Application of economic principles in healthcare priority setting

References

• Mitton C, Donaldson C. Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers. Health Policy60, 39–58 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton T, Cumming J, Devlin N. Priority-setting in New Zealand: translating principles into practice. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy5(3), 170–175 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Do H. Select Health Committee. Second report of session 2001–02 on the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Vol 1: Report and Proceedings of the committee (HC 515-I). The Stationary Office, London, UK (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Hope T, Reynolds J, Griffiths S. Rationing decisions: integrating cost–effectiveness with other values. In: Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. Rhodes R, Battin MP, Silvers A (Eds), Oxford University Press, NY, USA and Oxford, UK (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Drummond M, Donaldson C. In the land of the blind, is one-eyed economics the king? Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy2(2), 73–76 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCulloch D. Scientific prioritization: inescapable judgment. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy2(2), 71–73 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robert G. The United Kingdom. In: Reasonable Rationing: International Experience of Priority Setting in Health Care. Ham C, Robert G (Eds), Open University Press, UK (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Sassi F. Setting priorities for the evaluation of health interventions: when theory does not meet practice. Health Policy63, 141–154 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen P. Quantifying priorities in healthcare: transparency or illusion? Health Serv. Manage. Res.17, 47–58 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Smith J, Mays N, Dixon J et al. A review of the effectiveness of primary care-led commissioning and it’s place in the NHS. Health Foundation Report (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson C, Bryan S, Bate A. Primary-care led commissioning: a treatment without a diagnosis? Speak Out. Health Serv. J. 21 April (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Klein R, Day P, Redmayne S. Managing Scarcity. Open University Press (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hunter DJ. Rationing dilemmas in healthcare. Birmingham National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Hunter D. Rationing: the case of muddling through elegantly. Br. Med. J.311, 811–814 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Ham C, Robert G. Reasonable rationing: international experience of priority setting in healthcare. Open University Press (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Miller P. Managing informed purchasing: a survey of decision makers. J. Manag. Med.11(1), 35–42 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson C, Gerrard K. Economics of health care financing: the visible hand. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Evans RG. Strained mercy: the economics of Canadian medical care. Butterworths, Toronto, Canada (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Sloan F. Valuing Health Care: Costs, Benefits, and Effectiveness of Pharmaceuticals and Other Medical Technologies. Cambridge University Press, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Segal L, Richardson J. Efficiency in resource allocation. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation Report. Victoria, Australia (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Murray C, Lopez A. The Global Burden of Disease. Harvard School of Public Health, MA, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson C, Farrar S. Needs assessment – developing an economics approach. Health Policy25, 141–152 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Cumming J. Core services and priority setting: the New Zealand experience. Health Policy29(1–2), 41–60 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Wordsworth S, Donaldson C, Scott A. Can we afford the NHS? Institute for Public Policy Research, London, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Maynard A, Bloor K. Our certain fate: rationing in health care. Office of Health Economics, London, UK (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Neumann PJ. Using cost–effectiveness analysis to improve health care: opportunities and barriers. Open University Press, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Birch S, Gafni A. The biggest bang for the buck or bigger bucks for the bang: the fallacy of the cost–effectiveness threshold. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy11(1), 46–51 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson C, Currie G, Mitton C. Contra-indications to cost effectiveness analysis in health care. Br. Med. J.325, 891–894 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes G, McKenzie L. The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc. Sci. Med.28, 299–308 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard K, Mooney G. QALY league table: handle with care. Health Econ.2(1), 59–64 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerard K, Smoker I, Seymour J. Raising the quality of cost-utility analyses: lessons learnt and still to learn. Health Policy46(3), 217–238 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann PJ, Stone PW, Chapman RH et al. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses. Ann. Intern. Med.132(12), 964–972 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald R. Using Health Economics in Health Services: Rationing Rationally? Oxford University Press, UK (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Kernick DP. The impact of health economics on healthcare delivery. Pharmacoeconomics18(4), 311–315 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von der Schulenburg J. The influence of economic evaluation studies on health care decision-making. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Buxton MJ, Drummond MF, Van Hout BA et al. Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ.6, 217–227 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J et al. Making difficult choices: are health care resources being deployed according to the principles of cost–effectiveness? Paper presented at the 66th Health Economists Study Group, University of Oxford, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Coast J. Is economic evaluation in touch with society’s health values? Br. Med. J.329, 1233–1236 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley PC. Is cost–effectiveness modeling useful? Am. J. Manag. Care6(2), 250–251 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser LA, Koplan JP, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC. Barriers to using cost–effectiveness analysis in managed care decision making. Am. J. Manag. Care6, 173–179 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin DK, Walton N, Singer PA. Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning. World J. Surg.27, 962–966 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• The House of Commons Health Committee. Second report of session 2001–02 on the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Vol 1: report and proceedings of the committee (HC515-I). The stationary Office, London, UK (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Mitton C, Donaldson C. Priority Setting Toolkit: a Guide to the use of Economics in Healthcare Decision Making. BMJ Books, London, UK (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen D. Marginal analysis in practice: an alternative to needs assessment for contracting health care. Br. Med. J.309(6957), 781–784 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Ruta D, Donaldson C, Gilray I. Economics, public health and health care purchasing: the Tayside experience of programme budgeting and marginal analysis. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy1(4), 185–193 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitton C, Peacock S, Donaldson C et al. Using PBMA in health care priority setting: description, challenges and experience. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy2(3), 121–134 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitton C, Donaldson C. Twenty-five years of program budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974–1999. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy6(4), 239–248 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Mooney G, Russell E, Weir R. Choices for Health Care: a Practical Introduction to the Economics of Health Provision. Macmillan, London, UK (1986).
   Google Scholar
• McIver S, Baines D, Ham C et al. Setting priorities and managing demand in the NHS. Lessons for primary care groups and trusts and their equivalent organizations in Scotland and Wales. Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham. Birmingham, UK (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Craig N, Parkin D, Gerard K. Clearing the fog on the Tyne: programme budgeting in Newcastle and North Tyneside Health Authority. Health Policy33(2), 107–125 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock S. An evaluation of program budgeting and marginal analysis applied in South Australian Hospitals. Centre for Health Program Evaluation. Monash University. Melbourne, Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Ham C, Coulter A. Explicit and implicit rationing: taking responsibility and avoiding blame for health care choices. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy6, 163–169 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter R, Stone C, Vos T et al. Trial of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) to assist cancer control planning in Australia. PBMA Series No 5, Full report & Summary report. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Research Report 19. Melbourne, Australia (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Peacock S, Ruta D, Mitton C, Donaldson C, Bate A, Murtagh M. Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities. Br. Med. J.332(7539), 482–485 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitton C, McGregor J, Conroy M et al. Making choices n healthcare: the reality of scarcity. Hosp. Q.6, 48–54 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson C, Bate A, Mitton C et al. Priority setting in the public sector: turning economics into a management process. In: Managing Improvement in Public Service Delivery: Progress and Challenges. Hartley J (Ed). Cambridge University Press, UK (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ruta D, Donaldson C, Bate A et al. Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: a common resource management framework for doctors and managers? Br. Med. J.330, 1501–1503 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson J, Martin D, Singer P. Evidence, economics & ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations. Healthc. Q.8(2), 50–59 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson JL, Mitton C, Martin DK et al. Ethics & economics: does program budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting? J. Health Serv. Res. Policy(In press).
   Google Scholar
• Jan S. Institutional considerations in priority setting: transactions cost perspective on PBMA. Health Econ.9, 631–641 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Mitton C, Donaldson C. Resource allocation in health care: health economics and beyond. Health Care Anal.11, 245–257 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Jan S. Why does economic analysis in health care not get implemented? Towards a greater understanding of the rules of the game and the costs of decision making. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy2(1), 17–24 (2003).
   Google Scholar