kellett MA, Dickens JD et al. The association between local diagnostic intensity and invasive cardiac procedures. JAMA 275, 1161 (1996).
  • Ashton CM, Petersen NJ, Souchek J et al. Geographic variations in utilization rates in Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics. N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 32 (1999).
  • McGlynn EA. There is no perfect health system. Health Aff. 23(3), 100–102 (2004).
  • Leape LL, Park RE, Solomon DH et al. Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of healthcare services? JAMA 263, 669 (1990).
  • Health Services Research Group: small area variations: what are they and what do they mean? Can. Med. Assoc. J. 146, 467 (1992).
  • Leape LL, Park RE, Solomon DH et al. Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of healthcare services? JAMA 263, 669 (1990).
  • McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J et al. The quality of healthcare delivered to adults in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(26), 2635–2645 (2003).
  • Poldermans D, Boersma E. Beta-blocker therapy in non-cardiac surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 353(4), 412–414 (2005).
  • Bunker JP. Surgical manpower: a comparison of operations and surgeons in the United States and in England and Wales. N. Engl. J. Med. 282, 135 (1970).
  • Muir Gray JA. In: Evidence-Based Healthcare: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions. Churchill-Livingston, NY, USA (1997).
  • Reason J. In: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1990).
  • Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialists in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 293(20), 2609–2617 (2005).
  • Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 835 (1996).
  • Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE et al. The role of cost–effectiveness analysis in medicine. JAMA 276, 1172 (1996).
  • Leplege A, Hunt S. The problem of quality of life in medicine. JAMA 278, 47 (1997).
  • Velanovitch V. Using quality of life instruments to assess surgical outcomes. Surgery 126, 1 (1999).
  • Brook RH, Kamberg CJ, McGlynn EA. Health system reform and quality. JAMA 276, 476 (1996).
  • Garvin DA. Afterword: Reflections on the future. Curing Healthcare. In: New Strategies for Quality Improvement: A Report on the National Demonstration Project on Quality Improvement in Healthcare. Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J (Eds), Jossey-Bass Publishers, CA, USA 159 (1990).
  • Kreder HJ, Wright JG, McLeod R. Outcomes studies in surgical research. Surgery 121, 223 (1996).
  • Eiseman B. Surgical decision making and elderly patients. Bull. Am. Coll. Surg. 81, 8 (1996).
  • Pearce WH, Parker MA, Feinglass J, Ujiki M, Manheim LM. The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. J. Vasc. Surg. 29(5), 768–778 (1999).
  • Tu JV, Austin PC, Johnston KW. The influence of surgical specialty training on the outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J. Vasc. Surg. 33(3), 447–452 (2001).
  • Prystowsky J, Bordage G, Feinglas JM. Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon’s training, certification, and experience. Surgery 132(4), 663–672 (2002).
  • Brennan T, Horwitz RI, Duffy FD, Cassel CK, Goode LD, Lipner RS. The role of physician specialty board certification in the quality movement. JAMA 292(9), 108–1043 (2004).
  • Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 288(16), 1987–1993 (2002).
  • Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevensky K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 346(22), 1715–1722 (2002).
  • Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM, Silber JH. Educational level of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. JAMA 290(12), 1617–1623 (2003).
  • Kawakami L. Wide technology gaps are found in hospitals’ safeguards, alerts. Wall St. J. July 12 (2005).
  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM. Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econ. Perspective 14(4), 23–48 (2000).
  • Bates DW, Gawande AA. Patient safety: improving safety with information technology. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(25), 2526–2534 (2003).
  • The non-computer virus. Economist 65–67 (2005).
  • McNeil BJ. Shattuck Lecture – Hidden barriers to improvement in the quality of care. N. Engl. J. Med. 345(22), 1612–1620 (2001).
  • Burton LC, Anderson GF, Kues IW. Using electronic health records to help co-ordinate care. Milbank Q. 82(3), 457–481 (2004).
  • Rosoff AJ. Evidence-based medicine and the law: the courts confront clinical practice guidelines. J. Health Polit. Policy Law. 26(2), 327–368 (2001).
  • Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 294(6), 716–724 (2005).
  • Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM et al. The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Ann. Surg. 228, 320–330 (1998).
  • Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 228, 429–438 (1998).
  • Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SRG, Tosteson ANA et al. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreatico-duodenectomy. Surgery 125, 250 (1999).
  • Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280, 1747–1751 (1998).
  • Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA et al. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann. Surg. 230, 404–411 (1999).
  • Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Hur K et al. The relationship of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Quality Improvement Program. Ann. Surg. 230, 414 (1999).
  • Shahian DM. Improving cardiac surgery quality – volume, outcome, process? JAMA 291(2), 246–248 (2004).
  • Houghton A. Variance in outcome of surgical procedures. Br. J. Surg. 81, 653 (1994).
  • Kraus TW, Büchler MW, Herfarth C. Relationships between volume, efficiency, and quality in surgery - a delicate balance from managerial perspectives. World J. Surg. 29(9), (2005).
  • Bentrem DJ, Brennan MF. Outcomes in oncologic surgery: does volume make a difference? World J. Surg. 29(9), 1210–1216 (2005).
  • Measuring the Quality of Healthcare. In: nknniniiA Statement by the National Roundtable on Healthcare Quality. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, WA, USA (1999).
  • Donaldson MS, Mohr JJ. A cross case analysis In: Exploring Innovation and Quality Improvement in Healthcare Micro-systems. Institute of Medicine, WA, USA (2000).
  • Friedman DM, Berger DL. Improving team structure and function: a key to hospital efficiency. Arch. Surg. 139, 1194–1198 (2004).
  • O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 275, 841–846 (1996).
  • Pisano GR, Bohmer RMJ. Organizational differences in rates of learning: evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Manage. Sci. 47(6), 752–768 (2001).
  • Hallinan JT. Once seen as risky, one group of doctors changes its ways. Wall St. J. June 21 (2005).
  • Rice CL, Rhodes RS. Healthcare economics: the larger context. In: ACS Surgery: Principles and Practices. WebMD, Inc, CT, USA (2004).
  • Resnick AS, Corrigan D, Mullen JL, Kaiser LR. Surgeon contribution to hospital bottom line: not all are created equal. Ann. Surg. 242(4), 530–537 (2005).
  • Ernst CM. The interaction between cost-management and learning for major surgical procedures - lessons from asymmetric information. Health Econ. 12, 199–215 (2003).
  • Newman RM, Traverso LW. Cost-effective minimally invasive surgery: what procedures make sense? World J. Surg. 23, 415 (1999).
  • Altman DE, Clancy C, Blendon RJ. Improving patient safety – five years after the IOM report. N. Engl. J. Med. 351(20), 2041–2043 (2004).
  • Wachter RM. The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after ‘To Err is Human.’ Health Aff. (30 November 2004), W4–534 - W4–545 (2004).
  • Leape LL, Berwick DM. Five years after To Err is Human. What have we learned? JAMA 293(19), 2384–2390 (2005).
  • Breslow MJ, Rosenfeld BA, Doerfler M et al. Effect of a multi-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and economic outcomes: an alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing. Crit. Care Med. 32(1), 31–38 (2004).
  • Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 293(10) 1223–1238 (2005).
  • Todd BA, Resnick AS, Stuhlemmer R, Morris JB, Mullen JL. Challenges of the 80-hour resident work rules: collaboration between surgeons and non-physician practitioners. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 84(6), 1573–1586 (2004).
  • Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O’Neil AC, Cook EF, Lee TH. Does housestaff discontinuity increase the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann. Int. Med. 121(11), 866–872 (1994).
  • Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133(6), 614–621 (2003).
  • Bates DW. Using information technology to improve surgical safety. Br. J. Surg. 91, 939–940 (2004).
  • Rasmussen J. What can be learned from human error reports? In: Changes in Working Life. Duncan K, Gruneberg M, Wallis D (Eds.).Wiley, London, UK (1980).
  • Tang B, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Analysis of errors enacted by trainees during skills training courses. Surgery 138(1), 14–20 (2005).
  • Reed MC, Grossman JM. Limited information technology for patient care in physician offices. Issue Brief Cent. Stud. Health Syst. Change 89, 1–6 (2004).
  • Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Fed. Regist. 69(237), 71702–71704 (2004).
  • Weissman JS, Annas CL, Epstein M et al. Error reporting and disclosure systems: views from hospital leaders. JAMA 293(11) 1359–1366 (2005).
  • Kaushal R, Blumenthal D, Poon EG et al. The costs of a national health information network. Ann. Int. Med.. 143(3) 165–173 (2005).
  • Farley DO, Haims MC, Keyser DJ, Olmsted SS, Curry SV, Sorbero M. In: Regional Health Quality Improvement Coalitions. RAND Health CA, USA (2003).
  • Werner RM, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA 293(10) 1239–1244 (2005).
  • Kaiser Family Foundation/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. In: National Survey on Americans as Healthcare Consumers: An Update on the Role of Quality Information. December (2000).
  • Romano M. AMA sets some ground rules. Mod. Healthc. 35(6), 17 (2005).
  • Benko LB. Blues primed to pay. 29 plans are already paying for performance. Mod. Healthc. 35(6), 16 (2005).
  • Dellinger EP, Hausmann SM, Bratzler DW et al. Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections. Am. J. Surg. 190, 9–15 (2005).
  • Sandlin D. Surgichip-new technology for prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery. J. Perianesth. Nurs. 20(2), 144–146 (2005).
  • Canales MG, Macrio A, Krummel, TK. The surgical suite meets the new health economy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 192(6) 768–776 (2001).
  • Wears RL, Berg MA. Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. JAMA 293(10) 1261–1263 (2005).
  • Friedman TL. The World is Flat. In: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, NY, USA (2005).
  • Christian CK, Zinner MJ, Gustafson ML et al. The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high quality surgical centers. Ann. Surg. 238(4), 447–457 (2003).
  • Rhodes RS. Commentary on weighing the evidence for expanding physician supply. Perspect. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Ther. 17(3), 267–268 (2005).
  • Grogan EL, Stiles RA, France DJ et al. The impact of aviation-based teamwork training on the attitudes of healthcare professionals. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 199(6) 843–848, (2004).
  • Codman EA. In: A study in Hospital Efficiency. Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, USA (1996).

Websites

  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality www.ahrq.gov (Accessed November 2005)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Guideline Clearinghouse www.guideline.gov (Accessed November 2005)
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System www.vaers.hhs.gov (Accessed November 2005)
  • The National Quality Forum www.qualityforum.org (Accessed November 2005)
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services, surgical care improvement project www.medqic.org/scip (Accessed November 2005)
  • United States department of health and human services, centers for Medicare & Medicaid services, surgical infection prevention www.medqic.org/sip (Accessed November 2005)
  • The Leapfrog Group www.leapfroggroup.org (Accessed November 2005)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.