The role of multimodality imaging in the selection of patients for aortic valve repair

References

• Reference annotations
   Google Scholar
• * Of interest
   Google Scholar
• ** Of considerable interest
   Google Scholar
• Maslow A. Mitral valve repair: an echocardiographic review: part 2. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:439–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers P, Miller DC. Simple modification of “T. David-V” valve-sparing aortic root replacement to create graft pseudosinuses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1479–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansac E, Di Centa I, Sleilaty G, et al. An aortic ring to standardise aortic valve repair: preliminary results of a prospective multicentric cohort of 144 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansac E, Bouchot O, Arnaud Crozat E, et al. Standardized approach to valve repair using an expansible aortic ring versus mechanical Bentall: early outcomes of the CAVIAAR multicentric prospective cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:S37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charitos EI, Sievers HH. Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for valve-sparing surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:53–56.
   Google Scholar

* This review article describes the aortic valve and root anatomical characteristics that are important for aortic valve repair

• Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:e18–e209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1226–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103:617–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson LG. Sizing for modified David’s reimplantation procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1751–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kerchove L, Boodhwani M, Glineur D, et al. A new simple and objective method for graft sizing in valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:749–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kerchove L, Nezhad ZM, Boodhwani M, et al. How to perform valve sparing reimplantation in a tricuspid aortic valve. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Regeer MV, Versteegh MI, Klautz RJ, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography for selection of tubular graft size in David reimplantation technique. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21:459–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WC, Ko JM, Moore TR, et al. Causes of pure aortic regurgitation in patients having isolated aortic valve replacement at a single US tertiary hospital (1993 to 2005). Circulation. 2006;114:422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

** This landmark article describes the underlying pathophysiology of aortic regurgitation and sets the basis for a standardized evaluation prior to aortic valve repair

• Sarsam MA, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic valve annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:435–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frater RW. Aortic valve insufficiency due to aortic dilatation: correction by sinus rim adjustment. Circulation. 1986;74:I136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess PJ Jr, Klodell CT, Beaver TM, et al. The Florida sleeve: a new technique for aortic root remodeling with preservation of the aortic valve and sinuses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:748–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kerchove L, Boodhwani M, Glineur D, et al. Cusp prolapse repair in trileaflet aortic valves: free margin plication and free margin resuspension techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanski PP. Aortic valve insufficiency with extensive cusp pathology: repair with a pericardial patch. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:962–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson GB, Crucean AC, Savage R, et al. Toward predictable repair of regurgitant aortic valves: a systematic morphology-directed approach to bicommissural repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:40–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallenbach K, Karck M, Pak D, et al. Decade of aortic valve sparing reimplantation: are we pushing the limits too far? Circulation. 2005;112:I253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aicher D, Fries R, Rodionycheva S, et al. Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paulis R, Scaffa R, Nardella S, et al. Use of the Valsalva graft and long-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:S23–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsefi N, Zierer A, Risteski P, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve resuspension in patients with aortic valve insufficiency and aortic root aneurysm. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;18:432–437.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David TE, Feindel CM, David CM, et al. A quarter of a century of experience with aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:872–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebrich M, Kruszynski MK, Roser D, et al. The David procedure in different valve pathologies: a single-center experience in 236 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badiu CC, Deutsch MA, Sideris C, et al. Aortic root replacement: comparison of clinical outcome between different surgical techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:685–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenhoff FS, Langhammer B, Wustmann K, et al. Decision-making in aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: bleeding, thromboembolism and risk of reintervention after valve-sparing or mechanical aortic root replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu553. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Leyh RG, Fischer S, Kallenbach K, et al. High failure rate after valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the “remodeling technique” in acute type A aortic dissection. Circulation. 2002;106:I229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kerchove L, Boodhwani M, Glineur D, et al. Effects of preoperative aortic insufficiency on outcome after aortic valve-sparing surgery. Circulation. 2009;120:S120–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aicher D, Schneider U, Schmied W, et al. Early results with annular support in reconstruction of the bicuspid aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:S30–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mve Mvondo C, Nardi P, Bassano C, et al. Surgical treatment of aortic valve regurgitation secondary to ascending aorta aneurysm: is adjunctive subcommissural annuloplasty necessary? Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14:611–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

* Consensus document on the quantification of aortic regurgitation

• Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 1: aortic and pulmonary regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:223–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detaint D, Messika-Zeitoun D, Maalouf J, et al. Quantitative echocardiographic determinants of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a prospective study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewe SH, Delgado V, van der Geest R, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of aortic regurgitation and validation by three-dimensional three-directional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:560–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Hsiung MC, Miller AP, et al. Assessment of aortic regurgitation by live three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of vena contracta area: usefulness and validation. Echocardiography. 2005;22:775–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez de Isla L, Zamorano J, Fernandez-Golfin C, et al. 3D color-Doppler echocardiography and chronic aortic regurgitation: a novel approach for severity assessment. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:640–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirat B, Little SH, Igo SR, et al. Direct measurement of proximal isovelocity surface area by real-time three-dimensional color Doppler for quantitation of aortic regurgitant volume: an in vitro validation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:306–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

* This article describes the use of 3-dimensional echocardiography in the quantification of aortic regurgitation using the proximal isovelocity surface area method

• Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–2496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myerson SG, d’Arcy J, Mohiaddin R, et al. Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: association with clinical outcome. Circulation. 2012;126:1452–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Müller S, et al. 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:W1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Tang L, Zhou L, et al. Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:591–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen GI, Duffy CI, Klein AL, et al. Color Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic determination of the mechanism of aortic regurgitation with surgical correlation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9:508–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Goffinet C, et al. Functional anatomy of aortic regurgitation: accuracy, prediction of surgical repairability, and outcome implications of transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 2007;116:I264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

* This article describes the accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography in determining aortic regurgitation mechanism and aortic valve reparability in comparison to surgical inspection

• Regeer MV, Kamperidis V, Versteegh MI, et al. Aortic valve and aortic root features in CT angiography in patients considered for aortic valve repair. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:299–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, et al. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart. 2008;94:1634–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinola-Zavaleta N, Muñoz-Castellanos L, Attié F, et al. Anatomic three-dimensional echocardiographic correlation of bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Trindade PT, et al. Cardiac CT for the differentiation of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves: comparison with echocardiography and surgery. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:900–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt BA, Turin A, Markl M, et al. Association between leaflet fusion pattern and thoracic aorta morphology in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:294–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aicher D, Langer F, Kissinger A, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: a reasonable option? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:662–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfers HJ, Langer F, Aicher D, et al. Remodeling of the aortic root and reconstruction of the bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:542–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash PJ, Vitvitsky E, Li J, et al. Feasibility of valve repair for regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves–an echocardiographic study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1473–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aicher D, Kunihara T, Abou Issa O, et al. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2011;123:178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

* This article describes the factors associated with aortic valve reparability in bicuspid aortic valves

• Kunihara T, Aicher D, Rodionycheva S, et al. Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1389–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart HM, Zehr KJ, Schaff HV, et al. Valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction: a comparison of techniques. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003;12:62–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:507–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calleja A, Thavendiranathan P, Ionasec RI, et al. Automated quantitative 3-dimensional modeling of the aortic valve and root by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in normals, aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis: comparison to computed tomography in normals and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang JW, Song HG, Yang DH, et al. Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:150–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39, e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris NS, Hope MD. 4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015;23:15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope MD, Sigovan M, Wrenn SJ, et al. MRI hemodynamic markers of progressive bicuspid aortic valve-related aortic disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:140–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meierhofer C, Schneider EP, Lyko C, et al. Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14:797–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toeg HD, Abessi O, Al-Atassi T, et al. Finding the ideal biomaterial for aortic valve repair with ex vivo porcine left heart simulator and finite element modeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1739–1745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SD, Xu XY, Pepper JR, et al. Biomechanical properties of the Marfan’s aortic root and ascending aorta before and after personalised external aortic root support surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2015;37:759–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

* This article reports on the application of finite element models in the evaluation of aortic valve and root surgery