Angina pectoris: current therapy and future treatment options

References

• Crea F, Pupita G, Galassi AR, et al. Role of adenosine in pathogenesis of anginal pain. Circulation 1990;81(1):164-72
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009;119(3):e21-181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley BS, Simpson CR, McLernon DJ, et al. Five year prognosis in patients with angina identified in primary care: incident cohort study. BMJ 2009;339:b3058
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. Available from: www.acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/statements.htm [Last accessed 24 August 2006]
   Google Scholar
• Loscalzo J. Antiplatelet and antithrombotic effects of organic nitrates. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:18B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Mason DT, De Maria AN. Effects of long-term oral administration of isosorbide dinitrate on the antianginal response to nitroglycerin. Absence of nitrate cross-tolerance and self-tolerance shown by exercise testing. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang D, Jin W, et al. Mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) Glu504Lys polymorphism contributes to the variation in efficacy of sublingual nitroglycerin. J Clin Invest 2006;116:506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Multicenter Study Group. Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1981;304(14):801-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo KK, Yusuf S, Furberg CD. Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1993;270:1589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren SG, Brewer DL, Orgain ES. Long-term propranolol therapy for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1976;37:420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson G, Harry JD, Robinson C, et al. Comparison of atenolol with propranolol in the treatment of angina pectoris with special reference to once daily administration of atenolol. Br Heart J 1978;40:998
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borer JS, Comerford MB, Sowton E. Assessment of metoprolol, a cardioselective beta-blocking agent, during chronic therapy in patients with angina pectoris. J Int Med Res 1976;4:15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss R, Ferry D, Pickering E, et al. Effectiveness of three different doses of carvedilol for exertional angina. Carvedilol-Angina Study Group. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunwald E. Mechanism of action of calcium-channel-blocking agents. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian VB, Bowles MJ, Khurmi NS, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of verapamil and nifedipine in chronic stable angina. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savonitto S, Ardissiono D, Egstrup K, et al. Combination therapy with metoprolol and nifedipine versus monotherapy in patients with stable angina pectoris. Results of the International Multicenter Angina Exercise (IMAGE) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauf-Zachariou U, Blackwood RA, Gunawardena KA, et al. Carvedilol versus verapamil in chronic stable angina: a multicentre trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997;52:95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich PA, McDonald KM, Hastie T, et al. Meta-analysis of trials comparing beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and nitrates for stable angina. JAMA 1999;281:1927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson H, Egstrup K, Nikus K, et al. Antianginal efficacy of the combination of felodipine-metoprolol 10/100 mg compared with each drug alone in patients with stable effort-induced angina pectoris: a multicenter parallel group study. The TRAFFIC Study Group. Am Heart J 1999;137:854
   Google Scholar
• Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C, Guyatt GH. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2000;321:73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005;111:2906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. RITA-2 trial participants. Lancet 1997;350:461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, et al. Seven-year outcome in the RITA-2 trial: coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Clayton T, et al. Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trial. Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. The COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without pci for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trikalinos TA, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Tatsioni A, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373:911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijeysundera HC, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, et al. Meta-analysis: effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy on angina relief. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiopoulos K, Brown DL. Initial coronary stent implantation with medical therapy vs medical therapy alone for stable coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers WJ, Coggin CJ, Gersh BJ, et al. Ten-year follow-up of quality of life in patients randomized to receive medical therapy or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Circulation 1990;82:1647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser GC. CABG: lessons from the randomized trials. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:3
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344:563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnauskas E. Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study. N Engl J Med 1988;319:332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passamani E, Davis KB, Gillespie MJ, Killip T. A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elefteriades JA, Morales DL, Gradel C, et al. Results of coronary artery bypass grafting by a single surgeon in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions < or = 30%. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed P, et al. Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 3-year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial. Circulation 1996;94:135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King SB 3rd, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). N Engl J Med 1994;331:1044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996;335:217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moliterno DJ, Elliott JM. Randomized trials of myocardial revascularization. Curr Probl Cardiol 1995;20:125
   Google Scholar
• van Domburg RT, Foley DP, Breeman A, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Twenty-year clinical outcome. Eur Heart J 2002;23:543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sculpher MJ, Seed P, Henderson RA, et al. Health service costs of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1994;344:927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman EL, Kip KE, Whitlow PL, et al. Native coronary disease progression exceeds failed revascularization as cause of angina after five years in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaitman BR, Rosen AD, Williams DO, et al. Myocardial infarction and cardiac mortality in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) randomized trial. Circulation 1997;96:2162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic status. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARI Investigators. The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Sharp SJ, et al. Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina. Lancet 1998;352:1419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, et al. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI). N Engl J Med 1994;331:1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). CABRI Trial Participants. Lancet 1995;346:1179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SoS Investigators. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Ong AT, van Herwerden LA, et al. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth J, Clayton T, Pepper J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: six-year follow-up from the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS). Circulation 2008;118:381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daemen J, Boersma E, Flather M, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials. Circulation 2008;118:1146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet 2009;373:1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009;360:961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morice MC, Colombo A, Meier B, et al. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006;295:895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windecker S, Remondino A, Eberli FR, et al. Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2005;353:653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaitman BR. Measuring antianginal drug efficacy using exercise testing for chronic angina: improved exercise performance with ranolazine, a pFOX inhibitor. Curr Probl Cardiol 2002;27:527-55
   Google Scholar
• MacInnes A, Fairman DA, Binding P, et al. The antianginal agent trimetazidine does not exert its functional benefit via inhibition of mitochondrial long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase. Circ Res 2003;93:e26-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belardinelli L, Antzelevitch C, Fraser H. Inhibition of late (sustained/persistent) sodium current: a potential drug target to reduce intracellular sodium-dependent calcium overload and its detrimental effects on cardiomyocyte function. Eur Heart J 2004;6(Suppl I):I3-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antzelevitch C, Belardinelli L, Wu L, et al. Electrophysiologic properties and antiarrhythmic actions of a novel antianginal agent. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2004;9:S65-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaitman BR, Skettino SL, Parker JO, et al. for the Monotherapy Assessment of Ranolazine in Stable Angina (MARISA) Investigators. Anti-ischemic effects and long-term survival during ranolazine monotherapy in patients with chronic severe angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1375-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaitman BR, Pepine CJ, Parker JO, et al. for the Combination Assessment of Ranolazine In Stable Angina (CARISA) Investigators. Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina. JAMA 2004;291:309-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone PH, Gratsiansky NA, Blokhin A, et al. on behalf of the ERICA Investigators. Antianginal efficacy of ranolazine when added to maximal treatment with conventional therapy: the Efficacy of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina trial. Circulation 2005;112(suppl II):II–748
   Google Scholar
• Morrow DA, Scirica BM, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, et al. Evaluation of a novel anti-ischemic agent in acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (MERLIN)–TIMI 36 Trial. JAMA 2007;297:1775-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow DA, Scirica BM, Chaitman BR, et al. Evaluation of the glycometabolic effects of ranolazine in patients with and without diabetes mellitus in the MERLIN-TIMI 36 randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2009;119:2032-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szwed H, Sadowski Z, Elikowski W, et al. Combination treatment in stable effort angina using trimetazidine and metoprolol: results of a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study (TRIMPOL II). TRIMetazidine in POLand. Eur Heart J 2001;22:2267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciapponi A, Pizarro R, Harrison J. Trimetazidine for stable angina. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(4):CD003614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole PL, Beamer AD, McGowan N, et al. Efficacy and safety of perhexiline maleate in refractory angina. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of a novel antianginal agent. Circulation 1990;81:1260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treese N, Erbel R, Meyer J. Acute hemodynamic effects of nicorandil in coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1992;20:52-6
   Google Scholar
• The Iona Study Group. Trial to show the impact of nicorandil in angina (IONA): design, methodology, and management. Heart 2001;85:e9
   Google Scholar
• Rajendra NS, Ireland S, George J, et al. Mechanistic insights into the therapeutic use of high-dose allopurinol in angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noman A, Ang DS, Ogston S, et al. Effect of high-dose allopurinol on exercise in patients with chronic stable angina: a randomised, placebo controlled crossover trial. Lancet 2010;375:2161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34(38):2949-3003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borer JS, Fox K, Jaillon P, et al. Antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, an I(f) inhibitor, in stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, multicentered, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 2003;107:817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardif JC, Ford I, Tendera M, et al. Efficacy of ivabradine, a new selective I(f) inhibitor, compared with atenolol in patients with chronic stable angina. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardif JC, Ponikowski P, Kahan T; ASSOCIATE Study Investigators. Efficacy of the I(f) current inhibitor ivabradine in patients with chronic stable angina receiving beta-blocker therapy: a 4-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2009;30:540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roasno GMC, Lionardo F, Pagnotta P, et al. Acute anti-ischemic effect of testosterone in men with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1999;99:1666-70
   Google Scholar
• Webb CM, McNeill JG, Hayward CS, et al. Effects of testosterone on coronary vasomotor regulation in men with coronary heart disease. Circulation 1999;100:1690-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English KM, Steeds RP, Jones TH, et al. Low-dose transdermal testosterone therapy improves angina threshold in men with chronic stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Circulation 2000;102:1906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JG. Models for describing relations among the various statin drugs, low-density lipoprotine cholesterol lowering, pleiotropic effects, and cardiovascular risk. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1009-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deanfield JE, Sellier P, Thaulow E, et al. Potent anti-ischaemic effects of statins in chronic stable angina: incremental benefit beyond lipid lowering? Eur Heart J 2010;31:2650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühling OM, Wang Y, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Improved myocardial function after transmyocardial laser revascularization according to cine magnetic resonance in a porcine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128(3):391-5
   Google Scholar
• Gassler N, Wintzer HO, Stubbe HM, et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularization. Histological features in human nonresponder myocardium. Circulation 1997;95(2):371-5
   Google Scholar
• Sundt TM, Kwong KF. Clinical experience with the holmium: YAG laser for transmyocardial laser revascularization and myocardial denervation as a mechanism. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(1):19-23
   Google Scholar
• Allen KB, Dowling RD, Angell WW, et al. Transmyocardial revascularization: 5-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized multicenter trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77(4):1228-34
   Google Scholar
• Frazier OH, Cooley DA, Kadipasaoglu KA, et al. Myocardial revascularization with laser. Preliminary findings. Circulation 1995;92(9 Suppl):II58-65
   Google Scholar
• Cooley DA, Frazier OH, Kadipasaoglu KA, et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularization: clinical experience with twelve-month follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111(4):791-7; discussion 797-9
   Google Scholar
• Dziuk M, el-Deeb H, Britton KE, et al. Clinical outcome of patients after transmyocardial laser revascularization alone and combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2003;15(90):534-6
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson T, Augustinsson L-E, Mannheimer C. Spinal cord stimulation in severe angina pectoris: presentation of current studies, indications, and clinical experience. Pain 1996;67:169-79
   Google Scholar
• Murray S, Carson KG, Ewings PD, et al. Spinal cord stimulation significantly decreases the need for acute hospital admission for chest pain in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Heart 1999;82:89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson JE, Brooksby P, Waterhous D, et al. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation for severe angina: a study of its effects on symptoms, exercise tolerance and degree of ischemia. Eur Heart J 1992;12:628-33
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Hole P, Oxhoj H. Does pain relief with spinal cord stimulation for angina conceal myocardial infarction? Br Heart J 1994;71:419-21
   Google Scholar
• Foreman RD, Linderoth B, Ardell JL, et al. Modulation of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris. Cardiovasc Res 2000;47:367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray S, Collins PD, James MA. Neurostimulation treatment for angina pectoris. Heart 2000;83:217
   Google Scholar
• Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Augustinsson LE, et al. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study. Circulation 1998;97:1157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza GA, Sestito A, Sgueglia GA, et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on spontaneous and stress-induced angina and ‘ischemia-like' ST-segment depression in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Eur Heart J 2005;26:983
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD, et al. An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braith RW, Conti CR, Nichols WW, et al. Enhanced external counterpulsation improves peripheral artery flow-mediated dilation in patients with chronic angina: a randomized sham-controlled study. Circulation 2010;122:1612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora RR, Chou TM, Jain D, et al. The multicenter study of enhanced external counterpulsation (MUST-EECP): effect of EECP on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and anginal episodes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soran O, Kennard ED, Kfoury AG, et al. Two-year clinical outcomes after enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy in patients with refractory angina pectoris and left ventricular dysfunction (report from the International EECP Patient Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006;97:17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs S, Baffour R, Zhou YF, et al. Transendocardial delivery of autologous bone marrow enhances collateral perfusion and regional function in pigs with chronic experimental myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37(6):1726-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva GV, Litovsky S, Assad JA, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into an endothelial phenotype, enhance vascular density, and improve heart function in a canine chronic ischemia model. Circulation 2005;111(2):150-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeres SL, Bax JJ, Dibbets P, et al. Effect of intramyocardial injection of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells on perfusion, function, and viability in patients with drug-refractory chronic ischemia. J Nucl Med 2006;47(4):574-80
   Google Scholar
• van Ramshorst J, Bax JJ, Beeres SL, et al. Intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection for chronic myocardial ischemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009;301:1997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thollon C, Cambarrat C, Vian J, et al. Electrophysiological effects of S 16257, a novel sino-atrial node modulator, on rabbit and guinea-pig cardiac preparations: comparison with UL-FS 49. Br J Pharmacol 1994;112:37-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar