Rebirth of left radial artery access: could this be the ‘right’ radial artery?

References

• Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, et al. Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998 to 2007. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:317-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamon M, Baron JC, Viader F. Periprocedural stroke and cardiac catheterization. Circulation 2008;118:678-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:930-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlow MA, Secknus MA, von Korn H, et al. Incidence and outcome of femoral vascular complications among 18,165 patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. Int J Cardiol 2009;135:66-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandak JS, Blankenship JC, Gardner LH, et al. Modifiable risk factors for vascular access site complications in the IMPACT II Trial of angioplasty with versus without eptifibatide. Integrilin to Minimize Platelet Aggregation and Coronary Thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1518-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SV, Eikelboom JA, Granger CB, et al. Bleeding and blood transfusion issues in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1193-204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevik C, Izgi C, Nugent K. Radial artery access as an emerging factor for decreasing mortality in cardiovascular interventions. J Interv Cardiol 2010;23:95-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS, et al. The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EuroIntervention 2012;8:501-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, et al. Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2012;27:84-92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:379-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:1022-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2490-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibebuogu UN, Cercek B, Makkar R, et al. Comparison between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:1262-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoroso G, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F. Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2007;8:230-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin AP, House JA, Safley DM, et al. Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:827-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Corvoisier P, Gellen B, Lesault PF, et al. Ambulatory transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a safe, effective, and cost-saving strategy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013;81:15-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinfret S, Kennedy WA, Lachaine J, et al. Economic impact of same-day home discharge after uncomplicated transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and bolus-only abciximab regimen. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:1011-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation 2013;127:2295-306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashore TM. Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Am Heart J 2004;147:375-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidovich MI, Khan AA, Xie H, et al. Radiation safety and vascular access: attitudes among cardiologists worldwide. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2015;16(2):109-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah B, Bangalore S, Feit F, et al. Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches when performed by experienced operators. Am Heart J 2013;165:286-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:258-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radner S. Thoracal aortography by catheterization from the radial artery; preliminary report of a new technique. Acta Radiol 1948;29:178-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman HA, Scott RW, Becker NO. Catheterization of the left side of the heart in man. Circulation 1950;1:357-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohrich RJ. Left-handedness in plastic surgery: asset or liability? Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:845-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson NJ, Stephens CD, Gale D. Left-handedness in dental undergraduates and orthodontic specialists. Br Dent J 1996;181:285-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavka SJ. Left-handedness in plastic surgery: asset or liability? Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominici M, Diletti R, Milici C, et al. Left radial versus right radial approach for coronary artery catheterization: a prospective comparison. J Interv Cardiol 2012;25:203-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Bodi V, et al. Right versus left radial artery access for coronary procedures: an international collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis including 5 randomized trials and 3210 patients. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:621-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, et al. Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:870-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama N, Takeshita S, Ochiai M, et al. Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:357-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart 2009;95:410-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima O, Endoh N, Terashima M, et al. Effectiveness of right or left radial approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:333-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen P, Shah S, Waxman S, et al. Comparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:38-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg SL, Renslo R, Sinow R, et al. Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;44:147-52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, et al. Evaluation of the “learning curve” for left and right radial approach during percutaneous coronary procedures. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:185-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freixa X, Trilla M, Feldman M, et al. Right versus left transradial approach for coronary catheterization in octogenarian patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:267-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelliccia F, Trani C, Biondi-Zoccai GG, et al. Comparison of the feasibility and effectiveness of transradial coronary angiography via right versus left radial artery approaches (from the PREVAIL Study). Am J Cardiol 2012;110:771-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalambous MA, Constantinides SS, Talias MA, et al. Repeated transradial catheterization: feasibility, efficacy, and safety. Tex Heart Inst J 2014;41:575-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2481-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsecchi O, Vassileva A. Radial artery: how many times? Indian Heart J 2010;62:226-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michael TT, Alomar M, Papayannis A, et al. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:1138-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanmartin M, Cuevas D, Moxica J, et al. Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:580-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziakas A, Klinke P, Mildenberger R, et al. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2005;7:93-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bundhoo SS, Earp E, Ivanauskiene T, et al. Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay. Am Heart J 2012;164:468-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore S, Roberts E, Hakeem AR, et al. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route. J Interv Cardiol 2009;22:336-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han H, Zhou Y, Ma H, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for coronary bypass graft angiography and intervention. Angiology 2012;63:103-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He PY, Yang YJ, Qiao SB, et al. A Comparison of the Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches for the Angiography and Intervention in Patients with a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: In-hospital and 1-year Follow-up Results. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015;128:762-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominici M, Diletti R, Milici C, et al. Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study. Heart 2013;99:480-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kado H, Patel AM, Suryadevara S, et al. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:810-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim HJ, et al. Bilateral selective internal mammary artery angiography via right radial approach: clinical experience with newly designed Yumiko catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;54:19-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha KS, Kim MH. Feasibility and safety of concomitant left internal mammary arteriography at the setting of the right transradial coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;56:188-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciahbasi A, Calabro P, Sarandrea A, et al. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX). Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2014;15:209-13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell MD, Hong JA, Lee BY, et al. Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:454-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balwanz CR, Javed U, Singh GD, et al. Transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography and interventions: 1-year outcomes after initiating the transradial approach in a cardiology training program. Am Heart J 2013;165:310-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, et al. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures through the left or right radial approach: the TALENT dosimetric substudy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:226-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar