Contact force sensing during atrial fibrillation ablation: clinical experience and effects on outcomes

References

• Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in Partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in Collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the Governing Bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:632–696.e21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2719–2747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e1–e76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:659–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangeli P, Zado ES, Hutchinson MD, et al. Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:374–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1812–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callans DJ, Gerstenfeld EP, Dixit S, et al. Efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15:1050–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemola K, Hall B, Cheung P, et al. Mechanisms of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation by segmental ostial ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1:197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava M, Di Biase L, Mohanty P, et al. Impact of type of atrial fibrillation and repeat catheter ablation on long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1403–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang F, Antz M, Ernst S, et al. Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique. Circulation. 2005;111:127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang JJ, Elafros MA, Chik WW, et al. Early recurrence of atrial arrhythmias following pulmonary vein antral isolation: Timing and frequency of early recurrences predicts long-term ablation success. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2461–2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines DE. Determinants of lesion size during radiofrequency catheter ablation: the role of electrode-tissue contact pressure and duration of energy delivery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1991;2:509–515.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Morton JB, Halloran K, et al. Effect of respiration on catheter-tissue contact force during ablation of atrial arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1041–1047.e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Biase L, Conti S, Mohanty P, et al. General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: results from a randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:368–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkassabany N, Garcia F, Tschabrunn C, et al. Anesthetic management of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation using high-frequency jet ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson MD, Garcia FC, Mandel JE, et al. Efforts to enhance catheter stability improve atrial fibrillation ablation outcome. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:347–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya A, Hindricks G, Sommer P, et al. Long-term results and the predictors of outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using steerable sheath catheter navigation after single procedure in 674 patients. Europace. 2010;12:173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piorkowski C, Eitel C, Rolf S, et al. Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective, randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah DC, et al. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1:354–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiagalingam A, D’Avila A, Foley L, et al. Importance of catheter contact force during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model using a force-sensing catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:806–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah DC, Lambert H, Nakagawa H, et al. Area under the real-time contact force curve (force-time integral) predicts radiofrequency lesion size in an in vitro contractile model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:1038–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174–1180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichlin T, Knecht S, Lane C, et al. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:194–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Haqqani HM, Chan M, et al. Predictive value of impedance changes for real-time contact force measurements during catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:962–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Chan M, Lee J, et al. Catheter-tissue contact force determines atrial electrogram characteristics before and lesion efficacy after antral pulmonary vein isolation in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa H, Kautzner J, Natale A, et al. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:746–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmayer KS, Gerstenfeld EP. Contact force-sensing catheters. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2015;30:74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squara F, Latcu DG, Massaad Y, et al. Contact force and force-time integral in atrial radiofrequency ablation predict transmurality of lesions. Europace. 2014;16:660–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson MD, Phreaner N, Schuller JL, et al. Effect of catheter movement and contact during application of radiofrequency energy on ablation lesion characteristics. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013;38:123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohns C, Karim R, Harrison J, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the relationship between contact force and left atrial scar formation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:138–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreu D, Gomez-Pulido F, Calvo M, et al. Contact force threshold for permanent lesion formation in atrial fibrillation ablation: a cardiac magnetic resonance-based study to detect ablation gaps. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SE, Harrison J, Chubb H, et al. The effect of contact force in atrial radiofrequency ablationelectroanatomical, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and histological assessment in a chronic porcine model. JACCCEP. 2015;1:421–431.
   Google Scholar
• Haldar S, Jarman JW, Panikker S, et al. Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:1160–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluermann F, Krauss T, Biermann J, et al. In vivo contact force measurements and correlation with left atrial anatomy during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:1526–1532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makimoto H, Lin T, Rillig A, et al. In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura T, Takatsuki S, Oishi A, et al. Operator-blinded contact force monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation using conventional and steerable sheaths. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177:970–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade JG, Monir G, Pollak SJ, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using “contact force” ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation–a prospective study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1919–1924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waroux JBLP, Weerasooriya R, Anvardeen K, et al, Low contact force and force-time integral predict early recovery and dormant conduction revealed by adenosine after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2015;17:877–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotomi Y, Kikkawa T, Inoue K, et al. Regional difference of optimal contact force to prevent acute pulmonary vein reconnection during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:941–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki N, Okumura Y, Watanabe I, et al. Relations between contact force, bipolar voltage amplitude, and mapping point distance from the left atrial surfaces of 3D ultrasound- and merged 3D CT-derived images: implication for atrial fibrillation mapping and ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah W, Hunter RJ, Baker V, et al. Factors affecting catheter contact in the human left atrium and their impact on ablation efficacy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knecht S, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, et al. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43:297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bortoli A, Sun LZ, Solheim E, et al. Ablation effect indicated by impedance fall is correlated with contact force level during ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1210–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkozy A, Shah D, Saenen J, et al. Contact force in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial rhythm and ventricular contractions: co-force atrial fibrillation study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1342–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah W, Hunter RJ, Baker V, et al. Target indices for clinical ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from contact force, electrogram, and biophysical parameter analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda H, Parwani AS, Attanasio P, et al. Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. Heart Vessels. 2015. PMID:26498938. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranjan R. Is good contact enough for atrial fibrillation ablation? Jacccep. 2015;1:432–433.
   Google Scholar
• Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:647–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabile G, Solimene F, Calo L, et al. Catheter-tissue contact force values do not impact mid-term clinical outcome following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42:21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura K, Naito S, Sasaki T, et al. Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;44:235–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:327–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:1229–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, et al. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1789–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact force-sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the tacticath contact force ablation catheter study for atrial fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) study. Circulation. 2015;132:907–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal MR, Chatta J, Samanta A, et al. Use of contact force sensing technology during radiofrequency ablation reduces recurrence of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1990–1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shurrab M, Di Biase L, Briceno DF, et al. Impact of contact force technology on atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Hunter RJ, Lovell MJ, et al. Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2016;18:211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Marijon E, Fazaa S, Narayanan K, et al. Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinek M, Lemes C, Sigmund E, et al. Clinical impact of an open-irrigated radiofrequency catheter with direct force measurement on atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35:1312–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciarra L, Golia P, Natalizia A, et al. Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39:193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund E, Puererfellner H, Derndorfer M, et al. Optimizing radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation by direct catheter force measurement-a case-matched comparison in 198 patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabile G, Solimene F, Calo L, et al. Catheter-tissue contact force for pulmonary veins isolation: a pilot multicentre study on effect on procedure and fluoroscopy time. Europace. 2014;16:335–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakili R, Clauss S, Schmidt V, et al. Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103:97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf M, Saenen JB, Bories W, et al. Superior efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with online contact force measurement persists after the learning period: a prospective case control study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43:287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wutzler A, Huemer M, Parwani AS, et al. Contact force mapping during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: procedural data and one-year follow-up. Arch Med Sci. 2014;10:266–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akca F, Janse P, Theuns DA, et al. A prospective study on safety of catheter ablation procedures: contact force guided ablation could reduce the risk of cardiac perforation. Int J Cardiol. 2015;179:441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna F, Heist EK, Danik SB, et al. Assessment of catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in swine atria using force sensing technology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:218–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazeri A, Ganapathy A, Massumi A, et al. Contact-force recovery can predict cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:1129–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quallich SG, Van Heel M, Iaizzo PA. Optimal contact forces to minimize cardiac perforations before, during, and/or after radiofrequency or cryothermal ablations. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourda F, Providencia R, Marijon E, et al. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, et al. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:718–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciconte G, Velagic V, Mugnai G, et al. Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures. Europace. 2016;18:71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSimone CV, Ebrille E, Syed FF, et al. Novel balloon catheter device with pacing, ablating, electroporation, and drug-eluting capabilities for atrial fibrillation treatment–preliminary efficacy and safety studies in a canine model. Transl Res. 2014;164:508–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukkipati SR, Cuoco F, Kutinsky I, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon: a prospective, multicenter, and randomized comparison to standard radiofrequency ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1350–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contaninescu A, Lehmann HI, Packer DL, et al. Treatment planning studies in patient data with scanned carbon ion beams for catheter-free ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:335–344.
   Google Scholar