Catheter-based closure of paravalvular leak

References

• Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, Rihal CS. Long-term follow-up of percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2218-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble S, Jolicoeur EM, Basmadjian A, et al. Percutaneous paravalvular leak reduction: procedural and long-term clinical outcomes. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:1422-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindani A, Neville EM, Venn G, Williams BT. Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg 1991;32:503-8
   Google Scholar
• Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1152-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu A, Fraser AG, Butchart EG. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart 2003;89:1316-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carlo M, Giannini C, Fiorina C, et al. Paravalvular leak after CoreValve implantation in the Italian Registry: predictors and impact on clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:5088-9
   Google Scholar
• Detaint D, Lepage L, Himbert D, et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: implantation impact of device and annulus discongruence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:821-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1686-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Ramondo A, et al. Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2011;123:299-308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi K, Latib A, Al-Lamee R, et al. Predictors of moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation immediately after CoreValve implantation and the impact of postdilatation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:432-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012;9:15-29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarria JR, Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, et al. Reoperation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. A decade of clinical experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991;5:523-6. discussion 527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cicco G, Russo C, Moreo A, et al. Mitral valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomical observations in 135 patients from a multicentre study. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2006;30:887-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourihan M, Perry SB, Mandell VS, et al. Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1371-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2210-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, Rihal CS. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: acute and 30-day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:314-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genoni M, Franzen D, Vogt P, et al. Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with aggressive surgery? Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2000;17:14-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schewel D, Frerker C, Schewel J, et al. Clinical impact of paravalvular leaks on biomarkers and survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1275-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Casserly IP, Garcia JA, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of prosthetic mitral paravalvular leaks: are we there yet? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:81-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerakis S, Hayek SS, Douglas PS. Paravalvular aortic leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current knowledge. Circulation 2013;127:397-407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaliaros VC, Liff D, Chen EP, et al. Can balloon aortic valvuloplasty help determine appropriate transcatheter aortic valve size? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:580-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willson AB, Webb JG, Labounty TM, et al. 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1287-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nombela-Franco L, Webb JG, de Jaegere PP, et al. Timing, predictive factors, and prognostic value of cerebrovascular events in a large cohort of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circulation 2012;126:3041-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneault B, Koss E, Hahn RT, et al. Efficacy and safety of postdilatation to reduce paravalvular regurgitation during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:85-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaswamy A, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. Integration of MDCT and fluoroscopy using C-arm computed tomography to guide structural cardiac interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Bavikati VV, Babaliaros VC, Lerakis S. Utility of three-dimensional echocardiography in percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak. Echocardiography 2009;26:852-4
   Google Scholar
• Yuksel UC, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. Percutaneous closure of a postero-medial mitral paravalvular leak: the triple telescopic system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77:281-5
   Google Scholar
• Krishnaswamy A, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. Three-dimensional computed tomography in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77:860-5
   Google Scholar
• Babaliaros VC, Green JT, Lerakis S, et al. Emerging applications for transseptal left heart catheterization old techniques for new procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2116-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thourani VH, Smith CM, Guyton RA, et al. Repair of prosthetic mitral valve paravalvular leak using an off-pump transapical approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:275-8
   Google Scholar
• Jelnin V, Dudiy Y, Einhorn BN, et al. Clinical experience with percutaneous left ventricular transapical access for interventions in structural heart defects a safe access and secure exit. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:868-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaswamy A, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia S. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular leaks. In: Lasala JM, Rogers JH, editors. Interventional Procedures for Adult Structrual Heart Disease. Philadelphia, PA; Saunders: 2014;1-15
   Google Scholar
• Chenier M, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Krishnaswamy A. Multimodality imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Interv Cardiol 2013;5:335-44
   Google Scholar