Role of CT angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis

References

• Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessì M, Noce A, Bertucci P, et al. Atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, and inflammation: the significant role of polyunsaturated fatty acids. ISRN Inflamm 2013;2013:191823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blankenhorn DH, Stern D. Calcification of the coronary arteries. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1959;81(5):772-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alwan AD, Galea G, Stucker S. Development at risk: addressing noncommunicable diseases at the United Nations high-level meeting. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89(8):546-546A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Ng KH. Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part II: clinical applications in coronary artery disease. Singapore Med J 2010;51(4):282-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton-Craig CR, Friedman D, Achenbach S. Cardiac computed tomography – evidence, limitations and clinical application. Heart Lung Circ 2012;21(2):70-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen A, Petersen H, Diederichsen AC, et al. Hybrid CT angiography and quantitative 15O-water PET for assessment of coronary artery disease: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40(12):1894-904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsfield GN. Historical notes on computerized axial tomography. J Can Assoc Radiol 1976;27:135-42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman LW. Principles of CT and CT technology. J Nucl Med Technol 2007;35(3):115-28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkins WS, Chin C, Rudd JH, et al. What can we learn about valvular heart disease from PET/CT? Future Cardiol 2013;9(5):657-67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hacker M, Becker C. The incremental value of coronary artery calcium scores to myocardial single photon emission computer tomography in risk assessment. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18(4):700-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lell MM, Anders K, Uder M, et al. New techniques in CT angiography. Radiographics 2006;26(Suppl 1):S45-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29(2):191-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246(3):742-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, et al. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 2001;220(3):712-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 2007;34(11):4526-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldridge MD, Waddington WW, Dickson JC, et al. Clinical evaluation of reducing acquisition time on single-photon emission computed tomography image quality using proprietary resolution recovery software. Nucl Med Commun 2013;34(11):1116-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takx RA, Willemink MJ, Nathoe HM, et al. The effect of iterative reconstruction on quantitative computed tomography assessment of coronary plaque composition. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;30(1):155-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou SL, Garcia-Garcia HM, Rossi A, et al. Reproducibility of computed tomography angiography data analysis using semiautomated plaque quantification software: implications for the design of longitudinal studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29(5):1095-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srichai MB, Chandarana H, Donnino R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography angiography for myocardial infarction. World J Radiol 2013;5(8):295-303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Kitagawa T, Ohashi N, et al. Noncalcified atherosclerotic lesions with vulnerable characteristics detected by coronary CT angiography and future coronary events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013;7(3):192-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajiah P, Schoenhagen P. The role of computed tomography in pre-procedural planning of cardiovascular surgery and intervention. Insights Imaging 2013;4(5):671-89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin GD. Emerging and evolving roles for CT in screening for coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10(12):943-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Better N, Webb MB, Prior DL, et al. A new algorithm for the management of stable coronary artery disease incorporating CT coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve: how we can improve outcomes and reduce costs. Comment. Med J Aust 2011;194(12):668-9; author reply 669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westwood M, Al M, Burgers L, et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of new-generation computed tomography scanners for imaging in coronary artery disease and congenital heart disease: somatom Definition Flash, Aquilion ONE, Brilliance iCT and Discovery CT750 HD. Health Technol Assess 2013;17(9):1-243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeshina AM, Hashim R, Khalid NE, Abidin SZ. Multimodal 3-D reconstruction of human anatomical structures using surlens visualization system. Interdiscip Sci 2013;5(1):23-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Arsanjani R, Kurabayashi S, et al. Rationale and design of the ViCTORY (validation of an intracycle CT motion correction algorithm for diagnostic accuracy) trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013;7(3):200-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CM, Blum A, Abbara S. Patient preparation and scanning techniques. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48(4):675-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Cury RC, Pena AJ. Coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2006;47(5):797-806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabarudin A, Sun Z. Beta-blocker administration protocol for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography. World J Cardiol 2013;5(12):453-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheezum MK, Hulten EA, Smith RM, et al. Changes in preventive medical therapies and CV risk factors after CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6(5):574-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pen A, Yam Y, Chen L, et al. Discordance between Framingham Risk Score and atherosclerotic plaque burden. Eur Heart J 2013;34(14):1075-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorgun H, Canpolat U, Aytemir K, et al. Prognosis of patients with mild-moderate coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiol 2013;168(2):1195-200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou ZH, Lu B, Gao Y, et al. Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography and calcium score for major adverse cardiac events in outpatients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;10):990-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. A long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(7):690-701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman CE, de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, et al. Prognostic value of coronary vessel dominance in relation to significant coronary artery disease determined with non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2012;33(11):1367-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Werkhoven JM, Bax JJ, Nucifora G, et al. The value of multi-slice-computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16(6):970-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang JC, Min JK, Lin FY, et al. Sex comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multicenter ACCURACY trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6(4):246-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Azevedo CF, Hadlich MS, Bezerra SG, et al. Prognostic value of CT angiography in patients with inconclusive functional stress tests. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(7):740-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix K, Jensen JM, Poulsen S, et al. Coronary dual source multi detector computed tomography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: prevalence of incidental extra-cardiac findings. Eur J Radiol 2011;80(1):109-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic Performance of 64-Detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary prospective multicenter ACCURACY (assessment by coronary computed individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(21):1724-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Ma Y, Fan W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2014;24(1):3-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KJ, Choi SI, Lee MS, et al. The prevalence and characteristics of coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic subjects classified as low risk based on traditional risk stratification algorithm: assessment with coronary CT angiography. Heart 2013;99(15):1113-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koulaouzidis G, Charisopoulou D, Maffrett S, et al. Coronary artery calcification progression in asymptomatic individuals with initial score of zero. Angiology 2013;64(7):494-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, et al. Rationale and design of the CONFIRM (Coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter) registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(2):84-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharampal AS, Papadopoulou SL, Rossi A, et al. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography to detect and exclude left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2013;23(11):2934-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(6):675-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaha M, Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(6):692-700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Gul KM. Expert review on coronary calcium. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4(2):315-24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBride CB, Cheezum MK, Gore RS, et al. Coronary artery calcium testing in symptomatic patients: an issue of diagnostic efficiency. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2013;6(3):211-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mouden M, Timmer JR, Reiffers S, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring to exclude flow-limiting coronary artery disease in symptomatic stable patients at low or intermediate risk. Radiology 2013;269(1):77-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Kate GJ, Caliskan K, Dedic A, et al. Computed tomography coronary imaging as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure of unknown aetiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2013;15(9):1028-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laspas F, Roussakis A, Kritikos N, et al. Imaging of coronary artery bypass grafts by computed tomography coronary angiography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2013;42(6):241-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhuiya F, Pitts SR, McCaig LF. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008. NCHS data brief, no 43. National Center for Health Statistics; Hyattsville, MD, USA; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (rule out myocardial infarction using computer assisted tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(18):1642-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samad Z, Hakeem A, Mahmood SS, et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of computed tomography angiography as a diagnostic triage tool for patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19(2):364-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest VL, Scuffham PA, Hachamovitch R, Marwick TH. Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(5):549-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JK, Medina HM, Nørgaard BL, et al. Association of ischemic stroke to coronary artery disease using computed tomography coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol 2012;160(3):171-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58(14):1414-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heye T, Kauczor HU, Szabo G, Hosch W. Computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts: robustness in emergency and clinical routine settings. Acta Radiol 2013; Epub ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morcillo Serra C, Roca JM, Masip J, et al. Detection of silent coronary artery disease by computed tomographic scan: coronary artery calcium versus noninvasive coronary angiography. Coron Artery Dis 2011;22(1):73-80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogler N, Meyer M, Fink C, et al. Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Rofo 2013;185(8):726-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leening MJ, Kavousi M, Steyerberg EW, et al. [Evaluation of newer risk markers for coronary heart disease: the Rotterdam Study]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2013;157(27):A6123
   Google Scholar
• Nasis A, Mottram PM, Cameron JD, Seneviratne SK. Current and evolving clinical applications of multidetector cardiac CT in assessment of structural heart disease. Radiology 2013;267(1):11-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi TY, Malpeso J, Li D, et al. Radiation dose reduction with increasing utilization of prospective gating in 64-multidetector cardiac computed tomography angiography. J Cardiovasc Comp Tomog 2011;5:264-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahinarslan A, Erbas G, Kocaman SA, et al. Comparison of radiation-induced damage between CT angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Acta Cardiol 2013;68(3):291-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshhajra BB, Lee AM, Engel LC, et al. Radiation dose reduction in pediatric cardiac computed tomography: experience from a tertiary medical center. Pediatr Cardiol 2014;35(1):171-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Knaapen P. Diagnosing coronary artery disease with hybrid PET/CT: it takes two to tango. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20(5):874-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Harms HJ, et al. Effect of cardiac hybrid 15O-water PET/CT imaging on downstream referral for invasive coronary angiography and revascularization rate. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15(2):170-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudarski S, Fink C, Sueselbeck T, et al. Quantitative analysis of coronary plaque composition by dual-source CT in patients with acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared to patients with stable coronary artery disease correlated with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Acad Radiol 2013;20(8):995-1003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obaid DR, Calvert PA, Gopalan D, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition and classification identified by coronary computed tomography: assessment of computed tomography-generated plaque maps compared with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and histology. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6(5):655-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dores H, de Araújo Gonçalves P, Carvalho MS, et al. Non-obstructive coronary artery disease documented by cardiac computed tomography: discrepancy between atherosclerotic burden and cardiovascular risk. Rev Port Cardiol 2013;32(7-8):613-18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otaki Y, Berman DS, Min JK. Prognostic utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography. Indian Heart J 2013;65(3):300-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin WH, Lu B, Hou ZH, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with sub-milliSievert radiation dose by prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral CT angiography and iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2013;23(11):2927-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leem J, Hee Koh E, Jeong E, et al. Prevalence of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes according to the coronary calcium score. Intern Med 2012;51(21):3017-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu KH, de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, et al. Prognostic value of renal dysfunction for the prediction of outcome versus results of computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2011;108(7):968-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bie MK, Buiten MS, Gaasbeek A, et al. CT Coronary angiography is feasible for the assessment of coronary artery disease in chronic dialysis patients, despite high average calcium Scores. PLoS One 2013;8(7):e67936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpouzas GA, Malpeso J, Choi TY, et al. Prevalence, extent and composition of coronary plaque in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without symptoms or prior diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voros S, Rivera JJ, Berman DS, et al. Guideline for minimizing radiation exposure during acquisition of coronary artery calcium scans with the use of multidetector computed tomography a report by the society for atherosclerosis imaging and prevention tomographic imaging and prevention councils in collaboration with the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(2):75-83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al.T angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366(15):1393-403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takakuwa KM, Keith SW, Estepa AT, Shofer FS. A meta-analysis of 64-section coronary CT angiography findings for predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Acad Radiol 2011;18(12):1522-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka K, Fukuda S, Tanaka A, et al. Napkin-ring sign on coronary CT angiography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6(4):448-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula J, Garg P, Achenbach S, et al. Arithmetic of vulnerable plaques for noninvasive imaging. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008;5(Suppl 2):S2-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rathod A. Coronary computed tomographic angiography: from anatomical to functional assessment of coronary artery disease. Minerva Cardioangiol 2013;61(1):53-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar