Cardiac magnetic resonance for prognostic assessment: present applications and future directions

References

• Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M, et al. European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry--multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardio 2010;55:2614-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandy SJ, Waugh SA, Nicholas RS, et al. Comparison of the reproducibility of quantitative cardiac left ventricular assessments in healthy volunteers using different MRI scanners: a multicenter simulation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:359-65
   Google Scholar
• Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:29-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, et al. Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2004;147:218-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maron MS, Rowin EJ, Lin D, et al. Prevalence and clinical profile of myocardial crypts in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:441-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint N, Stoeck CT, Schaeffter T, et al. In vivo human cardiac fibre architecture estimation using shape-based diffusion tensor processing. Med Image Anal 2013;17:1243-55
   Google Scholar
• McGill LA, Ismail TF, Nielles-Vallespin S, et al. Reproducibility of in-vivo diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:86
   Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, et al. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1461-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H, Kappl MJ, Conradi S, et al. Reproducibility of chronic and acute infarct size measurement by delayed enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1641-5
   Google Scholar
• Kwong RY, Chan AK, Brown KA, et al. Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2006;113:2733-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingkanisorn WP, Rhoads KL, Aletras AH, et al. Gadolinium delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with clinical measures of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2253-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2004;343:1445-53
   Google Scholar
• Mather AN, Lockie T, Nagel E, et al. Appearance of microvascular obstruction on high resolution first-pass perfusion, early and late gadolinium enhancement CMR in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:33
   Google Scholar
• Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:765-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waha S, Desch S, Eitel I, et al. Impact of early vs. late microvascular obstruction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging on long-term outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with traditional prognostic markers. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2660-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadamitzky M, Langhans B, Hausleiter J, et al. Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-Sestamibi. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:216-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Kubusch K, Strohm O, et al. Prognostic value and determinants of a hypointense infarct core in T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance in acute reperfused ST-elevation-myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:354-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Green JD, Sykes JM, et al. Detection and quantification of myocardial reperfusion hemorrhage using T2*-weighted CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:1274-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellnhofer E, Olariu A, Klein C, et al. Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to SCAR quantification for the prediction of functional recovery. Circulation 2004;109:2172-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle S, Roes SD, Klein C, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial infarct size and contractile reserve using magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1770-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham SE, Hachamovitch R. Incremental prognostic significance of combined cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, adenosine stress perfusion, delayed enhancement, and left ventricular function over preimaging information for the prediction of adverse events. Circulation 2011;123:1509-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle S, Nagel E, Voss A, et al. A bi-center cardiovascular magnetic resonance prognosis study focusing on dobutamine wall motion and late gadolinium enhancement in 3,138 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2310-12
   Google Scholar
• Neilan TG, Coelho-Filho OR, Danik SB, et al. CMR quantification of myocardial scar provides additive prognostic information in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:944-54
   Google Scholar
• Bruder O, Wagner A, Jensen CJ, et al. Myocardial scar visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts major adverse events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:875-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grun S, Schumm J, Greulich S, et al. Long-term follow-up of biopsy-proven viral myocarditis: predictors of mortality and incomplete recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1604-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm J, Greulich S, Wagner A, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance risk stratification in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall'Armellina E, et al. T(1) mapping for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis using CMR: comparison to T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhanced imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:1048-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thavendiranathan P, Walls M, Giri S, et al. Improved detection of myocardial involvement in acute inflammatory cardiomyopathies using T2 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:102-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2009;119:1758-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA 2014;311:498-506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daccarett M, Badger TJ, Akoum N, et al. Association of left atrial fibrosis detected by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:831-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadidi AS, Cochet H, Shah AJ, et al. Inverse relationship between fractionated electrograms and atrial fibrosis in persistent atrial fibrillation: combined magnetic resonance imaging and high-density mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:802-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012;379:453-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS, et al. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1427-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115:1769-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho-Filho OR, Seabra LF, Mongeon FP, et al. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:850-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah R, Heydari B, Coelho-Filho O, et al. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provides effective cardiac risk reclassification in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease. Circulation 2013;128:605-14
   Google Scholar
• Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2012;126:e354-471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle S, Chiribiri A, Vierecke J, et al. Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress. CMR, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:161-72
   Google Scholar
• Korosoglou G, Gitsioudis G, Voss A, et al. Strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance during high-dose dobutamine stress testing for the estimation of cardiac outcomes: comparison to clinical parameters and conventional wall motion readings. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1140-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipinski MJ, McVey CM, Berger JS, et al. Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:826-38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury RC, Shash K, Nagurney JT, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circulation 2008;118:837-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich MG, Abdel-Aty H, Taylor A, et al. The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1581-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masci PG, Ganame J, Strata E, et al. Myocardial salvage by CMR correlates with LV remodeling and early ST-segment resolution in acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:45-51
   Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G, et al. Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;55:2470-9
   Google Scholar
• Messroghli DR, Walters K, Plein S, et al. Myocardial T1 mapping: application to patients with acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:34-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flett AS, Hayward MP, Ashworth MT, et al. Equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the measurement of diffuse myocardial fibrosis: preliminary validation in humans. Circulation 2010;122:138-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White SK, Sado DM, Fontana M, et al. T1 mapping for myocardial extracellular volume measurement by CMR: bolus only versus primed infusion technique. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:955-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntmann VO, Voigt T, Chen Z, et al. Native T1 mapping in differentiation of normal myocardium from diffuse disease in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:475-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamitsos TD, Piechnik SK, Banypersad SM, et al. Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:488-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sado DM, White SK, Piechnik SK, et al. Identification and assessment of Anderson-Fabry disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance noncontrast myocardial T1 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:392-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntmann VO, D'Cruz D, Smith Z, et al. Native myocardial T1 mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in subclinical cardiomyopathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:295-301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong TC, Piehler K, Meier CG, et al. Association between extracellular matrix expansion quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and short-term mortality. Circulation 2012;126:1206-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Li K, Liu X, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:69-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdan A, Asbach P, Wellnhofer E, et al. A prospective study for comparison of MR and CT imaging for detection of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:50-61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:983-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt N, Ferreira N, Chiribiri A, et al. Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:730-8
   Google Scholar
• Yoon YE, Kitagawa K, Kato S, et al. Prognostic value of coronary magnetic resonance angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2316-22
   Google Scholar
• Doltra A, Hamdan A, Huppertz A, et al. Abstract 17187: head to head comparison of coronary mr and ct angiography for prediction of cardiovascular events – a long-term follow-up study. Circulation 2013;128:A17187
   Google Scholar
• Schachinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation 2000;101:1899-906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays AG, Hirsch GA, Kelle S, et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery endothelial function in healthy subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1657-65
   Google Scholar
• Kelle S, Hays AG, Hirsch GA, et al. Coronary artery distensibility assessed by 3.0 Tesla coronary magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with and without coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:491-7
   Google Scholar
• Hays AG, Kelle S, Hirsch GA, et al. Regional coronary endothelial function is closely related to local early coronary atherosclerosis in patients with mild coronary artery disease: pilot study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:341-8
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim T, Makowski MR, Jankauskas A, et al. Serial contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates regression of hyperenhancement within the coronary artery wall in patients after acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:580-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeweis C, Schnackenburg B, Stuber M, et al. Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI of the coronary artery wall in takayasu arteritis. PLoS One 2012;7:e50655
   Google Scholar
• Puntmann VO, D'Cruz D, Taylor PC, et al. Contrast enhancement imaging in coronary arteries in SLE. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:962-4
   Google Scholar
• Rijzewijk LJ, van der Meer RW, Smit JW, et al. Myocardial steatosis is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1793-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Meer RW, Rijzewijk LJ, Diamant M, et al. The ageing male heart: myocardial triglyceride content as independent predictor of diastolic function. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1516-22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn DJ, Wang F, Nishimoto M, et al. A murine model of isolated cardiac steatosis leads to cardiomyopathy. Hypertension 2011;57:216-22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meierhofer C, Schneider EP, Lyko C, et al. Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:797-804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Trauzeddel RF, Barker AJ, et al. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement-a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI. Int J Cardiol 2014;170:426-33
   Google Scholar
• Fluckiger JU, Goldberger JJ, Lee DC, et al. Left atrial flow velocity distribution and flow coherence using four-dimensional FLOW MRI: a pilot study investigating the impact of age and Pre- and Postintervention atrial fibrillation on atrial hemodynamics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:580-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchens TK, Ye Q, Eytan DF, et al. 19F MRI detection of acute allograft rejection with in vivo perfluorocarbon labeling of immune cells. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1144-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildgruber M, Bielicki I, Aichler M, et al. Assessment of myocardial infarction and post-infarction scar remodeling with an elastin-specific magnetic resonance agent. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:321-9
   Google Scholar
• Makowski MR, Henningsson M, Spuentrup E, et al. Characterization of coronary atherosclerosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2013;128:1244-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar