Aortic counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction

References

• Claus R, Birtwell W, Albertal G, et al. Assisted circulation: the counterpulsator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961;41:447-58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mouloupoulos SD. Intra – aortic balloon counterpulsation 50 year later: initial conception and consequent ideas. Artif Organs 2011;35(9):843-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moulopoulos SD, Topaz S, Kolff WJ. Diatoli balloon pumping in the aorta: a mechanical assistamce to the failing circulation Am Heart J. 1962;63:669-75
   Google Scholar
• Sjauw DK, Engstrom A, Vis M, et al. A systematic review and meta - analysis of intraoartic pumping therapy in ST elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? Eur Heart J 2009;30:459-68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidt S, Wilner G, Mueller H, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1973;288(19):979-84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction compicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999;341:625-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeger RV, Radovanovic D, Hunziker PR, et al. Ten – year incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:618-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with St – segment elevation myocardial infarction – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asociation Task force on Practise Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial infarction). Circulation 2004;110:588-636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2501-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prondzinsky R, Lemm H, Swyter M, et al. Intra – aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med 2010;38:152-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H, Zeymar U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1287-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intra – aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomized, open – label trial. Lancet 2013;382(9905):1638-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim D, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST – Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practise Guidelins. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(4):e78-e140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST – segment elevation. The Task Force on the management of ST – segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2012;33:2569-619
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urschel CW, Eber L, Forrester J, et al. Alteration of mechanical performance of the ventricle by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Am J Cardiol 1970;25(5):546-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kern MJ. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Coron Artery Dis 1991;2:649-60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber KT, Janicki JS. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. A review of physiological principles, clinical results, and device safety. Ann Thorac Surg 1974;17(6):602-36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura Y, Ohba K, Sumida H, et al. A survival case of cardiogenic shock due to left main coronary artery myocardial infarction: successful cooperation with on-site percutaneous coronary intervention and helicopter emergency medical service. Intern Med 2012;51(14):1845-50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Tatineni S, et al. Enhanced coronary blood flow velocity during intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in critically ill patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21(2):359-68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grossman W. In: Baim DS, editor. Grossman’s cardiac catheterization, angiography, & intervention. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; London: 2006
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi M, Nohtomi Y, Yoshitani H, et al. Enhanced coronary flow velocity during intra-aortic balloon pumping assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(3):368-76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, et al. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J 2001;141(6):933-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isner M, Cohen R, Virmani R, et al. Complications of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation device: clinical and morphologic observations in 45 necropsy patients. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:280
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Ferguson J, Freedman R, et al. Comparison of outcomes after 8 versus 9,5 French size intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation catheters based on 9,332 patients in the perspective Benchmark registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;56:200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, et al. Thirty – year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of management and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population – based perspective. Circulation 2009;119:1211-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm. Circulation 2003;107:2998-3002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Urban P, Christenson JT, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in US and non – US centres: results of the Benchmark Registry. Eur Heart J 2003;23:1763-70
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RD, Ohman EM, Holmes DR, et al. Use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock: observations from the GUSTO – I study. Global utilization of streptokinase and TPA for occluded coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:708-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen EW, Canto JG, Parson LS, et al. Relation between hospital intra–aortic balloon counterpulsation volume and mortality in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Circulation 2003;108:951-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vis MM, Siauw KD, van der Schaaf RJ, et al. In patients with ST – segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, admission glucose level is a strong independent predictor from1 – year mortality in patients without a prior diagnosis of diabetes. Am Heart J 2007;154:1184-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaw KD, Remmelink M, Baan J Jr, et al. Left ventricular unloading in acute ST – segment elevation myocardial infarction patients is safe and feasible and provides acute and sustained left ventruclar recovery. J AM Coll Cardiol 2008;51(10):1044-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prewitt RM, Gu S, Schicl U, Ducas J. Intra-aortic balloon counterpusation enhances coronary thrombolysis induced by intravenous administration of thrombolytic agent. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:794-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohman EM, Nanas J, Stomel RJ, et al. Thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve survival in myocardial infarction complicated by hypotension and suspected cardiogenic shock or heart failure: results of the TATICS Trial. J Thomb Thrombolysis 2005;19:33-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeymer U, Bauer T, Hamm C, et al. Use and impact of intra–aortic balloon pump on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the Euro Heart survey on PCI. EuroIntervention 2011;7:4-437-41
   Google Scholar
• Van de Verf F, Bax A, Blomstrom – Lundqvist C, ESC Committee for Practise Guidelines (CPG). Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST- segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2909-25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romeo F, Acconcia MC, Sergi D, et al. The outcome of intra–aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta–analysis. Am Heart J 2013;165:679-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar