Dual-energy computed tomography for detection of coronary artery disease

References

• Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al. ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines, and the American association for thoracic surgery, preventive cardiovascular nurses association, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, and society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation. 2014;130(19):1749–1767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick TH, Cho I, Ó Hartaigh B, et al. Finding the gatekeeper to the cardiac catheterization laboratory: coronary CT angiography or stress testing? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(25):2747–2756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(3):177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Wang J, Lv X, et al. Dual-source CT versus single-source 64-section CT angiography for coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(8):861–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WJ, Danad I, Raijmakers PG, et al. Effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on epicardial adipose tissue volume and coronary vasomotor function. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(1):90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology. 2008;248(2):414–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danad I, Fayad ZA, Willemink MJ, et al. New applications of cardiac computed tomography: dual-energy, spectral, and molecular CT imaging. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(6):710–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(2):256–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnoldi E, Lee YS, Ruzsics B, et al. CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5(6):421–429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersilka M, Bruder H, Krauss B, et al. Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(3):362–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NG, Butler AP. Clinical applications of spectral molecular imaging: potential and challenges. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2014;9(1):3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann S, Sauter A, Spira D, et al. Tin-filter enhanced dual-energy-CT: image quality and accuracy of CT numbers in virtual noncontrast imaging. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(5):596–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter JR, Perman WH, Kalender WA, et al. Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. II. Determination of vertebral bone mineral content. Med Phys. 1986;13(3):340–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalender WA, Perman WH, Vetter JR, et al. Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. I. Phantom studies. Med Phys. 1986;13(3):334–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So A, Hsieh J, Imai Y, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT for quantitative imaging of myocardial perfusion. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(8):829–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roessl E, Herrmann C, Kraft E, et al. A comparative study of a dual-energy-like imaging technique based on counting-integrating readout. Med Phys. 2011;38(12):6416–6428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbai M, Leichter I, Mahgerefteh S, et al. Spectral material characterization with dual-energy CT: comparison of commercial and investigative technologies in phantoms. Acta Radiol. 2014;56(8):960–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornefalk H, Danielsson M. Photon-counting spectral computed tomography using silicon strip detectors: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(7):1999–2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito M. Optimized low-kV spectrum of dual-energy CT equipped with high-kV tin filtration for electron density measurements. Med Phys. 2011;38(6):2850–2858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi A, Merkus D, Klotz E, et al. Stress myocardial perfusion: imaging with multidetector CT. Radiology. 2014;270(1):25–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonce JD, Vliegenthart R, Schoepf UJ, et al. Accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for the measurement of iodine concentration using cardiac CT protocols: validation in a phantom model. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(2):512–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So A, Hsieh J, Narayanan S, et al. Dual-energy CT and its potential use for quantitative myocardial CT perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6(5):308–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang DK, Schoepf UJ, Bastarrika G, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31(4):276–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otton J, Morton G, Schuster A, et al. A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7(2):117–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(5):1168–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(3):333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):3703–3710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45(6):306–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko BS, Cameron JD, Defrance T, et al. CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging using multidetector CT–A review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5(6):345–356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F, et al. Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(1):71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45(6):298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Yu W, Wang Y, et al. Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27(5):647–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(12):1072–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer M, Nance JW Jr., Schoepf UJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):3719–3725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(1):26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR. 2012;198(3):521–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(3):318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrascosa PM, Cury RC, Deviggiano A, et al. Comparison of myocardial perfusion evaluation with single versus dual-energy CT and effect of beam-hardening artifacts. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(5):591–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko SM, Choi JW, Hwang HK, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. AJR. 2012;198(3):512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko SM, Park JH, Hwang HK, et al. Direct comparison of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography for detection of myocardial perfusion defect. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30(Suppl 1):41–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrascosa PM, Deviggiano A, Capunay C, et al. Incremental value of myocardial perfusion over coronary angiography by spectral computed tomography in patients with intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(4):637–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinel FG, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, et al. First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT. Radiology. 2014;270(3):708–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, et al. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(7):1282–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. Circulation. 2003;108(15):1772–1778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108(14):1664–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petranovic M, Soni A, Bezzera H, et al. Assessment of nonstenotic coronary lesions by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in comparison to intravascular ultrasound: evaluation of nonculprit coronary lesions. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(1):24–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(7):1241–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohle K, Achenbach S, Macneill B, et al. Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS. Atherosclerosis. 2007;190(1):174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanami Y, Ikeda E, Jinzaki M, et al. Computed tomographic attenuation value of coronary atherosclerotic plaques with different tube voltage: an ex vivo study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(1):58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obaid DR, Calvert PA, Gopalan D, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography imaging to determine atherosclerotic plaque composition: a prospective study with tissue validation. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(3):230–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Obaid DR, Calvert PA, Gopalan D, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition and classification identified by coronary computed tomography: assessment of computed tomography-generated plaque maps compared with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and histology. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(5):655–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henzler T, Porubsky S, Kayed H, et al. Attenuation-based characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: comparison of dual source and dual energy CT with single-source CT and histopathology. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(1):54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerl JM, Bauer RW, Maurer TB, et al. Dose levels at coronary CT angiography–a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(3):530–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliburton SS, Sola S, Kuzmiak SA, et al. Effect of dual-source cardiac computed tomography on patient radiation dose in a clinical setting: comparison to single-source imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008;2(6):392–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raju R, Thompson AG, Lee K, et al. Reduced iodine load with CT coronary angiography using dual-energy imaging: a prospective randomized trial compared with standard coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(4):282–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T, et al. High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(2):117–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(11):2576–2583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(4):328–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(3):340–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart. 2010;96(12):933–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordic S, Husarik DB, Desbiolles L, et al. High-pitch coronary CT angiography with third generation dual-source CT: limits of heart rate. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30(6):1173–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsbach F, Gordic S, Desbiolles L, et al. Performance of turbo high-pitch dual-source CT for coronary CT angiography: first ex vivo and patient experience. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(8):1889–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(12):2896–2903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hell MM, Bittner D, Schuhbaeck A, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(6):418–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Layritz C, et al. Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(3):597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin WH, Lu B, Li N, et al. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(12):1239–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke J, Kowalski J. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of coronary CT angiography with consideration of unevaluable results: a systematic review and multivariate Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with intention to diagnose. Eur Radiol. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3831-z. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Yin WH, Lu B, Hou ZH, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with sub-milliSievert radiation dose by prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral CT angiography and iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(11):2927–2933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numburi UD, Schoenhagen P, Flamm SD, et al. Feasibility of dual-energy CT in the arterial phase: imaging after endovascular aortic repair. AJR. 2010;195(2):486–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz F, Nance JW Jr., Ruzsics B, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium on the basis of dual-energy coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2012;264(3):700–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Okamura T, et al. Feasibility of coronary artery calcium scoring on virtual unenhanced images derived from single-source fast kVp-switching dual-energy coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(5):391–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs TA, Stehli J, Dougoud S, et al. Coronary artery calcium quantification from contrast enhanced CT using gemstone spectral imaging and material decomposition. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30(7):1399–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontone G, Grancini L, Andreini D, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-energy computed tomography: a clinical case. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(8):835.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar