The Ross procedure: suitable for everyone?

References

• Une D, Ruel M, David TE. Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: is it durable enough? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McClure RS, McGurk S, Cevasco M, et al. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouhout I, Stevens LM, Mazine A, et al. Long-term outcomes after elective isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement in young adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Celiento M, Filaferro L, Milano AD, et al. Single center experience with the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis: a 17-year clinical follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard D, Mazine A, Stevens LM, et al. Twenty-year experience with the carbomedics mechanical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;97(3):816-23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sansone F, Dato GM, Zingarelli E, et al. Long-term follow-up of stentless prosthesis. J Cardiol 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan V, Kulik A, Tran A, et al. Long-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Hancock II versus the Perimount aortic bioprostheses. Circulation 2010;122(Suppl 11):S10-16
   Google Scholar
• Ruel M, Chan V, Bedard P, et al. Very long-term survival implications of heart valve replacement with tissue versus mechanical prostheses in adults <60 years of age. Circulation 2007;116(Suppl 11):I294-300
   Google Scholar
• Weymann A, Dohmen PM, Grubitzsch H, et al. Clinical experience with expanded use of the Ross procedure: a paradigm shift? J Heart Valve Dis 2010;19(3):279-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weymann A, Schmack B, Okada T, et al. Reendothelialization of human heart valve neoscaffolds using umbilical cord-derived endothelial cells. Circ J 2013;77(1):207-16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honge JL, Funder J, Hansen E, et al. Recellularization of aortic valves in pigs. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39(6):829-34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massel DR, Little SH. Antiplatelet and anticoagulation for patients with prosthetic heart valves. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;7:CD003464
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halbritter K, Beyer-Westendorf J, Nowotny J, et al. Hospitalization for vitamin-K-antagonist-related bleeding: treatment patterns and outcome. J Thromb Haemost 2013;11(4):651-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbieri D, Dohmen PM, Linneweber J, et al. Early outcome after surgery for active native and prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis. J Heart Valve Dis 2008;17(5):508-24; discussion 525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maciejewski M, Piestrzeniewicz K, Bielecka-Dabrowa A, Walczak A. Biological artificial valve dysfunction - single-centre, observational echocardiographic study in patients operated on before age 65 years. Arch Med Sci 2011;7(6):993-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sievers HH, Stierle U, Charitos EI, et al. Fourteen years’ experience with 501 subcoronary Ross procedures: surgical details and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140(4):816-22. 822 e811-815
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelzer P. The Ross procedure: state of the art 2011. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;23(2):115-23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brancaccio G, Polito A, Hoxha S, et al. The Ross procedure in patients aged less than 18 years: the midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147(1):383-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohm JO, Hemmer W, Rein JG, et al. A single-institution experience with the Ross operation over 11 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87(2):514-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JW, Patel PM, Rodefeld MD, Turrentine MW. The Ross operation in adolescents. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2013;4(4):403-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidtke C, Dahmen G, Sievers HH. Subcoronary Ross procedure in patients with active endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83(1):36-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamm CW, Mollmann H, Holzhey D, et al. The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY): in-hospital outcome. Eur Heart J 2013. [Epub ahead to print]
   Google Scholar
• Andreas M, Wiedemann D, Seebacher G, et al. The Ross procedure offers excellent survival compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement in a real-world setting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014. [Epub ahead to print]
   Google Scholar
• El-Hamamsy I, Eryigit Z, Stevens LM, et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376(9740):524-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Fukui T, et al. Fate of the autograft and homograft following Ross aortic valve replacement: reoperative frequency, outcome, and management. J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15(2):253-9; discussion 259-260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charitos EI, Hanke T, Stierle U, et al. Autograft reinforcement to preserve autograft function after the Ross procedure: a report from the German-Dutch Ross registry. Circulation 2009;120(Suppl 11):S146-54
   Google Scholar
• Sievers HH, Stierle U, Charitos EI, et al. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after the Ross procedure: a report from the German-Dutch Ross Registry. Circulation 2010;122(Suppl 11):S216-23
   Google Scholar
• Charitos EI, Takkenberg JJ, Hanke T, et al. Reoperations on the pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft after the Ross procedure: an update on the German Dutch Ross Registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144(4):813-21; discussion 821-813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhles MM, Charitos EI, Stierle U, et al. The fate of pulmonary conduits after the Ross procedure: longitudinal analysis of the German-Dutch Ross registry experience. Heart 2013;99(24):1857-66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duebener LF, Stierle U, Erasmi A, et al. Ross procedure and left ventricular mass regression. Circulation 2005;112(Suppl 9):I415-22
   Google Scholar
• Ross DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 1967;2(7523):956-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross D, Jackson M, Davies J. Pulmonary autograft aortic valve replacement: long-term results. J Card Surg 1991;6(Suppl 4):529-33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kouchoukos NT, Masetti P, Nickerson NJ, et al. The Ross procedure: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78(3):773-81; discussion 773-81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelzer P, Jones DJ, Elkins RC. Aortic root replacement with pulmonary autograft. Circulation 1989;80(5 Pt 2):III209-13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skillington PD, Grigg LE. Insertion of the pulmonary autograft as an inclusion cylinder – modifications to existing techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4(4):374-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robles A, Vaughan M, Lau JK, et al. Long-term assessment of aortic valve replacement with autologous pulmonary valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39(3):238-42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Shahriari A, et al. The Ross full root replacement in adults with bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Heart Valve Dis 2011;20(3):332-9; discussion 340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berdajs D. Ross procedure for everyone. Swiss Med Wkly 2012;142:w13641
   Google Scholar
• Elkins RC, Santangelo K, Stelzer P, et al. Pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve: an evolution of technique. J Card Surg 1992;7(2):108-16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skillington PD, Mokhles MM, Takkenberg JJ, et al. Twenty-year analysis of autologous support of the pulmonary autograft in the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96(3):823-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang A, Jaggers J, Ungerleider RM, et al. Exercise echocardiographic comparison of pulmonary autograft and aortic homograft replacements for aortic valve disease in adults. J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12(2):202-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oury JH, Doty DB, Oswalt JD, et al. Cardiopulmonary response to maximal exercise in young athletes following the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66(Suppl 6):S153-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross D. Replacement of the aortic valve with a pulmonary autograft: the “switch” operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52(6):1346-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins RC, Knott-Craig CJ, Ward KE, et al. Pulmonary autograft in children: realized growth potential. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57(6):1387-93; discussion 1393-84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saravalli OA, Somerville J, Jefferson KE. Calcification of aortic homografts used for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;80(6):909-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hechadi J, Gerber BL, Coche E, et al. Stentless xenografts as an alternative to pulmonary homografts in the Ross operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44(1):e32-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, Holinski S, et al. Mid-term clinical results using a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract during the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84(3):729-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, Holinski S, et al. Ten years of clinical results with a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92(4):1308-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas RA. The Ross procedure is not the procedure of choice for the teenager requiring aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2005;176-80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luciani GB, Casali G, Favaro A, et al. Fate of the aortic root late after Ross operation. Circulation 2003;108(Suppl 1):II61-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Kerchove L, Rubay J, Pasquet A, et al. Ross operation in the adult: long-term outcomes after root replacement and inclusion techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87(1):95-102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elkins RC, Lane MM, McCue C. Pulmonary autograft reoperation: incidence and management. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62(2):450-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takkenberg JJ, Klieverik LM, Schoof PH, et al. The Ross procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2009;119(2):222-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elkins RC, Thompson DM, Lane MM, et al. Ross operation: 16-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136(3):623-30. 630 e621-625
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David TE, Woo A, Armstrong S, Maganti M. When is the Ross operation a good option to treat aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139(1):68-73; discussion 73-65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart RD, Backer CL, Hillman ND, et al. The Ross operation in children: effects of aortic annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84(4):1326-30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valeske K, Muller M, Hijjeh N, et al. The fate of the pulmonary autograft in the aortic position: experience and results of 98 patients in twelve years. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;58(6):334-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams IA, Quaegebeur JM, Hsu DT, et al. Ross procedure in infants and toddlers followed into childhood. Circulation 2005;112(Suppl 9):I390-5
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto T, Matsumura G, Kosaka Y, et al. Long-term results of Konno procedure for complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34(1):37-41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piccardo A, Ghez O, Gariboldi V, et al. Ross and Ross-Konno procedures in infants, children and adolescents: a 13-year experience. J Heart Valve Dis 2009;18(1):76-82; discussion 83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Shahriari AP, et al. Modification of the Ross aortic valve replacement to prevent late autograft dilatation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37(5):1002-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JW, Fehrenbacher JW, Ruzmetov M, et al. Ross root dilation in adult patients: is preoperative aortic insufficiency associated with increased late autograft reoperation? Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92(1):74-81. Discussion 81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pacifico AD, Kirklin JK, McGiffin DC, et al. The Ross operation--early echocardiographic comparison of different operative techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3(4):365-70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ungerleider RM, Ootaki Y, Shen I, Welke KF. Modified Ross procedure to prevent autograft dilatation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90(3):1035-7; discussion 1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar AC, Lick SD, Palacio DM, Johnson RF Jr. Ross procedure with a composite autograft using stretch Gore-Tex material. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88(4):e34-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juthier F, Banfi C, Vincentelli A, et al. Modified Ross operation with reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft: six-year results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139(6):1420-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David TE, Omran A, Webb G, et al. Geometric mismatch of the aortic and pulmonary roots causes aortic insufficiency after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112(5):1231-7; discussion 1237-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, et al. Aortic and pulmonary root: are their dynamics similar? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21(2):268-75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bekkers JA, Klieverik LM, Raap GB, et al. Aortic root reoperations after pulmonary autograft implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140(Suppl 6):S58-63; discussion S86-91
   Google Scholar
• Luciani GB, Viscardi F, Pilati M, et al. The Ross-Yacoub procedure for aneurysmal autograft roots: a strategy to preserve autologous pulmonary valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139(3):536-42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Kerchove L, Boodhwani M, Etienne PY, et al. Preservation of the pulmonary autograft after failure of the Ross procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38(3):326-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillespie MJ, Rome JJ, Levi DS, et al. Melody valve implant within failed bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonary position: a multicenter experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5(6):862-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar