Evolving imaging techniques in diagnostic strategies of pulmonary embolism

References

• Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, et al. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86(1):452–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gal G, Bounameaux H. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: running after the decreasing prevalence of cases among suspected patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(8):1244–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischner FG. Pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol. 1962;13:169–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1992;85(2):462–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasahara AA, Stein M, Simon M, et al. Pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease. N Engl J Med. 1964;270:1075–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil BJ. A diagnostic strategy using ventilation-perfusion studies in patients suspect for pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med. 1976;17(7):613–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Investigators P. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990;263(20):2753–2759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashino Y, Goto M, Noguchi Y, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scanning and helical CT in suspected pulmonary embolism: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Radiology. 2005;234(3):740–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman LM, Haramati LB. V/Q scintigraphy: alive, well and equal to the challenge of CT angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(3):499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA, et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(23):2743–2753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353(9148):190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(12):997–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruip MJ, Leclercq MG, van der Heul C, et al. Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies. a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(12):941–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righini M, Le Gal G, Aujesky D, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9621):1343–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, et al. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(3):289–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med. 2004;116(5):291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gal G, Righini M, Sanchez O, et al. A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95(6):963–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheiman RG, McArdle CR. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: use of bilateral lower extremity US as the initial examination–a prospective study. Radiology. 1999;212(1):75–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier A, Miron MJ, Desmarais S, et al. Using clinical evaluation and lung scan to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism: is it a valid option in patients with normal results of lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography? Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(4):512–516.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, et al. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique–comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 1992;185(2):381–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng J, Krishnan JA, Segal JB, et al. Accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic literature review. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004;183(6):1819–1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D, et al. Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(2):88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295(2):172–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson DR, Kovacs MJ, Dennie C, et al. Use of spiral computed tomography contrast angiography and ultrasonography to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2005;29(4):399–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(17):1760–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mos IC, Klok FA, Kroft LJ, et al. Safety of ruling out acute pulmonary embolism by normal computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with an indication for computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(9):1491–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schissler AJ, Rozenshtein A, Schluger NW, et al. National trends in emergency room diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, 2001-2010: a cross-sectional study. Respir Res. 2015;16:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the fleischner society. Radiology. 2007;245(2):315–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–2284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Reiman RE, et al. Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006;186(6):1718–1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill MK, Vijayananthan A, Kumar G, et al. Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary embolism: effect on radiation dose and image quality. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015;5(4):524–533.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrier M, Righini M, Wells PS, et al. Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(8):1716–1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(9):831–837.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22):2317–2327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson BD, Navin P, Marom EM, et al. Overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism by pulmonary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(2):271–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani M, Lau CT, Lempel JK, et al. Historical evolution of imaging techniques for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism. Radiographics: A Rev Publ Radiol Soc North Am, Inc. 2015;35(4):1245–1262.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer RW, Frellesen C, Renker M, et al. Dual energy CT pulmonary blood volume assessment in acute pulmonary embolism - correlation with D-dimer level, right heart strain and clinical outcome. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(9):1914–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(7):434–43, W142–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revel MP, Sanchez O, Couchon S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the ‘IRM-EP’ study. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(5):743–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Hu Y, Long X, et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13(9):1623–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer J, Bitzen U, Jonson B, et al. Comprehensive ventilation/perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(8):1288–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc M, Leveillee F, Turcotte E. Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of V/Q SPECT using 99mTc-technegas. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28(8):667–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajc M, Jonson B. Ventilation/perfusion SPECT for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and other diseases. Int J Mol Imaging. 2011;2011:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bajc M, Olsson B, Palmer J, et al. Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2008;264(4):379–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein PD, Freeman LM, Sostman HD, et al. SPECT in acute pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(12):1999–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan Y, Yuan L, Meeks JK, et al. The accuracy of V/Q SPECT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiologica. 2015;56(5):565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JJ, Straiton J, Staff RT. Planar and SPECT ventilation/perfusion imaging and computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, and cost and dose comparison. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(7):1392–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbus HF, Seitz JP, Larson RK, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of lung SPET in pulmonary thromboembolism: an outcome study. Nucl Med Commun. 1997;18(10):897–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux PY, Robin P, Delluc A, et al. V/Q SPECT interpretation for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: which criteria to use? J Nucl Med. 2013;54(7):1077–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajc M, Neilly JB, Miniati M, et al. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy: part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(9):1528–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux PY, Robin P, Delluc A, et al. Additional value of combining low-dose computed tomography to V/Q SPECT on a hybrid SPECT-CT camera for pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36(9):922–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(12):1987–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, et al. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(9):1501–1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P, et al. A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2009;136(6):1546–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy P-M, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(3):165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, et al. Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(5):957–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucassen W, Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, et al. Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douma RA, Mos IC, Erkens PM, et al. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(11):709–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nisio M, Squizzato A, Rutjes AW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(2):296–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, et al. VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101(5):886–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar