Recent advances in minimal-access cardiac surgery using robotic-enhanced surgical systems

References

• Rodriguez A, Rodriguez Alemparte M, Baldi J et al. Coronary stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease and significant proximal LAD stenosis: results from the ERACI II study. Heart 89 (2), 184–188 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Demonstrates the restenosis rate forstenting of the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery is approximately 20 to 30% in the first 6 months after the procedure. The angina recurrence rate was shown to be lower after coronary artery bypass surgery
   Google Scholar
• Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V et al Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 347(8), 561–566 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman NS, Patel NC, Allen KB et al. Evolving revascularization approaches for myocardial ischemia. Am. J. Cardiol 92(9B), N9—N17 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Shennib H. Surgical revascularization for coronary artery disease: are we about to surrender or cross the chasm? Ann. Thorac. Surg 74(4), 1297–1300 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne GH, Kelley WE. Granting clinical privileges for telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 12(1), 17–25 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolessov VI. Mammary artery coronary anastomosis as a method of treatment for angina pectoris. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 54,535–544 (1967).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benetti FJ, Ballester C. Use of thoracoscopy and a minimal thoracotomy, in mammary coronary bypass to left anterior descending artery, without extracorporeal circulation: experience in two cases. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 36,159–161 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisowski M, Drzewiecki J, Drzewiecka- Gerber A et al Primary stenting versus MIDCAB: preliminary report — comparision of two methods of revascularization in single left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg 74(4), S1334-51339 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •Report of a randomized comparison between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) technique and stenting in patients with single LAD artery lesions. The authors highlight a reduced need for reinterventions, and superior freedom from recurrent angina with MIDCAB compared with percutaneous translutninal coronary angioplasty and stenting.
   Google Scholar
• Filsoufi F, Aklog L, Adams DH. Minimally invasive CABG. Curr. Opin. Cardia 16(5), 306–309 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee MJ, Mack MJ. Robotics and coronary artery surgery. Curr. Opin. Cardiol 17(6), 602–607 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack MJ. Perspectives on minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. Current assessment and future directions. Int. J. Cardiol 62\(Suppl. 1), S73—S79 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G et al Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery: the LAST operation. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 9(4), 305–311 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewey TM, Magee M, Edgerton J et alm, Left mini-thoracotomy for beating heart bypass grafting: a safe alternative to high-risk intervention for selected grafting of the circumflex artery distribution. Circulation 104(12 Suppl. 1),199–1101 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fonger JD, Doty JR, Sussman MS, Salomon NW Lateral MIDCAB grafting via limited posterior thoracotomy. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 12(3), 399–404 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe G, Misaki T, Kotoh K et al. Multiple minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting for the complete revascularization of the left ventricle. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 68(1), 131–136 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian VA, Patel NU. Transabdominal mimially invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB). Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg 17(4), 485–487 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morishita A, Shimakura T, Miyagishima M et al. Minimally invasive direct redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 8(4), 209–212 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stahl KD, Boyd WD, Vassiliades TA et al. Hybrid robotic coronary artery surgery and angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann. Thorac. Surg 74(4), S1358—S1362 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riess FC, Bader R, Kremer P et al. Coronary hybrid revascularization from January 1997 to January 2001: a clinical follow-up. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 73(6), 1849–1855 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• ••Highlights that long-term results of hybridrevascularization are limited by the results of percutaneous interventions.
   Google Scholar
• Wittwer T, Cremer J, Boonstra P et al Myocardial 'hybrid' revascularisation with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with coronary angioplasty: preliminary results of a multicenter study. Heart 83(1), 58–63 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton B, Fuller J, Gaer J et al The radial artery as a bypass graft. Curr. Opin. Cardiol 11(6), 591–598 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiou T, Casula R, Glenville B et al New method of grafting the circumflex through lateral MIDCAB with the use of radial loop technique. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg 2,97–98 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takemura H, Watanabe G, Takahashi M et al. Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting: results from 402 patients and the usefulness of gastroepiploic artery composite grafting. Jpnj Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 51(5), 173–177 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann P Huber S, Segl H et al Cardiac MR in robotic heart surgery for preoperative identification of the target vessel and precise port placement — a theoretical model. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 51(4), 204–210 (2003)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mierdl S, Byhahn C, Dogan S et al. Segmental wall motion abnormalities during telerobotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth. Analg. 94(4), 774–780 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felger JE, Chitwood WR, Nifong LW et al. Evolution of mitral valve surgery: toward a totally endoscopic approach. Ann. Thorac. Surg 72,1203–1208 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surgical robotics. Evaluation of the computer motion AESOP 3000 robotic endoscope holder. Health Devices 31(7), 256–268 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marescaux J, Rubino E Telesurgery, telementoring, virtual surgery and telerobotics. Cur,: Ural Rep. 4(2), 109–113 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al Tranasntlantic, robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413,379–380 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan JA, Peacock JC, Kohmoto T et al Robotic techniques improve quality of life in patients undergoing atrial septal defect repair. Ann. Thorac. Surg 4,1328–1333 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Vassiliades TA Jr, Nielsen JL, Lonquist JL. Effects of obesity on outcomes in endoscopically assisted coronary artery bypass operations. Heart Surg. Forum 6(2), 99–101 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula RP Athanasiou T Totally endoscopic robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass on the beating heart in Jehovah's witness and HIV patients: a case report. Heart Surg Forum 7(2), E174—E176 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bemecker 0 et al Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 127(2), 504–510 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Demonstrates the effect of a learning curve in the current cardiac surgery practice with the implementation of robotic technology.
   Google Scholar
• Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d'Attellis N et al First endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting using computer assisted instruments. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 118,4–10 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T et al. Total endoscopic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg. Forum 3(1), 29–31 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula RP, Athanasiou T, Cherian A et al. Totally endoscopic robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass on the beating heart. J. R Soc. Med. 96(8), 400 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Susilo AW, Schulz AP Totally robotic technique in multivessel coronary disease — is it possible? Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 10(1), 92–94 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cichon R, Kappert U, Schneider J et al Robotically enhanced 'Dresden technique' with bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 48, 189–192 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd WD, Desai ND, Kiaii B et al. A comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg 70(3), 839–842 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk V, Gummert JF, Walther T et al. Quality of computer enhanced totally endoscopic coronary bypass graft anastomosis — comparison to conventional technique. Eur. Cardiothorac. Surg. 15(3), 260–264 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkis AH, Kodera K, Kiaii B et al. Robotic surgery, the first 100 cases: where do we go from here? Heart Surg Forum 7(1), 1–4 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kappert U, Cichon R, Schneider J et al Technique of closed chest coronary artery surgery on the beating heart. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 20(4), 765–769 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E et al. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically-enhanced telemanipulation: report of 45 cases. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 123(6), 1125–1131 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Gulbins H et al. Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg 68(4), 1542–1546 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk V, Jacobs S, Gummert JF, Walther T, Mohr FW. Computer-enhanced endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: the da Vinci experience. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 15,104–111 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •Reviews the use of the da Vinci surgical robotic system for coronary artery bypass grafting.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm DH, Detter C, Arnold MB et al.Robotically assisted coronary artery bypass surgery with the ZEUS telemanipulator system. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 15(2), 112–120 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •Reviews the use of the ZEUS surgical robotic system for coronary artery bypass grafting.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A et al. Computer-enhanced 'robotic' cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 121(5), 842–853 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiano RJ Jr, Tabaie HA, Mack MJ et al. Initial prospective multicenter clinical trial of rob otically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 72,1263–1268 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon JW, Howe RD, DuPont PE et al. Application of robotics in congenital cardiac surgery. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Pediatr. Card. Surg. Ann. 6,72–83 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Argenziano M, Oz MC, Kohmoto T et al. Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair with robotic assistance. Circulation 10(Suppl. 1), 11191–11194 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• DeRose JJ, Ashton RC, Belsley S et al. Robotically assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41(8), 1414–1419 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller K, Gutt C, Schaeff B et al. Use of the robot system da Vinci for laparoscopic repair of gastro-esophageal reflux in children. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 12(4), 239–242 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchetta MD, Korst RJ, Altorki NK et al. Resection of a symptomatic pericardial cyst using the computer-enhanced da Vinci surgical system. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 75(6), 1953–1955 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur. Cardiothorac. Surg. 21(5), 864–868 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruurda JP, Hanlo PW, Hennipman A, Broeders IA. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic resection of a benign mediastinal neurogenic tumor: technical note. Neurosurgery 52(2), 462–464 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 75(2), 438–442 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshino I, Hashizume M, Shimada M et al Thoracoscopic thymomectomy with the da Vinci computer-enhanced surgical system. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 122(4), 783–785 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshino I, Hashizume M, Shimada M et al Video-assisted thoracoscopic extirpation of a posterior mediastinal mass using the da Vinci computer-enhanced surgical system. Ann. Thorac. Stag. 74(4), 1235–1237 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer-Greinecker G, Matheis G, Dogan S et al Complications of port-access cardiac surgery. J. Card Surg 14(4), 240–245 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitwood R, Nifong W Minimally invasive and robotic valve surgery. In: Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. Second Edition. Cohn HL, Edmunds LH (Eds), McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, NY, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mehmanesh H, Henze R, Lange R Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 123(1), 96–97 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW Elbeery JE et al Robotic mitral valve repair: trapezoidal resection and prosthetic annuloplasty with the da Vinci surgical system. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 120(6), 1171–1172 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autschbach R, Onnasch JF, Falk V et al The Leipzig experience with robotic valve surgery. J. Card Surg 15(1), 82-87(2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reade CC, Bower CE, Maziarz DM et al Sutureless robot-assisted mitral valve repair: an animal model. Heart Surg Forum 6(4), 254–257 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maziarz DM, Chu VF, Conquest AM et al Use of nitinol U-clips decreases time for annuloplasty band placement in robotic mitral valve repairs. J. Am. Coll Surg. 195\(Suppl. 3), (2002) (Abstract S22).
   Google Scholar
• Torracca L, Ismeno G, Quarti A, Alfieri 0. Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect closure with a robotic system: experience with seven cases. Heart Surg. Forum 5(2), 125–127 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer-Greinecker G, Dogan S, Aybek T et al Totally endoscopic atrial septal repair in adults with computer-enhanced telemanipulation. J Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 126(2), 465–468 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Segesser LK, Tozzi G, Augstburger M, Corno A. Working heart off-pump cardiac repair (OPCARE) — the next step in robotic surgery? Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2(2), 120–124 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saxon LA, De Marco T Cardiac resynchronization: a cornerstone in the foundation of device therapy for heart failure? J. Am. Coll Cardiol 38,1971–1973 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Presents a review of the theory and clinicalexperience with biventricular pacing.
   Google Scholar
• Jansens JL, Jottrand M, Preumont N et al. Robotic-enhanced biventricular resynchronization: an alternative to endovenous cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 76 (2), 413–417 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Rawn C, Krummel TM. The future of medical education is no longer blood and guts, it is bits and bytes. Am. J. Surg 180(5), 353–356 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH et al. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann. Surg. 234(4), 475–484 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan JA, Thornton BA, Hollingsworth KW et al. A cost comparison of robotic atrial septal defect and mitral valve repair versus open cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum 6(3), E62 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Wolf RK, Alderman EL, Caskey MP et al. Clinical and 6-month angiographic evaluation of coronary arterial graft interrupted anastomoses by use of a self-closing clip device: a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 126(1), 168–177 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geis WE Kim HC, McAfee PC et al. Synergistic benefits of combined technologies in complex, minimally invasive surgical procedures. Clinical experience and educational processes. Surg Endosc. 10(10), 1025–1028 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk V, Walther T, Stein H et al Facilitated endoscopic beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting using a magnetic coupling device. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 126(5), 1575–1579 (2003.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd WD, Kodera K, Stahl KD, Rayman R. Current status and future directions in computer-enhanced video- and robotic-assisted coronary bypass surgery. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 14(1), 101–109 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falk V, Diegler A, Walther T et al Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin. Cardid 15(6), 378–387 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack MJ. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285,568–572 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar