Surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction: comparison of autogenous tissue and expander/implant techniques

References

• Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.106, 1014–1025 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner-Taylor C. The Breast Reconstruction Advocacy Project: one woman can make a difference. Am. J. Surg.175(2), 85–86 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teimourian B, Adham MN. Survey of patient’s responses to breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg.9, 321–325 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. A critical review of 300 patients. Ann. Surg.205(5), 508–519 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Wilkins E, Kim M, Lowery J. Complications in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: two year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.109, 2265–2274 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.105(5), 1640–1648 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll SS, Netscher DT. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.84(6), 886–892 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonyshyn O, Gruss JS, Mackinnon SE, Zuker R. Complications of soft tissue expansion. Br. J. Plast. Surg.41(3), 239–250 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickson MG, Sharpe DT. The complications of tissue expansion in breast reconstruction: a review of 75 cases. Br. J. Plast. Surg.40(6), 629–635 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCraw JB, Horton CE, Grossman JA et al. An early appraisal of the methods of tissue expansion and the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. Ann. Plast. Surg.18(2), 93–113 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Wilkins E, Lowery J et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.106, 769–776 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J. Am. Coll. Surg.204(1), 7–12 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda S, Eberlein TJ, Eriksson E. Breast reconstruction. Cancer74(Suppl. 1), 376–380 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study, “SVEA”, comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.105(1), 66–74; discussion 75–76 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.90(3), 455–462 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll SS, Marchi M. Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal-wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.89(6), 1045–1051; discussion 1052–1053 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejour M, Dome M. Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.87(6), 1054–1068 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suominen S, Asko-Seljavaara S, Kinnunen J et al. Abdominal wall competence after free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap harvest: a prospective study. Ann. Plast. Surg.39(3), 229–234 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind GM, Rademaker AW, Mustoe TA. Abdominal-wall recovery following TRAM flap: a functional outcome study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.99(2), 417–428 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll SS. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.106(3), 576–583 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A. The deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg.46(5), 474–479; discussion 479–480 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Kuzon WM Jr, Wilkins EG. A two-year prospective analysis of trunk function in TRAM breast reconstructions. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.117(7), 2131–2138 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulin WA, Avila RA, Verheyden CN, Grossman L. Evaluation of abdominal wall strength after TRAM flap surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.113(6), 1662–1665; discussion 1666–1667 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster MH. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.103(1), 86–95 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ et al. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br. J. Plast. Surg.50(5), 322–330 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.110(2), 466–475; discussion 476–477 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference? Plast. Reconstr. Surg.115(2), 436–444; discussion 445–446 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.117(3), 737–746; discussion 747–750 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futter CM, Webster MH, Hagen S, Mitchell SL. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br. J. Plast. Surg.53(7), 578–583 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bard M, Sutherland AM. Psychological impact of cancer and its treatment. IV. Adaptation to radical mastectomy. Cancer8(4), 656–672 (1955).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renneker R, Cutler M. Psychological problems of adjustment to cancer of the breast. J. Am. Med. Assoc.148(10), 833–838 (1952).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magistrato R, Di Paola M, Ruffolo F et al. Psychological effects of breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy. Minerva Med.73(24), 1711–1714 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg P, Stolzman M, Goldberg HM. Psychological considerations in breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg.13(1), 38–43 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransfield DD. Breast cancer and sexual functioning: a review of the literature and implications for future research. Int. J. Psychiatry Med.12(3), 197–211 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood P, Maguire GP. Body image problems in cancer patients. Br. J. Psychiatry2(Suppl.), 47–50 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Goin MK, Goin JM. Psychological reactions to prophylactic mastectomy synchronous with contralateral breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.70(3), 355–359 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg MD, Juliano MA, Wise L. Psychological outcome of lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. Am. J. Psychiatry142(1), 34–39 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelson BC. The psychological basis for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Med. J. Aust.1(11), 517–518 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiother. Oncol.25(3), 160–166 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abt V, McGurrin MC, Heinz AA. The impact of mastectomy on sexual self-image and behavior. J. Sex Marital Ther.4, 45 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Silberfarb PM, Levine PM. Psychosocial aspects of neoplastic disease. III. Group support for the oncology nurse. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry2(3), 192–197 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland JH, Holland JC, Chaglassian T, Kinne D. Psychological response to breast reconstruction: expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning. Psychosomatics34, 241–250 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet1, 459–462 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Filiberti A, Tamburini M, Murru L et al. Psychologic effects and esthetic results of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Tumori72, 585–588 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson S, Rodin J, Ariyan S. Treatment considerations in postmastectomy reconstruction: their relative importance to patient satisfaction. Ann. Plast. Surg.33, 263–270 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schain WS. Breast reconstruction. Update of psychosocial and pragmatic concerns. Cancer68(Suppl. 5), 1170–1175 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens LA, McGrath MH, Druss RG, Kister S, Gump F, Forde K. The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.73, 619–628 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard D. Sexual functioning after mastectomy: life vs lab. J. Sex Marital Ther.8, 305–315 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown H. Patient issues in breast reconstruction. Cancer68(5 Suppl.), 1167–1169 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsten LA, Suduikis SV, Donegan WL. Patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Wis. Med. J.91(3), 125–126, 129 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mock V. Body image in women treated for breast cancer. Nurs. Res.42, 153–157 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobf MT, Stahl R. Reconstructive surgery in primary breast cancer treatment. Semin. Oncol. Nurs.7, 200–206 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noguchi M, Earashi M, Ohta N et al. Mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction using a musculocutaneous flap. Am. J. Surg.166, 279–283 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederna PS, Yates WR, Chang P, Cram AE, Ricciardelli EJ. Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous versus breast implant reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg.35, 458–468 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bando M. Experiences of breast reconstruction following mastectomy in cases of cancer and evaluation of psychological aspects of the patients. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho17(4 Pt 2), 804–810 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonsson CO, Engman K, Asplund O. Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.18(3), 317–325 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tykka E, Asko-Seljavaara S, Hietanen H. Patient satisfaction with delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann. Plast. Surg.49(3), 258–263 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon AM, Bouwense CL, McMillan S et al. Comparison of unipedicled and bipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions: assessment of physical function and patient satisfaction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.113(1), 136–140 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs L, Papadopulos NA, Ammar SA et al. Clinical outcome and patients’ satisfaction after simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Ann. Plast. Surg.53(3), 199–204 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.99(3), 686–691 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gylbert L, Asplund O, Jurell G. Capsular contracture after breast reconstruction with silicone-gel and saline-filled implants: a 6-year follow-up. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.85(3), 373–377 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlein TJ, Crespo LD, Smith BL et al. Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann. Surg.218(1), 29–36 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.107(7), 1702–1709 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.107(7), 1710–1716 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.107(5), 1142–1153; discussion 1154–1155 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB, Tuttle TM. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J. Nat. Cancer Inst.96, 443–448 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.(2), CD003647 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Motwani SB, Strom EA, Schechter NR et al. The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the technical delivery of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.66(1), 76–82 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd et al. The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.100(5), 1153–1160 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM, Newman MI, Hughes DB. Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.117(2), 359–365 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.105(3), 930–942 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar