The prominent role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease

References

• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. Magnetic resonance, American Society of nuclear cardiology, North American Society for cardiac imaging, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, and society of interventional radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Brindis RG, Chaitman BR, et al. Acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease clinical data standards. Circulation 2013;127:1052-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schulz-Menger J. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in ischemic heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:20-38
   Google Scholar
• Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2614-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantine G, Shan K, Flamm SD, Sivananthan MU. Role of MRI in clinical cardiology. Lancet 2004;363:2162-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D, et al. EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) registry: results of the German pilot phase. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1457-66
   Google Scholar
• Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Nehrke K, et al. Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2313-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1863-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie T, Ishida M, Perera D, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:70-5
   Google Scholar
• Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1343-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller CD, Case LD, Little WC, et al. Stress CMR reduces revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;7:785-94
   Google Scholar
• Lerakis S, Janik M, McLean DS, et al. Adenosine stress magnetic resonance imaging in women with low risk chest pain: the Emory University experience. Am J Med Sci 2010;339:216-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartlage G, Janik M, Anadiotis A, et al. Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-risk chest pain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:803-12
   Google Scholar
• Lerakis S, McLean D, Anadiotis A, et al. Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;21:37
   Google Scholar
• Macura KJ, Szarf G, Fishman EK, Bluemke DA. Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of acute aortic syndromes. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003;24:232-54
   Google Scholar
• Liu PP, Yan AT. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis: prospects for detecting myocardial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1823-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima S, Yamada N, Goto Y. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 1999;341:373-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet 2002;359:1643-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G. Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:7-14
   Google Scholar
• Florian A, Jurcut R, Ginghina C, Bogaert J. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in Ischemic heart disease: a clinical review. J Med Life 2011;4:330-45
   Google Scholar
• Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1657-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, et al. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1630-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt P, Spiess J, Levenson B, et al. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. JACC Imaging 2009;11:1292-300
   Google Scholar
• Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1343-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle S, Nagel E, Voss E, et al. A bi-center cardiovascular magnetic resonance prognosis study focusing on dobutamine wall motion and late gadolinium enhancement in 3,138 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2310-12
   Google Scholar
• Kuijpers D, Ho KY, van Dijkman PR, et al. Dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of myocardial ischemia with the use of myocardial tagging. Circulation 2003;107:1592-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115:1769-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle S, Roes SD, Klein C, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial infarct size and contractile reserve using magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1770-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvanayagam JB, Jerosch-Herold M, Porto I. Resting myocardial blood flow is impaired in hibernating myocardium. A magnetic resonance study of quantitative perfusion assessment. Circulation 2005;112:3289-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regenfus M, Schlundt C, von Erffa J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance and 201 Thallium single photon emission computed tomography for prediction of reversible left ventricular dysfunction in chronic ischaemic heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:1427-34
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson D, Becher H, Selvanayagam J. Assessment of myocardial viability: comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the current era. Heart Lung Circ 2008;17:173-85
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim T, Bülow HP, Hackl T, et al. Diagnostic value of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:208-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Abdel-Aty H, Kriedemann I, et al. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of right ventricular infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1969-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson M, Ubachs JFA, Hedström E. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance. Quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:569-76
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012;379:453-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, et al. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1099-107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton G, Plein S, Nagel E. Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:827-8
   Google Scholar
• Cheong BYC, Muthupillai R, Wilson JM, Sung A. Prognostic significance of delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Survival of 857 patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2009;120:2069-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero J, Xue X, Gonzalez W, Garcia MJ. CMR imaging assessing viability in patients with chronic ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of prospective trials. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2012;5:494-508
   Google Scholar
• Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1447-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad SK, Pennell DJ. Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices. Heart 2004;90:1241-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbel JR, Kanal E. Can patients with implantable pacemakers safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1325-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perazella MA. Current status of gadolinium toxicity in patients with kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:461-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949-3003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar