Trends in myocardial contrast echocardiography: parameteric versus volumetric imaging

References

• Grayburn PA, Erickson JM, Escobar J et al. Peripheral intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography using a 2% dodecafluoropentane emulsion: identification of myocardial risk area and infarct size in the canine model of ischemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.26, 1340–1347 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter TR, Xie F, Kricsfeld A, Kilzer K. Noninvasive identification of acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion with contrast ultrasound using intravenous perfluoropropane-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.26, 33–40 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Senior R, Dittrich H, Raval U, Khattar R, Lahiri A. Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation96, 785–792 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Marwick TH, Brunken R, Meland N et al. Accuracy and feasibility of contrast echocardiography for detection of perfusion defects in routine practice: comparison with wall motion and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The nycomed NC100100 investigators. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.32, 1260–1269 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper W, Hoffmann R, Kamp O et al. Assessment of myocardial reperfusion by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow reserve after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [correction of angiography] in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation101, 2368–2374 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinle SK, Noblin J, Goree-Best P et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. Circulation102, 55–60 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Swinburn JM, Lahiri A, Senior R. Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts recovery of dysynergic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.38, 19–25 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main ML, Magalski A, Chee NK et al. Full-motion pulse inversion power Doppler contrast echocardiography differentiates stunning from necrosis and predicts recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.38, 1390–1394 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronderos RE, Boskis M, Chung N et al. Correlation between myocardial perfusion abnormalities detected with intermittent imaging using intravenous perfluorocarbon microbubbles and radioisotope imaging during high-dose dipyridamole stress echo. Clin. Cardiol.25, 103–111 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcells E, Powers ER, Lepper W et al. Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41, 827–833 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masugata H, Fujita N, Kondo I et al. Assessment of right ventricular perfusion after right coronary artery occlusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41, 1823–1830 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab GS, Fung YC. Topology and dimensions of pig coronary capillary network. Am. J. Physiol.267, H319–H325 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Jayaweera AR. Coronary and myocardial blood volumes: noninvasive tools to assess the coronary microcirculation? Circulation96, 719–724 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Ito H. Microvasculature in acute myocardial ischemia. Part I: evolving concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Circulation109, 146–149 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Ito H. Microvasculature in acute myocardial ischemia. Part II: evolving concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Circulation109, 310–315 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner JR, Song J, Jayaweera AR et al. Microvascular rheology of definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.15, 396–403 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation97, 473–483 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linka AZ, Sklenar J, Wei K et al. Assessment of transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion with contrast echocardiography. Circulation98, 1912–1920 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Wei K, Ragosta M, Thorpe J et al. Noninvasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation103, 2560–2565 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins MP, Sklenar J, Le DE et al. Noninvasive prediction of ultimate infarct size at the time of acute coronary occlusion based on the extent and magnitude of collateral-derived myocardial blood flow. Circulation104, 2471–2477 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J. Clin. Invest.54, 1496–508 (1974).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N et al. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: a predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation85, 1699–1705 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K et al. Clinical implications of the ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation93, 223–228 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimoni S, Frangogiannis NG, Aggeli CJ et al. Identification of hibernating myocardium with quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with dobutamine echocardiography and thallium-201 scintigraphy. Circulation107, 538–544 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masugata H, Cotter B, Peters B et al. Assessment of coronary stenosis severity and transmural perfusion gradient by myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison of grayscale B-mode with power Doppler imaging. Circulation102, 1427–1433 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaweera AR, Wei K, Coggins M et al. Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Am. J. Physiol.277, H2363–H2374 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S et al. Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.32, 252–260 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafitte S, Masugata H, Peters B et al. Comparative value of dobutamine and adenosine stress in the detection of coronary stenosis with myocardial contrast echoacardiography. Circulation103, 2724–2730 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi Y, Ohmori K, Yukiiri K et al. Quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis by harmonic power Doppler with a simple pulsing sequence and vasodilator stress in patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41, 2060–2207 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moir S, Haluska BA, Jenkins C et al. Quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography for prediction of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow in acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol.93, 1212–1217 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senior R, Kaul S, Soman P, Lahiri A. Power Doppler harmonic imaging: a feasibility study of a new technique for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Am. Heart J.139, 245–251 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masugata H, Cotter B, Peters B et al. Assessment of coronary stenosis severity and transmural perfusion gradient by myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison of gray-scale B-mode with power Doppler imaging. Circulation102, 1427–1433 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu EHC, Skyba DM, Leong-Poi H et al. Incremental value of parametric quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by triggered low-power myocardial contrast echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43, 1807–1813 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder JA, Sklenar J. Placing faith in numbers: quantification of perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43, 1814–1816 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove D, Eckersley R, Blomley M, Harvey C. Quantification of blood flow. Eur. Radiol.11, 1338–1344 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz KQ, Bezante GP, Chen X et al. Quantitative echo contrast concentration measurement by Doppler sonography. Ultrasound Med. Biol.19, 289–297 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyba DM, Jayaweera AR, Goodman NC et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography during left atrial injection of contrast. Implications for venous injection. Circulation90, 1513–1521 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano A, Ito H, Iwakura K et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography with a new calibration method can estimate myocardial viability in patients with myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43, 1799–1806 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, We X, Chung N. Myocardial blood flow estimated by synchronous, multislice, high-speed computed tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.8, 70–77 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab GS, Lin DH, Fung YC. Morphometry of pig coronary venous system. Am. J. Physiol.267, H2100–H2113 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Klitzman B, Duling BR. Microvascular hematocrit and red cell flow in resting and contracting striated muscle. Am. J. Physiol.237, H481–H490 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarelius IH, Duling BR. Direct measurement of microvessel hematocrit, red cell flux, velocity and transit time. Am. J. Physiol.243, H1018–H1026 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manciet LH, Poole DC, McDonagh PF et al. Microvascular compression during myocardial ischemia: mechanistic basis for no-reflow phenomenon. Am. J. Physiol.266, H1541–H1550 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agati L, Funaro S, Bilotta F. Assessment of no-reflow phenomenon after acute myocardial infarction with harmonic angiography and intravenous pump infusion with Levovist: comparison with intracoronary contrast injection. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.14, 773–781 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen JP, Leong-Poi H, Klibanov AL et al. Noninvasive imaging of myocardial reperfusion injury using leukocyte-targeted contrast echocardiography. Circulation105, 1764–1767 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo I, Ohmori K, Oshita A et al. Leukocyte-targeted myocardial contrast echocardiography can assess the degree of acute allograft rejection in a rat cardiac transplantation model. Circulation109, 1056–1061 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villaneuva FS, Abraham JA, Schreiner GF et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography can be used to assess the microvascular response to vascular endothelial growth factor-121. Circulation105, 759–765 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar