Integrating anatomical and functional imaging for the assessment of coronary artery disease

References

• Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123(4), e18–e209 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan TJ. The coronary angiogram and its seminal contributions to cardiovascular medicine over five decades. Circulation 106(6), 752–756 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammann P, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Angehrn W, Roelli H, Sagmeister M, Rickli H. Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator's experience and the catheter size. Catheter Cardiovas. Interv. 59(1), 13–18 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker MW, Iskandar A, Limone B et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 5(6), 700–707 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock MB, Ringqvist I, Fisher LD et al. Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry. Circulation 66(3), 562–568 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringqvist I, Fisher LD, Mock M et al. Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). J. Clin. Invest. 71(6), 1854–1866 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB et al. Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry. Circulation 90(6), 2645–2657 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Harris PJ, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Behar VS, Rosati RA. Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease. Circulation 60(6), 1259–1269 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N. Engl. J. Med. 310(13), 819–824 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117(10), 1283–1291 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonino PAL, de Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(3), 213–224 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 367(11), 991–1001 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw L, Hausleiter J, Achenbach S et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60(20), 2103–2114 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Chow BJW, Abraham A, Wells GA et al. Diagnostic accuracy and impact of computed tomographic coronary angiography on utilization of invasive coronary angiography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imag. 2(1), 16–23 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52(21), 1724–1732 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijboom WB, Meijs MFL, Schuijf JD et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52(25), 2135–2144 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang XM, Chen HW, Hu XY et al. Dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate or rhythm control in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 26(3), 323–331 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J. 31(15), 1908–1915 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L et al. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55(10), 1017–1028 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miszalski-Jamka T, Klimeczek P, Banys R et al. The composition and extent of coronary artery plaque detected by multislice computed tomographic angiography provides incremental prognostic value in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 28(3), 621–631 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulla J, Asferg C, Kofoed KF. Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 27(3), 413–420 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 57(10), 1237–1247 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59(4), 379–387 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CAG, van Pelt N et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52(8), 636–643 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55(23), 2614–2662 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Wall EE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, Bruschke AVG. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 92(9), 2723–2739 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawan S, Dharmashankar KC, Tak T. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing coronary arteries. Clin. Med. Res. 2(3), 173–179 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakuma H. Coronary CT versus MR Angiography: the role of MR angiography. Radiology 258(2), 340–349 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou K, Alkadhi H, Bamberg F, Leschka S, Wintersperger BJ. MRI and CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: indications and applications. Insights. Imaging 2(1), 9–24 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danias PG, Roussakis A, Ioannidis JPA. Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional x-ray angiography: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 44(9), 1867–1876 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance Imaging. Ann. Intern. Med. 152(3), 167–177 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Li K, Liu X et al. Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Heart Coronary MRA at 3.0T: a comparative study with X-ray Angiography in a Single Center. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54(1), 69–76 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 56(12), 983–991 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60(24), e44–e164 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 13(1), 24–33 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 31(2), 261–291 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur A, Latus K, Davies G et al. A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 29(12), 1608–1616 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Rossi A et al. Diagnostic performance of exercise bicycle testing and single-photon emission computed tomography: comparison with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 28(3), 675–684 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ et al. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 99(21), 2742–2749 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman MC, Higuchi T, Reder S et al. Initial Characterization of an 18F-labeled myocardial perfusion tracer. J. Nucl. Med. 49(4), 630–636 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekolla SG, Reder S, Saraste A et al. Evaluation of the novel myocardial perfusion positron-emission tomography tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: comparison to 13N-ammonia and validation with microspheres in a pig model. Circulation 119(17), 2333–2342 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler TH, Schelbert HR, Quercioli A, Dilsizian V. Cardiac PET Imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 3(6), 623–640 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekolla S, Martinez-Moeller A, Saraste A. PET and MRI in cardiac imaging: from validation studies to integrated applications. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 36(1), 121–130 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Di Carli MF. Advances in positron emission tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 11(6), 719–732 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur SR, Reddy P, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Acad. Radiol. 15(4), 444–451 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48(5), 1029–1039 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziadi MC, deKemp RA, Williams KA et al. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58(7), 740–748 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picano E, Molinaro S, Pasanisi E. The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 6, 30–39 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imran MB, Pálinkás A, Picano E. Head-to-head comparison of dipyridamole echocardiography and stress perfusion scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Card. Imaging 19(1), 23–28 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 280(10), 913–920 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaibazzi N, Rigo F, Lorenzoni V et al. Comparative prediction of cardiac events by wall motion, wall motion plus coronary flow reserve, or myocardial perfusion analysis: a multicenter study of contrast stress echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 6(1), 1–12 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold JR, Karamitsos TD, Pegg TJ et al. Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 3(9), 934–943 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A et al. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 9(4), 415–437 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaibazzi N, Rigo F, Reverberi C. Detection of coronary artery disease by combined assessment of wall motion, myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve: a multiparametric contrast stress-echocardiography study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 23(12), 1242–1250 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50(14), 1343–1353 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamon M, Fau G, Nee G, Ehtisham J, Morello R, Hamon M. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J. Cardiovasc. Mag. Res. 12(1), 29 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Mello RAF, Nacif MS, dos Santos AAS, Cury RC, Rochitte CE, Marchiori E. Diagnostic performance of combined cardiac MRI for detection of coronary artery disease. Eur. J. Radiol. 81(8), 1782–1789 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD et al. Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 248(2), 466–475 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams MC, Reid JH, McKillop G et al. Cardiac and coronary CT comprehensive imaging approach in the assessment of coronary heart disease. Heart 97(15), 1198–1205 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54(12), 1072–1084 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 254(2), 410–419 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkor AY, Nicolaou S, Leipsic J, Mancini GBJ. The emerging role of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of coronary perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can. J. Cardiol. 28(4), 413–422 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonino PA, De BB, Pijls NH et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(3), 213–224 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results From the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58(19), 1989–1997 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Leipsic J. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic ct angiography. JAMA 308(12), 1237–1245 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A et al. Usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses confirmed by quantitative coronary angiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 110(7), 971–976 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49(10), 1059–1067 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namdar M, Hany TF, Koepfli P et al. Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J. Nucl. Med. 46(6), 930–935 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slomka PJ, Cheng VY, Dey D et al. Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by coregistered 64-slice coronary CT angiography. J. Nucl. Med. 50(10), 1621–1630 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato A, Nozato T, Hikita H et al. Incremental value of combining 64-slice computed tomography angiography with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging to improve noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 17(1), 19–26 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap J, de Groot JAH, Nieman K et al. Hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris lead to similar treatment decisions. Heart 99(3), 188–194 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience. J. Nucl. Med. 48(5), 696–703 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53(7), 623–632 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Ghadri JR et al. Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur. Heart J. 32(12), 1465–1471 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap J, Kauling RM, Boekholdt SM et al. Incremental diagnostic accuracy of hybrid SPECT/CT coronary angiography in a population with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 14(7), 642–649 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namdar M, Hany TF, Koepfli P et al. Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J. Nucl. Med. 46(6), 930–935 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves AM, Speechly-Dick ME, Kayani I et al. First experience of combined cardiac PET/64-detector CT angiography with invasive angiographic validation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 36(12), 2027–2033 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122(6), 603–613 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Appelman YE et al. Hybrid imaging using quantitative H215O PET and CT-Based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Med. 54(1), 55–63 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaa J, Rummeny EJ, Seemann MD. Whole-body imaging with PET/MRI. Eur. J. Med. Res. 9(6), 309–312 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscher K, Judenhofer MS, Kuhlmann MT et al. Isochronous assessment of cardiac metabolism and function in mice using hybrid PET/MRI. J. Nucl. Med. 51(8), 1277–1284 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carballo D, Nkoulou R, Vincenti G et al. Value of a hybrid PET/MRI in the assessment of cardiac viability. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 14(1), 1–2 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small GR, Wells RG, Schindler T, Chow BJW, Ruddy TD. Advances in cardiac SPECT and PET imaging: overcoming the challenges to reduce radiation exposure and improve accuracy. Can. J. Cardiol. 29(3), 275–284 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small G, Kazmi M, deKemp R, Chow B. Established and emerging dose reduction methods in cardiac computed tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 18(4), 570–579 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beanlands RSB, Chow BJW, Dick A et al. CCS/CAR/CANM/CNCS/CanSCMR joint position statement on advanced noninvasive cardiac imaging using positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis and evaluation of ischemic heart disease - executive summary. Can. J. Cardiol. 23(2), 107–119 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qutub M, Dowsley T, Ali I et al. Incremental diagnostic benefit of resolution recovery software in patients with equivocal myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). J. Nucl. Cardiol. 20(4), 545–552 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutstein A, Navzorov R, Solodky A, Mats I, Kornowski R, Zafrir N. Angiographic correlation of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 20(4), 539–544 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafrir N, Solodky A, Ben-Shlomo A et al. Feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 19(4), 704–712 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaarsma C, Leiner T, Bekkers SC et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59(19), 1719–1728 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong MC, Genders T, Geuns RJ, Moelker A, Hunink MGM. Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 22(9), 1881–1895 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar