Coronary computed tomographic angiography in the emergency room: state of the art

References

• Bhuiya FA, Pitts SR, Mccaig LF. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: united States, 1999–2008. NCHS Data Brief 2010;43:1-8
   Google Scholar
• Owens PL, Barrett ML, Gibson TB, et al. Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. Ann Emerg Med 2010;56(2):150-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 2007;115(13):1762-8
   Google Scholar
• Brown TW, Mccarthy ML, Kelen GD, Levy F. An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17(5):553-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigold WG. Coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: the high stakes game of low risk chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(8):893-5
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, Cury RC, et al. Cardiac CT in emergency department patients with acute chest pain. Radiographics 2006;26(4):963-78; discussion 979–980
   Google Scholar
• Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57(19):e215-367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheezum MK, Hulten EA, Fischer C, et al. Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography. Cardiol Clin 2012;30(1):77-91
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58(14):1414-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O’neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(8):863-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulten E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(8):880-92
   Google Scholar
• Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366(15):1393-403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2012;367(4):299-308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4(6):407; e401-433
   Google Scholar
• Fesmire FM, Percy RF, Bardoner JB, et al. Usefulness of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring during the initial emergency department evaluation of patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31(1):3-11
   Google Scholar
• Pope JH, Ruthazer R, Beshansky JR, et al. Clinical features of emergency department patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1998;6(1):63-74
   Google Scholar
• Swap CJ, Nagurney JT. Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2005;294(20):2623-9
   Google Scholar
• Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126(16):2020-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011;123(18):e426-579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010;362(10):886-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann LK, Newman DH, Pleasant WA, et al. Yield of routine provocative cardiac testing among patients in an emergency department-based chest pain unit. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(12):1128-33
   Google Scholar
• Defilippi CR, Rosanio S, Tocchi M, et al. Randomized comparison of a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in a chest pain unit: in-hospital and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37(8):2042-9
   Google Scholar
• Poon M, Cortegiano M, Abramowicz AJ, et al. Associations between routine coronary computed tomographic angiography and reduced unnecessary hospital admissions, length of stay, recidivism rates, and invasive coronary angiography in the emergency department triage of chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62(6):543-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanczyk CA, Johnson PA, Hartley LH, et al. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of early negative exercise tolerance test in patients with acute chest pain seen in the hospital emergency department. Am J Cardiol 1998;81(3):288-92
   Google Scholar
• Miller CD, Lindsell CJ, Khandelwal S, et al. Is the initial diagnostic impression of “noncardiac chest pain” adequate to exclude cardiac disease? Ann Emerg Med 2004;44(6):565-74
   Google Scholar
• Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342(16):1163-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(2):122-36
   Google Scholar
• Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359(22):2324-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59(4):379-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(21):1724-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(25):2135-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Di Carli MF. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nature reviews. Cardiology 2010;7(4):226-36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, Van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(8):636-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK, et al. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2(6):550-7
   Google Scholar
• Dedic A, Genders TS, Nieman K, Hunink MG. Imaging strategies for acute chest pain in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(1):W26-38
   Google Scholar
• Cheezum MK, Hulten EA, Smith RM, et al. Changes in preventive medical therapies and CV risk factors after CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6(5):574-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flor N, Di Leo G, Squarza SA, et al. Malignant incidental extracardiac findings on cardiac CT: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201(3):555-64
   Google Scholar
• Bhargavan M. Trends in the utilization of medical procedures that use ionizing radiation. Health Phys 2008;95(5):612-27
   Google Scholar
• Sarma A, Heilbrun ME, Conner KE, et al. Radiation and chest CT scan examinations: what do we know? Chest 2012;142(3):750-60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff GL. Radiation dose from coronary CT angiography: five years of progress. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4(6):365-74
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell AM, Kline JA. Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5(1):50-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbord SD, Mor MK, Resnick AL, et al. Incidence and outcomes of contrast-induced AKI following computed tomography. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3(5):1274-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(3):190-204
   Google Scholar
• Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176(6):1385-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS, et al. One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16(8):693-8
   Google Scholar
• Schlett CL, Banerji D, Siegel E, et al. Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(5):481-91
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(18):1642-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y, et al. Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an International Multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(5):463-72
   Google Scholar
• Bezerra HG, Loureiro R, Irlbeck T, et al. Incremental value of myocardial perfusion over regional left ventricular function and coronary stenosis by cardiac CT for the detection of acute coronary syndromes in high-risk patients: a subgroup analysis of the ROMICAT trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(6):382-91
   Google Scholar
• Ladapo JA, Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(2):455-63
   Google Scholar
• Goehler A, Ollendorf DA, Jaeger M, et al. A simulation model of clinical and economic outcomes of cardiac CT triage of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(4):853-61
   Google Scholar
• Khare RK, Courtney DM, Powell ES, et al. Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15(7):623-32
   Google Scholar
• Hulten E, Goehler A, Bittencourt MS, et al. Cost and resource utilization associated with use of computed tomography to evaluate chest pain in the emergency department: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013;6(5):514-24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(4):198-224
   Google Scholar
• Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JH, et al. Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department. Curr Cardiol Rev 2011;7(1):2-8
   Google Scholar
• Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol 2013;168(3):2153-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess EP, Brison RJ, Perry JJ, et al. Development of a clinical prediction rule for 30-day cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Ann Emerg Med 2012;59(2):115-25; e111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson J, Innes G, Mcknight D, et al. A clinical prediction rule for early discharge of patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47(1):1-10
   Google Scholar
• Than M, Cullen L, Aldous S, et al. 2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59(23):2091-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 2000;284(7):835-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroules CD, Blaha MJ, El-Haddad MA, et al. Establishing a successful coronary CT angiography program in the emergency department: official writing of the Fellow and Resident Leaders of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (FiRST). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013;7(3):150-6
   Google Scholar
• Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(23):2663-99
   Google Scholar
• Lin FY, Shaw LJ, Dunning AM, et al. Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58(5):510-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. A long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(7):690-701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Rideau AM, Paulson EK, Bisset GS III. Emergency department imaging: current practice. J Am Coll Radiol 2008;5(7):811-16; e812
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher MJ, Raff GL. Use of multislice CT for the evaluation of emergency room patients with chest pain: the so-called “triple rule-out”. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71(1):92-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmus T, Rogalla P, Lembcke A, et al. Low-dose triple-rule-out using 320-row-detector volume MDCT–less contrast medium and lower radiation exposure. Eur Radiol 2011;21(7):1416-23
   Google Scholar
• Savino G, Herzog C, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. 64 slice cardiovascular CT in the emergency department: concepts and first experiences. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006;111(4):481-96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madder RD, Raff GL, Hickman L, et al. Comparative diagnostic yield and 3-month outcomes of “triple rule-out” and standard protocol coronary CT angiography in the evaluation of acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(3):165-71
   Google Scholar
• Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(25):e50-103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi PH, Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, et al. What is the role of calcium scoring in the age of coronary computed tomographic angiography? J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19(6):1226-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(6):675-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner JS, Smeeth L, Kendall JM, et al. NICE guidance. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin. Heart 2010;96(12):974-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbride CB, Cheezum MK, Gore RS, et al. Coronary artery calcium testing in symptomatic patients: an issue of diagnostic efficiency. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2013;6(3):211-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, Budoff MJ, Nasir K. Understanding the utility of zero coronary calcium as a prognostic test: a Bayesian approach. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2011;4(2):253-6
   Google Scholar
• Nasir K, Clouse M. Role of nonenhanced multidetector CT coronary artery calcium testing in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Radiology 2012;264(3):637-49
   Google Scholar
• Min JK, Arsanjani R, Kurabayashi S, et al. Rationale and design of the ViCTORY (Validation of an Intracycle CT Motion CORrection Algorithm for Diagnostic AccuracY) trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013;7(3):200-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MY, Steigner ML, Leung SW, et al. Simulated 50% radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29(5):1167-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A, et al. Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6(3):191-9
   Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(12):1072-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulten EA, Bittencourt MS, Ghoshhajra B, Blankstein R. Stress CT perfusion: coupling coronary anatomy with physiology. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19(3):588-600
   Google Scholar
• Cheng VY, Berman DS, Rozanski A, et al. Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM). Circulation 2011;124(22):2423-32; 2421-2428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Ahmed W, Bamberg F, et al. Comparison of exercise treadmill testing with cardiac computed tomography angiography among patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(2):233-42
   Google Scholar