Improvements in measuring the health-related quality of life of cancer patients

References

• Fayers PM, Hopwood P, Harvey A, Girling DJ, Machin D, Stephens R. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials guidelines and a checklist for protocol writers: The UK Medical Research Council experience. Eur. J. Cancer 33, 20–28 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osoba D. What has been learned from measuring health-related quality of life in clinical oncology. Eur. J. Cancer 35, 1565–1570 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staquet M, Berzon R, Osoba D, Machin D. Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials. Qual. Life Res. 5, 496–502 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cull A, Gould A, Chappell J et al. Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice. Br. J. Cancer 85, 1842–1849 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LD, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288, 3027–3034 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz PA. Long-range effect of clinical trial interventions on quality of life. Cancer 74, 2620–2624 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB et al. Automated collection and recording of quality of life data: A comparison of paper and computer touchscreen questionnaires. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 998–1007 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Constitution of the World Health Organisation. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland (1946).
   Google Scholar
• Calman KC. Quality of life in cancer patients – an hypothesis. J. Med. Ethics 10, 124–127 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes JC. Quality of life: conceptual and theoretical considerations. In: Psychosocial Oncology. Watson M, Greer S, Thomas C (Eds). Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK 61–70 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Cella DF, Cherrin EA. Quality of life during and after cancer treatment. Compr. Ther. 14, 69–75 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velikova G, Stark D, Selby PJ. Quality of life instruments in oncology. Eur. J. Cancer 35, 1571–1580 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85, 365–376 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella DF. Quality of life: concepts and definition. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 9, 186–192 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J. Clin. Oncol. 11, 570–579 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. MacLeod CM (Ed.). Columbia Univ. Press, USA (1949).
   Google Scholar
• Priestman TJ, Baum M. Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Lancet 24, 899–900 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Wright EP, Kiely M, Johnston C, Smith AB, Cull A, Selby PJ. Cancer patients with social problems. Qual. Life Res. 14, 373–386 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright EP, Smith AB, Kiely M et al. Psychosocial difficulties, deprivation and cancer: 3 questionnaire studies involving 609 cancer patients. Br. J. Cancer 93, 622–626 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne JP, O’Boyle CA, McGee HM, McDonald NJ, Joyce CRB. Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains. Qual. Life Res. 6, 301–309 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey AM, Bury G, O’Boyle CA, Bradley F, O’Kelly FD, Shannon W. A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQOL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. Br. Med. J. 313, 29–33 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson LE, Bultz BD, Morris DG. Individualized quality of life, standardized quality of life, and distress in patients undergoing a Phase I trial of the novel therapeutic Reolysin (reovirus). Health. Qual. Life Outcomes 3, 7 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Boyle CA, McGee H, Hickey A, O’Malley K, Joyce CRB. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet339, 1088–1091 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macduff C, Russell E. The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population. Qual. Life Res. 7, 761–769 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery C, Pocock M, Titley K, Lloyd K. Predicting psychological distress in patients with leukaemia and lymphoma. J. Psychosom. Res. 54, 289–292 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron D, O’Boyle CA, Kearney M, Moriarty M, Carney D. Quality-of-life measurement in advanced cancer: assessing the individual. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 3603–3611 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad AK, Ring L, Glimelius B, Hansson MG. Focus on the individual – quality of life assessments in oncology. Acta Oncol. 41, 507–516 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index – Cancer: development and validation. J. Clin. Oncol.2, 472–483 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates A, Dillenbeck CF, McNeil DR et al. On the receiving end - II. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) in evaluation of aspects of the quality of life of cancer patients receiving therapy. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 19, 1633–1637 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selby PJ, Chapman JA, Etazadi-Amoli J, Dalley D, Boyd NF. The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Br. J. Cancer 50, 13–22 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes JC, van Knippenberg FC, Neijt JP. Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Br. J. Cancer 62, 1034–1038 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. J. Chronic Dis. 34, 585–597 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cella D. Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scales. Chicago, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, Hernandez L, Tulsky DS, Cella D. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual. Life Res. 8, 181–195 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast quality-of-life instrument. J. Clin. Oncol. 15, 974–986 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella DF, Bonomi AE, Lloyd SR, Tulsky DS, Kaplan E, Bonomi P. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer 2, 199–220 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Osoba D, Aaronson N, Zee B, Sprangers M, te Velde A. Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer. Qual. Life Res. 6, 103–108 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharp LK, Knight SJ, Nadler R et al. Quality of life in low-income patients with metastatic prostate cancer: divergent and convergent validity of three instruments. Qual. Life Res. 8, 461–470 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdardottir V, Bolund C, Brandberg Y, Sullivan M. The impact of generalized malignant melanoma on quality of life evaluated by the EORTC questionnaire technique. Qual. Life Res. 2, 193–203 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergman B, Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Kaasa S, Sullivan M. The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur. J. Cancer 30, 635–642 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kaasa S, Bjordal K, Aaronson N et al. The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy. Eur. J. Cancer 31, 2260–2263 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstead-Fry P, Schultz A. Psychometric analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale in a rural sample. Cancer79, 2446–2452 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taenzer PA, Speca M, Atkinson MJ et al. Computerized quality-of-life screening in an oncology clinic. Cancer Practice 5, 168–175 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buxton J, White M, Osoba D. Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual. Life Res. 7, 513–519 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Newell S, Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW et al. Are touchscreen computer surveys acceptable to medical oncology patients? J. Psychosocial Oncol. 15, 37–46 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allenby A, Matthews J, Beresford J, McLachlan SA. The application of computer touch-screen technology in screening for psychosocial distress in an ambulatory oncology setting. Eur. J Cancer Care 11, 245–253 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P. Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J. Pall. Care 17, 46–52 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AB, Velikova G, Selby P. Computer-assisted questionnaires may facilitate quality-of-life Assessment: at a cost. Compr. Human Behav. (2006) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hahn EA, Cella D, Dobrez D et al. The talking touchscreen: A new approach to outcomes assessment in low literacy. Psycho. Oncol. 13, 86–95 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cull A, Gould A, Chappell J et al. Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice. Br. J. Cancer 85, 1842–1849 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Wright EP, Selby P, Gillibrand A et al. Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 374–382 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. University of Chicago Press, London, UK (1960).
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: NJ, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage, CA, USA (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Bjorner JB, Petersen MA, Groenvold M et al. Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale. Qual. Life Res. 13, 1683–1697 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Aaronson NK et al. The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Eur. J. Cancer42(1), 55–64 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psych. Scand. 67, 361–370 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AB, Wright EP, Rush R, Stark D, Velikova G, Selby PJ. Rasch analysis of the hospital anxiety &depression Scale. Psycho. Oncol. (2006) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA. Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann. Int. Med. 127, 743–750 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer H. Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ, USA (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Waller NG, Reise SP. Computerized adaptive personality assessment: an illustration with the absorption scale. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57, 1051–1058 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki DA, Cella DF. Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Qual. Life Res. 6, 595–600 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB et al. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual. Life Res. 12, 935–52 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai J-S, Cella D, Chang C-H, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale. Qual. Life Res. 12, 485–501 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai JS, Dineen K, Reeve BB et al. An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. J. Pain Symptom Manage.30, 278–288 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Eton DT, Lai JS, Cella D. Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Eval. Health. Prof. 28, 142–159 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clin. Trials 10, 407–415 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wyrwich KW, Wolinsky FD. Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. J. Eval. Clin. Pract.6, 39–49 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J. Clin. Oncol.16, 139–144 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual. Life Res. 5, 555–567 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan JA, Cella D, Hays RD. Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus. J. Clin. Epidem.58, 1217–1219 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Hahn EA, Dineen K. Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening. Qual. Life Res. 11, 207–221 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringash J, Bezjak A, O’Sullivan B, Redelmeier DQ. Interpreting differences in quality of life: the FACT-H&N in laryngeal cancer patients. Qual. Life Res. 13, 725–733 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG. Adaptation to changing health. American Psychological Association, WA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Detmar SB, Aaronson NK, Wever LD, Muller M, Schornagel JH. How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients’ and oncologists’ preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. J. Clin. Oncol. 18, 3295–3301 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Wever LD, Schornagel JH, Aaronson NK. The patient–physician relationship. Patient–physician communication during out-patient palliative treatment visits: an observational study. JAMA 285, 1351–1357 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmar SB, Aaronson NK. Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur. J. Cancer 34, 1181–1186 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velikova G, Brown JM, Smith AB, Selby PJ. Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor–patient interactions in oncology. Br. J. Cancer 86, 51–59 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 714–724 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE et al. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer out-patients. Psychooncology 9, 203–213 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar