Value of cardiac MRI to evaluate ischemia-related ventricular arrhythmia substrates

References

• Avezum A, Piegas LS, Goldberg RJ, et al. Magnitude and prognosis associated with ventricular arrhythmias in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (from the GRACE Registry). Am J Cardiol 2008;102:1577-82
   Google Scholar
• McManus DD, Aslam F, Goyal P, et al. Incidence, prognosis, and factors associated with cardiac arrest in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Registry). Coron Artery Dis 2012;23:105-12
   Google Scholar
• Ohlow MA, Geller JC, Richter S, et al. Incidence and predictors of ventricular arrhythmias after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:580-6
   Google Scholar
• Piccini JP, Berger JS, Brown DL. Early sustained ventricular arrhythmias complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2008;121:797-804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta RH, Yu J, Piccini JP, et al. Prognostic significance of postprocedural sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial). Am J Cardiol 2012;109:805-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness JR, Morrow DA, Braunwald E, et al. Myocardial ischemia and ventricular tachycardia on continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and risk of cardiovascular outcomes after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial). Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1373-81
   Google Scholar
• White JA, Fine NM, Gula L, et al. Utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in identifying substrate for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:12-20
   Google Scholar
• Bello D, Fieno DS, Kim RJ, et al. Infarct morphology identifies patients with substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1104-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu KC. Assessing risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death: is there a role for cardiac MRI? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:2-5
   Google Scholar
• Klabunde RE. Cardiovascular physiology concepts Second edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Di Diego JM, Antzelevitch C. Ischemic ventricular arrhythmias: experimental models and their clinical relevance. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1963-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby KH, Thompson T, Stebbins A, et al. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: incidence and outcomes. The GUSTO Investigators. Circulation 1998;98:2567-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpi A, Cavalli A, Santoro L, Negri E. Incidence and prognosis of early primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction – results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2) database. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:265-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp R, Gonczi M, Kovacs M, et al. Gap junctional uncoupling plays a trigger role in the antiarrhythmic effect of ischaemic preconditioning. Cardiovasc Res 2007;74:396-405
   Google Scholar
• Itoh T, Fukami K, Suzuki T, et al. Effect of pre-myocardial infarction angina pectoris on post-myocardial infarction arrhythmias after reperfusion therapy. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1157-61
   Google Scholar
• Hausenloy D, Wynne A, Duchen M, Yellon D. Transient mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening mediates preconditioning-induced protection. Circulation 2004;109:1714-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile N, Jacquier A, Shuhab A, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic value of intramyocardial hemorrhage lesions in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;79:1101-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss JN, Chen PS, Qu Z, et al. Ventricular fibrillation: how do we stop the waves from breaking? Circ Res 2000;87:1103-7
   Google Scholar
• Rubart M, Zipes DP. Mechanisms of sudden cardiac death. J Clin Invest 2005;115:2305-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner PM, Albert C, Benjamin EJ, et al. Sudden cardiac death, genes, and arrhythmogenesis: consideration of new population and mechanistic approaches from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop, Part II. Circulation 2001;103:2447-52
   Google Scholar
• Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Kaneko H, et al. Association between serum C-reactive protein elevation and left ventricular thrombus formation after first anterior myocardial infarction. Chest 2004;125:384-9
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Chen F, Xie Y, et al. Lipomatous metaplasia identified in rabbits with reperfused myocardial infarction by 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. BMC Med Imaging 2013;13:18
   Google Scholar
• Mordi I, Radjenovic A, Stanton T, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of lipomatous metaplasia in patients with prior myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Saremi F, Grizzard JD, Kim RJ. Optimizing cardiac MR imaging: practical remedies for artifacts. Radiographics 2008;28:1161-87
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista A, Flachskampf F, Lancellotti P, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for standardization of performance, digital storage and reporting of echocardiographic studies. Eur J Echocardiogr 2008;9:438-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell DH, Abbara S, Chaithiraphan V, et al. Cardiac MR imaging of nonischemic cardiomyopathies: imaging protocols and spectra of appearances. Radiology 2012;262:403-22
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Zagrosek A, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1815-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croisille P, Kim HW, Kim RJ. Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: T2-weighted imaging should not be used to delineate the area at risk in ischemic myocardial injury. Radiology 2012;265:12-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall’Armellina E, et al. Non-contrast T1-mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S, et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:269-78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia MI, Ghugre NR, Connelly KA, et al. Characterizing myocardial edema and hemorrhage using quantitative T2 and T2* mapping at multiple time intervals post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:566-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Lee VS, Chung YC, et al. Myocardial infarction: optimization of inversion times at delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2004;233:921-6
   Google Scholar
• Huber AM, Schoenberg SO, Hayes C, et al. Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR imaging in the detection of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2005;237:854-60
   Google Scholar
• Cury RC, Cattani CA, Gabure LA, et al. Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 2006;240:39-45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flett AS, Hasleton J, Cook C, et al. Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:150-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbers LF, Delewi R, Nijveldt R, et al. Myocardial infarct heterogeneity assessment by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging shows predictive value for ventricular arrhythmia development after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:1150-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong RY, Farzaneh-Far A. Measuring myocardial scar by CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:157-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maron MS. Contrast-enhanced CMR in HCM: what lies behind the bright light of LGE and why it now matters. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:597-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan AT, Shayne AJ, Brown KA, et al. Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality. Circulation 2006;114:32-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roes SD, Borleffs CJ, van der Geest RJ, et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:183-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estner HL, Zviman MM, Herzka D, et al. The critical isthmus sites of ischemic ventricular tachycardia are in zones of tissue heterogeneity, visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1942-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashikaga H, Sasano T, Dong J, et al. Magnetic resonance-based anatomical analysis of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: implications for catheter ablation. Circ Res 2007;101:939-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arevalo H, Plank G, Helm P, et al. Tachycardia in post-infarction hearts: insights from 3D image-based ventricular models. PLoS One 2013;8:e68872
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Azevedo CF, Cheng A, et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2007;115:2006-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arheden H, Saeed M, Higgins CB, et al. Reperfused rat myocardium subjected to various durations of ischemia: estimation of the distribution volume of contrast material with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2000;215:520-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuleri KH, Centola M, Evers KS, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of peri-infarct zone remodeling following myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:24
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh CH, Chia EM, Huang K, et al. Evolution of ventricular tachycardia and its electrophysiological substrate early after myocardial infarction: an ovine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:1010-17
   Google Scholar
• Solomon SD, Zelenkofske S, McMurray JJ, et al. Sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2581-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem I, Weinsaft JW, Bahnson TD, et al. Assessment of myocardial scarring improves risk stratification in patients evaluated for cardiac defibrillator implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:408-20
   Google Scholar
• Gao P, Yee R, Gula L, et al. Prediction of arrhythmic events in ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy patients referred for implantable cardiac defibrillator: evaluation of multiple scar quantification measures for late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:448-56
   Google Scholar
• Wu KC, Gerstenblith G, Guallar E, et al. Combined cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and C-reactive protein levels identify a cohort at low risk for defibrillator firings and death. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:178-86
   Google Scholar
• Kwon DH, Hachamovitch R, Adeniyi A, et al. Myocardial scar burden predicts survival benefit with implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in patients with severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy: influence of gender. Heart 2014;100:206-13
   Google Scholar
• de Haan S, Meijers TA, Knaapen P, et al. Scar size and characteristics assessed by CMR predict ventricular arrhythmias in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: comparison of previously validated models. Heart 2011;97:1951-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boye P, Abdel-Aty H, Zacharzowsky U, et al. Prediction of life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with chronic myocardial infarction by contrast-enhanced CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:871-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iles L, Pfluger H, Lefkovits L, et al. Myocardial fibrosis predicts appropriate device therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:821-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandre J, Saloux E, Dugue AE, et al. Scar extent evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement CMR: a powerful predictor of long term appropriate ICD therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott PA, Rosengarten JA, Murday DC, et al. Left ventricular scar burden specifies the potential for ventricular arrhythmogenesis: an LGE-CMR study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013;24:430-6
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo M, Ruiz-Granell R, Bonanad C, et al. Value of early cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the prediction of adverse arrhythmic cardiac events after a first noncomplicated ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:755-61
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein JC, Lee DC, Wu E, et al. A comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging peri-infarct border zone quantification strategies for the prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility. Cardiol J 2013;20:68-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott PA, Morgan JM, Carroll N, et al. The extent of left ventricular scar quantified by late gadolinium enhancement MRI is associated with spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:324-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Armenta J, Berruezo A, Mont L, et al. Use of myocardial scar characterization to predict ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace 2012;14:1578-86
   Google Scholar
• Mather AN, Fairbairn TA, Ball SG, et al. Reperfusion haemorrhage as determined by cardiovascular MRI is a predictor of adverse left ventricular remodelling and markers of late arrhythmic risk. Heart 2011;97:453-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DK, Hawlisch K, Prescott G, et al. Prognostic role of CMR in patients presenting with ventricular arrhythmias. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:335-44
   Google Scholar
• Scott PA, Rosengarten JA, Shahed A, et al. The relationship between left ventricular scar and ventricular repolarization in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Europace 2013;15:899-906
   Google Scholar
• Yalin K, Golcuk E, Buyukbayrak H, et al. Infarct characteristics by CMR identifies substrate for monomorphic VT in post-MI patients with relatively preserved systolic function and ns-VT. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014;37:447-53
   Google Scholar