Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography

References

• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42, 1867–1878 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N. Engl. J. Med.345, 1863–1869 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshage WE, Achenbach S, Seese B et al. Coronary artery stenosis: three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent enhanced, electron-beam CT. Radiology196, 707–714 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoff DM, Ritchie CJ, Higgins CB et al. Evaluation of electron beam CT coronary angiography in healthy subjects. Am. J. Radiol.169, 93–99 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D et al. Comparison of vessel diameters in electron beam tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. Int. J. Card. Imag.14, 1–7 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Daniel WG. Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N. Engl. J. Med.339, 1964–1971 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi T, Ito K, Imazu M, Yamakido M. Evaluation of coronary artery stenoses using electron-beam CT and multiplanar reformation. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.21(1), 121–127 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Ropers D, Regenfus M, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W. Contrast enhanced electron-beam computed tomography to analyse the coronary arteries in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Heart84(5), 489–493 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmermund A, Rensing BJ, Sheedy PF, Bell MR, Rumberger JA. Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.31(7), 1547–1554 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Bachmann K. Curved multiplanar reconstructions for the evaluation of contrast-enhanced electron beam CT of the coronary arteries. Am. J. Roentgenol.170(4), 895–899 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Oudiz RJ, Zalace CP et al. Intravenous three-dimensional coronary angiography using contrast enhanced electron-beam computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol.83, 840–845 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy GP, Chernoff DM, Adams JR, Higgins CB. Coronary artery stenoses: assessment with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions. Radiology.208(1), 167–172 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Mao SS, Zhuang N et al. Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging. Invest. Radiol.36, 250–256 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao S, Oudiz RJ, Bakhsheshi H, Liu SCK, Budoff MJ. Coronary artery motion and coronary artery imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomog.24, 253–258 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Shavelle DM, Mao SS et al. Improved accuracy of noninvasive electron-beam coronary angiography. Invest. Radiol.39(2), 73–79 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Lu B, Shinbane JSet al. Methodology for improved detection of coronary stenoses with computed tomographic angiography. Am. Heart J. (2004) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rensing BJ, Bongaerts A, Van Geuns RJ et al. Intravenous coronary angiography by electron-beam computed tomography: a clinical evaluation. Circulation98, 2509–2512 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multidetector-row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology226, 145–152 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnensorge B et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur. Radiol.12, 1081–1086 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation103(21), 2535–2538 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al. Coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. Lancet357, 599–603 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. Am. J. Radiol. Am. J. Roentgenol.179(4), 911–916 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T et al. Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multidetector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology223, 212–220 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur. Heart J.23(21), 1714–1725 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol.89(8), 913–918 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart88(5), 470–474 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knez A, Becker CR, Leber A et al. Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am. J. Cardiol.88, 1191–1194 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CR, Knez A, Leber A et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomog.26(5), 750–755 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Hughes GJ, Marshall AJ, Roobottom CA. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography: experience in a UK center. Clin. Radiol.58(5), 378–383 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog C, Dogan S, Diebold T et al. Multidetector row CT versus coronary angiography: preoperative evaluation before totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Radiology229, 200–208 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology229(3), 749–756 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuettner A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43(5), 840–841 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama T, Yoshizumi T, Tamura R et al. Comparison of visibility and diagnostic capability of noninvasive coronary angiography by eight-slice multidetector-row computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. Am. J. Cardiol.93(5), 537–542 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation106(16), 2051–2054 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leta R, Carreras F, Alomar X et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16 multidetector-row spiral computed tomography: a comparative study with invasive coronary angiography. Rev. Esp. Cardiol.57(3), 217–224 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multidetector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation107(5), 664–666 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-2011;slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest. Radiol.39(4), 223–229 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur. Heart J.25(12), 1043–1048 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Shinbane JS, Oudiz RJ et al. Comparison of coronary artery calcium screening image quality between C-2011;150 and e-Speed electron-beam scanners. Acad. Radiol. (2004) (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli ML, Budoff MJ, Mao S, Shavelle DM, French WJ, Mckay CR. Detection of coronary stenosis using e-Speed electron-beam tomography. Circulation108, IV527 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Stillman AE et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and remodeling in mildly stenotic coronary segments: comparison of 16-slice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. Coron. Art. Dis.14, 459–462 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar