Commonly asked questions: imaging stroke and other types of neurovascular disorders

References

• Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44(3):870-947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanne D, Kasner SE, Demchuk AM, et al. Markers of increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy for acute ischemic stroke in clinical practice: the Multicenter rt-PA Stroke Survey. Circulation 2002;105(14):1679-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringleb P, Bousser M-G, Bath P, et al. Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;25(5):457-507
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;217(2):331-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomalla G, Rossbach P, Rosenkranz M, et al. Negative Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Imaging Identifies Acute Ischemic Stroke at 3 Hours or Less. Ann Neurol 2009;65(6):724-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomalla G, Cheng B, Ebinger M, et al. DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol 2011;10(11):978-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim C, Stanescu R, Dormont D, et al. False-negative diffusion-weighted MR findings in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21(8):1434-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrella JR, Provenzale JM. MR perfusion imaging of the brain: techniques and applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(1):207-19
   Google Scholar
• Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(4):299-309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006;60(5):508-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan A, Goyal M, Azri F, Lum C. State-of-the-Art Imaging of Acute Stroke. Radiographics 2006;26:75-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintermark M, Fiebach J. Imaging of Brain Parenchyma in Stroke. Handb Clinic Neurol 2009;94:1011-19
   Google Scholar
• Latchaw RE, Alberts MJ, Lev MH, et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40(11):3646-78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda T, Sakaki S, Yuh WT, et al. Outcome in acute stroke with successful intra-arterial thrombolysis and predictive value of initial single-photon emission-computed tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19(1):99-108
   Google Scholar
• Davis SM, Donnan GA. Thunderclap headache: CT and lumbar puncture but occasionally more! Stroke 2008;39(4):1396
   Google Scholar
• Frishberg B, Rosenberg J, Matchar D, et al. Evidence-based guidelines in the primary care setting: neuroimaging in patients with nonacute headache. 2012. Available from: http://tools.aan.com/professionals/practice/pdfs/gl0088.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jordan JE. Headache. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28(9):1824-6
   Google Scholar
• Chan CC, Paine M, O'day J. Carotid dissection: a common cause of Horner's syndrome. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2001;29(6):411-15
   Google Scholar
• Biousse V, Touboul P, D'angeljan-Chatillon J, et al. Opthalmologic manifestations of internal carotid artery dissection. Am J Opthalmol 1998;126:565-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina LS, Pinter JD, Zurakowski D, et al. Children with headache: clinical predictors of surgical space-occupying lesions and the role of neuroimaging. Radiology 1997;202(3):819-24
   Google Scholar
• Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 2003;229(2):340-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke 2002;33(8):2003-8
   Google Scholar
• Hollingworth W, Nathens AB, Kanne JP, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for traumatic or atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and vertebral arteries: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2003;48(1):88-102
   Google Scholar
• Waaijer A, Van Der Schaaf I, Velthuis B, et al. Reproducibility of quantitation CT brain perfusion measurements in patients with symptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28(5):927-32
   Google Scholar
• Vagal AS, Leach JL, Fernandez-Ulloa M, Zuccarello M. The acetazolamide challenge: techniques and applications in the evaluation of chronic cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30(5):876-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LM, Elkins JS, Dillon WP, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment of the cerebrovascular reserve: a revisit to the acetazolamide challenges. J Neuroradiol 2008;35(3):157-64
   Google Scholar
• Khan S, Cloud GC, Kerry S, Markus HS. Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78(11):1218-25
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun I, Oates CP, Martin K, et al. The assessment of carotid and vertebral arteries: a comparison of CFM duplex ultrasound with intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Br J Radiol 1992;65(780):1069-74
   Google Scholar
• Provenzale JM, Sarikaya B. Comparison of test performance characteristics of MRI, MR angiography, and CT angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review of the medical literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(4):1167-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum C, Chakraborty S, Schlossmacher M, et al. Vertebral artery dissection with a normal-appearing lumen at multisection ct angiography: the importance of idenifying wall hematoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:787-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed M, Heasly D, Yagmurlu B, Yousem D. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR in imaging and subarachnoid hemorrahge: not a panacea. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(4):545-50
   Google Scholar
• Da Rocha AJ, Da Silva CJ, Gama HP, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging sequences with computed tomography to detect low-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30(2):295-303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung JY, Kim YB, Lee JW, et al. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage with negative initial angiography: a review of 143 cases. J Clin Neurosci 2006;13(10):1011-17
   Google Scholar
• Agid R, Andersson T, Almqvist H, et al. Negative CT Angiography Findings in Patients with Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: when Is Digital Subtraction Angiography Still Needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:696-705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott R, Smith E. Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009;362(12):1226-37
   Google Scholar
• Yoon H, Shin H, Lee M, et al. MR angiography of moyamoya disease before and after encephalodurarteriosynangiosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:495-200
   Google Scholar
• Sugino T, Mikami T, Ohtaki S, et al. Assessment of moyamoya disease using multidetector row computed tomography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22(5):644-9
   Google Scholar
• Ringelstein E, Dittrich R, Stogbauer F. Border zone infarcts. In: Caplan L, Van Gijn J, editors. Stroke syndromes. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2012. p. 564-82
   Google Scholar
• Weissman JL, Hirsch BE. Imaging of tinnitus: a review. Radiology 2000;216(2):342-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vattath S, Shah R, Cure J. A compartment-based approach for the imaging evaluation of tinnitus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:211-18
   Google Scholar
• Poon CS, Chang JK, Swarnkar A, et al. Radiologic diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis: pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(6 Suppl):S64-75
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel SG, Kirsch E, Stock KW, et al. Cerebral veins: comparative study of CT venography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20(2):249-55
   Google Scholar
• Favrole P, Guichard JP, Crassard I, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of intravascular clots in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 2004;35(1):99-103
   Google Scholar
• Leach JL, Fortuna RB, Jones BV, Gaskill-Shipley MF. Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 2006;26(Suppl 1):S19-41. discussion S42-13
   Google Scholar
• Your information resource for MRI safety, bioeffects and patient management. Available from: www.mrisafety.com
   Google Scholar
• Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(6):1447-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClipFinder. Available from: www.clipfinder.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/en/start/htm
   Google Scholar
• Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176(3):593-606
   Google Scholar
• Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, et al. Safety of gadolinium-based contrast material in sickle cell disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34(4):917-20
   Google Scholar
• Cohan RH, Dillman JR, Hartman RP, et al. ACR manual on contrast media version 8. ACR; 2012. p. 8. Available from: www.acr.org/quality-safety/resources/contrast-manual
   Google Scholar
• Brown J. Implementing medication management standards for contrast media contrast agents - An overview. Implementing medication management standards for contrast media contrast agents - an overview 2006. Presented at the 41st ASHP Mid-Year Clinical Meeting Anaheim; 3 December 2006; CA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Hunt CH, Hartman RP, Hesley GK. Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456,930 doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(4):1124-7
   Google Scholar
• Cochran S, Bomyea K, Sayre J. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1385-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortele K, Oliva M, Ondategui S, et al. Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:31-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasser E, Berry C, Talner L, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med 1987;317:845-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei E, Faulkner K. Fetal doses from radiological examinations. Br J Radiol 1999;72(860):773-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshua P, Klein LH. Neuroimaging During Pregnancy. Semin Neurol 2011;31(4):361-73
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde J, River SA, Price D. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005;87(2-3):335-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner L, Lester R, Saldana L. Medical Physics In: Exposure of the pregnant patient to diagnostic radiations: a guide to medical management. Madison; WI, USA: 1997
   Google Scholar
• GE Healthcare. Omniscan package insert. 2005
   Google Scholar
• Webb J, Thomsen H, Morcos S. The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005;15(6):1234-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Santis M, Straface G, Cavaliere AF, et al. Gadolinium periconceptional exposure: pregnancy and neonatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86(1):99-101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ, et al. American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety: 2004 update and revisions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(5):1111-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettmann MA. Frequently asked questions: iodinated contrast agents. Radiographics 2004;24(Suppl 1):S3-10
   Google Scholar
• Moseley ME. Molecular imaging and stroke. Stroke 2009;40(3 Suppl):S30-3
   Google Scholar