593
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Aortic valve replacement in middle-aged patients: Is the increased use of bioprostheses justified?

&
Pages 405-406 | Received 13 Dec 2015, Accepted 14 Jan 2016, Published online: 12 Feb 2016

References

  • Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves: Selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1034–1048. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778886.
  • Une D, Ruel M, David TE. Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: Is it durable enough? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(5):825–830. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu014.
  • Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Candolfi P, et al. Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve in aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(3):831–837. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.030.
  • Barnett SD, Ad N. Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the united states: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(6):1422–1429. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.071.
  • Dvir D, Webb J, Brecker S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: Results from the global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation. 2012;126(19):2335–2344. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.104505.
  • Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): The joint task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42(4):S1–44. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs455.
  • Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(23):e521–643. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000031.
  • Glaser N, Jackson V, Holzmann MJ, et al. Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs. Biological prostheses in patients aged 50-69 years. Eur Heart J. 2015; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv580.
  • Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: Improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(4):878–884. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.065.
  • Chiang YP, Chikwe J, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. Jama. 2014;312(13):1323–1329. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.12679.
  • McClure RS, McGurk S, Cevasco M, et al. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: A propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):1931–1939. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.042.
  • Stassano P, Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, et al. Aortic valve replacement: A prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(20):1862–1868. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.032.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.