Priority setting in health: origins, description and application of the Australian Assessing Cost–Effectiveness initiative

References

• Sabik L, Reidar KL. Priority setting in health care: lessons from the experiences of eight countries. Int. J. Equity Health7, 4 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson C, Drummond M, Kanavos P. Ensuring Value For Money in Health Care: The Role Of Health Technology Assessment in the European Union. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, Observatory Studies Series No. 11 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Patten S, Mitton, Donaldson C. From the trenches: views from decision-makers on health services priority setting. Health Serv. Manage. Res.18, 100–108 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Mitton C, Donaldson C. Priority Setting Toolkit: a Guide to the Use of Economics in Healthcare Decision Making. Blackwell BMJ Books, Oxford, UK (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hauck K, Smith PC, Goddard M. The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care: a Literature Review. World Bank, DC, USA, HNP Discussion Paper (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Shiell A, Mooney G. A Framework for Determining the Extent of Public Financing of Programs and Services. Discussion Paper No 6, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Ham C, Coulter A. Introduction: international experience of rationing (or priority setting). In: The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Coulter A, Ham C (Eds). Open University Press, PA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Deeble J. Resource Allocation in Public Health: an Economic Approach. A Background Discussion Paper for the National Public Health Partnership (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ham C. Clinical Practice Variations: Assessing the Evidence in Health Care. King’s Fund, London, UK (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Leape L, Park R, Solomon D, Chassin MK, Brook R. Does inappropriate use explain small area variations in the use of health care services? JAMA265, 669–672 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Renwick M, Sadowsky K. Variations in Surgery Rates. Australian Institute of Health, Series 2, Canberra, Australia (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J, Robertson I, Hobbs M. The Impact of New Technology on the Treatment and Cost of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Australia. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Technical Report 10, Melbourne, Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J, Robertson I. Variation in Procedure Rates across Statistical Local Areas in Victoria. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Research Report, Melbourne, Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• McPherson K. International differences in medical care practice. In: OECD Health Care Systems in Transition: The Search for Efficiency. OECD, Paris, France (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J. How much should we spend on health services? In: The Tasks of Medicine: An Ideology of Care. Baume P (Ed.). Maclennan & Petty, Sydney, Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Rice T. The Economics of Health Reconsidered. Chicago. Health Administration Press, IL, USA (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Klein R, Day P, Redmayne S. Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health Service. Open University Press, PA, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Coast J, Donovan J. Conflict, complexity and confusion: the context for priority setting. In: Priority Setting: The Health Care Debate. Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S (Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Maynard A. Rationing health care. Br. Med. J.313, 1499 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Redman S. Setting targets: a three-stage model for determining priorities for health promotion. Aust. J. Public Health19(3), 263–269 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Redman S, Carrick C, Cockburn J, Hirst S. Consulting about priorities for the NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre: how good is the nominal group technique. Aust. NZ J. Public Health21(3), 250–256 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Control Initiative (NCCI). Cancer Control Towards 2000 – The First Stage of a Nationally Coordinated Plan for Cancer Control. Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra, Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. Rationing and the allocation of health care resources. In: Medical Ethics Today. British Medical Association, London, UK (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Coast J, Bevan G, Frankel S. An equitable basis for priority setting. In: Priority Setting: The Health Care Debate. Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S (Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. More and better justice. In: Philosophy and Medical Welfare. Bell J, Mendus S (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Callahan D. What Kind of Life: the Limits of Medical Progress. Georgetown University Press, DC, USA (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood M. Quality of life and resource allocation. In: Philosophy and Medical Welfare. Bell J, Mendus S (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Carter R. Macro approach to economic appraisal in the health sector. Aust. Econ. Rev. 2nd Quarter106, 105–112 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Carter R. The Macro Economic Evaluation Model: an Approach to Priority Setting in the Health Sector. Monash University, Victoria, Australia (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Beaver C, Williams K, Zhao Y, Weeramanthari T. A Model for Addressing Allocative Efficiency Across the Disease Continuum. Northern Territory Health Service, Darwin, Australia (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Segal L, Richardson J. Economic framework for allocative efficiency in the health sector. Aust. Econ. Rev. 2nd Quarter89–98 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Mitton C, Donaldson C. Priority Setting in Regional Health Authorities: the Impact of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis Internationally. Health Economics Program, University of Calgary, Canada (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Mooney G, Gerard K, Donaldson C, Farrar S. Priority setting in purchasing: some practical guidelines. Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (3rd Edition). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost–Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hurley J. Welfarism, Extra-Welfarism and Evaluative Economic Analysis in the Health Sector. Health, Health Care and Health Economics: Perspectives on Distribution. Barer M, Getzen T, Stoddart G (Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Sugden R, Williams A. The Principles of Practical Cost–Benefit Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Culyer A. The normative economics of health care finance and provision. Oxford Review of Economic Policy.5(1), 34–58 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Nord E. Cost–Value Analysis in Health Care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Culyer A. How ought health economics to treat value judgements in their analyses? In: Health, Health Care and Health Economics. Bearer M, Getzen T, Stoddart G (Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J. Empirical ethics verses analytical orthodoxy: two contrasting bases for the reallocation of resources. In: Twenty Second Australian Conference of Health Economists. AHE Society (Ed.). Gold Coast, Australia (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J. Empirical Ethics. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, Australia (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos. Public Aff.26, 303–350 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the “fair innings” argument. Health Econ.6, 117–132 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel P, Gold M, Nord E, Pinto Prades J-L, Richardson J, Ubel P. Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost–effectiveness Analysis of Health. Hastings Center Report Vol 29, NY, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Sheill A. Health outcomes are about choices and values: an economic perspective on the health outcomes movement. Health Policy39, 5–15 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Nord E, Pinto JL, Richardson J, Menzel P, Ubel P. Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Econ.8, 25–39 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R, Stone C, Vos T et al.Trial of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) to Assist Cancer Control Planning in Australia: Full Report. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Research Report 19, PBMA Series No 5, Melbourne, Australia (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Peacock S, Richardson J, Carter R. Setting Priorities in South Australian Community Health II: Marginal Analysis in Mental Health Services. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, Australia (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D, Peacock S, Carter R. Setting Priorities in South Australia Community Health III: Regional Applications of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis. Research Report No.15. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Klein R. Dimensions of rationing: who should do what? Br. Med. J.307, 309–311 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein R, Williams A. Setting priorities: what is holding us back – inadequate information or inadequate institutions? In: The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Coulter A, Ham C (Eds). Open University Press, PA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Cumming J. Defining core services: New Zealand experiences. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy3, 31–37 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Cookson R. McDaid, A, Maynard A. Wrong SIGN, NICE mess: is national guidance distorting allocation of resources. Health Policy49, 63–74 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posnett J, Street A. Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: an approach to priority setting in need of refinement. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy1(3), 147–153 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Haby M, Carter R, Mihalopoulos C, Magnus A, Andrews G, Vos T. Assessing cost–effectiveness (ACE) – mental health: introduction to the study and methods. Aust. NZ J. Psychiatry38, 569–578 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos T, Haby M, Chalamat M et al. Assessing cost–effectiveness (ACE) – mental health: helping policy makers prioritize and plan health services. Aust. NZ J. Psychiatry39, 701–712 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haby M, Vos T, Carter R et al. New approaches to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: methodologies and a specific example from the Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Obesity Project (ACE-Obesity project). Int. J. Obes.30, 1463–1475 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal L, Chen Y. Priority Setting for Health: a Critique of Alternative Models. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, Australia (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Begg SJ, Vos T, Barker B, Stanley L, Lopez AD. The burden of disease and injury in Australia in the new millennium: measuring health loss from diseases, injuries and risk factors. Med. J. Aust.188, 36–40 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers C, Stevenson C, Carter R, Penm R. Disease Costing Methodology Used in the Disease Costs and Impact Study 1993–1994. AIHW cat. No. HWE 7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Cancer Strategy Working Group. Priorities for Action in Cancer Control: 2001–2003. Consultation Draft. Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra, Australia (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson T. The Burden of Disease and Injury in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia (1999).
   Google Scholar