Advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography

References

• Lanzer P, Botvinick EH, Schiller NB et al. Cardiac imaging using gated magnetic resonance. Radiology 150, 121–127 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman RR. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the heart: overview of the literature. Radiology 232, 653–668 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxt LM. Cardiac MR imaging: a guide for the beginner. Radiographics 19, 1009–1025 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxt LM. Primer on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: how to perform the examination. Top. Magnet. Reson. Imag. 11, 331–347 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amparo EG, Higgins CB, Farmer D, Gamsu G, McNamara M. Gated MRI of cardiac and paracardiac masses: initial experience. Am. J. Roentgenol. 143, 1151–1156 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman RR, Chien D, Kim D. Fast selective black-blood MR imaging. Radiology 181, 655–660 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, Laub G, Henry DA. ‘Black blood’ T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology 199, 49–57 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignaux OB, Augui J, Coste J et al. Comparison of single-shot fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo sequences for MR imaging of the heart: initial experience. Radiology 219, 545–550 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson DJ, Edelman RR. Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence. Radiology 178, 357–360 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattynama PM, De Roos A, Van der Wall EE,Van Voorthuisen AE. Evaluation of cardiac function with magnetic resonance imaging. Am. Heart J. 128, 595–607 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadamura E, Kudoh T, Motooka M et al. Assessment of regional and global left ventricular function by reinjection T1–201 and rest Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated SPECT: comparison with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 33, 991–997 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rerkpattanapipat P, Mazur W, Link KM, Hundley WG. Assessment of cardiac function with MR imaging. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 67–80 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Utz JA, Herfkens RJ, Heinsimer JA, Shimakawa A, Glover G, Pelc N. Valvular regurgitation: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 168, 91–94 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ, Shimakawa A, Enzmann DR. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magnet. Reson. Q7, 229–254 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Pelc NJ, Sommer FG, Li KC, Brosnan TJ, Herfkens RJ, Enzmann DR. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magnet. Reson. Q10, 125–147 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Didier D. Assessment of valve disease: qualitative and quantitative. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 115–134 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee VS, Resnick D, Bundy JM, Simonetti OP, Lee P, Weinreb JC. Cardiac function: MR evaluation in one breath hold with real-time true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 222, 835–842 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnet. Reson. Med. 42, 952–962 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. Cardiac real-time imaging using SENSE. SENSitivity Encoding scheme. Magnet. Reson. Med. 43, 177–184 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani V, Itskovich VV, Szimtenings M et al. Rapid extended coverage simultaneous multisection black-blood vessel wall MR imaging. Radiology 232, 281–288 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 174, 757–762 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman RR, Li W. Contrast-enhanced echo-planar MR imaging of myocardial perfusion: preliminary study in humans. Radiology 190, 771–777 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36, 1985–1991 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100, 1992–2002 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Wu KC, Lima JA. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 106, 1083–1089 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 218, 215–223 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo TK, Stanley DW, Castillo E et al. Myocardial viability: breath-hold 3D MR imaging of delayed hyperenhancement with variable sampling in time. Radiology 230, 845–851 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl HP, Papavasiliu TS, Beek AM, Hofman MB, Heusen NS, van Rossum AC. Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence. Radiology 230, 576–582 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U. Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Heart J. 23, 602–619 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstede JJ. Assessment of myocardial viability by MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. 13, 52–61 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstede JJ, Lipke C, Beer M et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. Am. J. Roentgenol. 174, 1737–1740 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund GK, Stork A, Saeed M et al. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging. Radiology 232, 49–57 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 1445–1453 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, Vargas JD, Parker M, Judd RM. Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function. Circulation 104, 1101–1107 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima JA, Judd RM, Bazille A, Schulman SP, Atalar E, Zerhouni EA. Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. Circulation 92, 1117–1125 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochitte CE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 98, 1006–1014 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Holly TA et al. Reproducibility of chronic infarct size measurement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106, 2322–2327 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT et al. Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 102, 506–510 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman RR, Manning WJ, Burstein D, Paulin S. Coronary arteries: breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 181, 641–643 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Schnackenburg B et al. Coronary MR angiography with steady-state free precession: individually adapted breath-hold technique versus free-breathing technique. Radiology 232, 669–676 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Kaushikkar S, Haacke EM et al. Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with retrospective respiratory gating. Radiology 201, 857–863 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danias PG, McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, Chuang ML, Edelman RR, Manning WJ. Prospective navigator correction of image position for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 203, 733–736 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 42, 1867–1878 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo E, Tandri H, Rodriguez ER et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: ex vivo and in vivo fat detection with black-blood MR imaging. Radiology 232, 38–48 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake LM, Scheinman MM, Higgins CB. MR features of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Am. J. Roentgenol. 162, 809–812 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser HW, van der Wall EE, Sivananthan MU, Plein S, Bloomer TN, de Roos A. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: a review. Radiographics 22, 639–648 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxt LM, Rozenshtein A. MR imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 163–171 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araoz PA, Eklund HE, Welch TJ, Breen JF. CT and MR imaging of primary cardiac malignancies. Radiographics 19, 1421–1434 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilkeson RC, Chiles C. MR evaluation of cardiac and pericardial malignancy. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 173–186 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glockner JF. Imaging of pericardial disease. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 149–162 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soler R, Rodriguez E, Remuinan C, Bello MJ, Diaz A. Magnetic resonance imaging of primary cardiomyopathies. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 27, 724–734 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Eggebrecht H et al. Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol. 179, 1539–1544 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundage BH, Lipton MJ. What is the role of CT scanning of the heart? Cardiovasc. Clin. 13, 91–112 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Farmer D, Boyd DP. Cardiac imaging with a high-speed Cine-CT scanner: preliminary results. Radiology 152, 579–582 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyama Y, Uji T, Hirayama T, Inada Y, Ishikawa T, Fujii M. Gated cardiac imaging using a continuously rotating CT scanner: clinical evaluation of 91 patients. Am. J. Roentgenol. 142, 865–876 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins B, Kazerooni EA. ECG-gated cardiac CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 182, 993–1010 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann MG, von Smekal A, Knez A et al. Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am. J. Cardiol. 80, 569–574 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Marshall AJ. Aortic valve imaging with computed tomography: a review. J. Heart Valve Dis. 11, 604–611 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford W, Thompson BH,Weiss RM. Coronary artery calcification: clinical significance and current methods of detection. Am. J. Roentgenol. 161, 1139–1146 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienmuller R, Groll R, Lipton MJ. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 42, 587–601 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 15, 827–832 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Kaplan G, Gasso J, Hildner F, Viamonte M Jr. Ultrafast computed tomography-detected coronary calcium reflects the angiographic extent of coronary arterial atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 74, 1272–1274 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BG, Morse J, Zhao XQ, Cheung M, Marino E, Albers JJ. Electron-beam tomography coronary calcium scores are superior to Framingham risk variables for predicting the measured proximal stenosis burden. Am. J. Cardiol. 88(Suppl.), 23–26 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 291, 210–215 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Becker C et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT. Radiology 225, 113–119 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Mao S, Zalace CP, Bakhsheshi H, Oudiz RJ. Comparison of spiral and electron beam tomography in the evaluation of coronary calcification in asymptomatic persons. Int. J. Cardiol. 77, 181–188 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford W, Thompson BH, Burns TL, Heery SD, Burr MC. Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT. Radiology 230, 397–402 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107, 917–922 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobs TF, Wintersperger BJ, Herzog P et al. Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using multislice CT with retrospective ECG gating. Eur. Radiol. 13, 1923–1930 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 217, 564–571 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmid FT, Gelman H, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ. Noninvasive coronary imaging with MDCT in comparison with invasive conventional coronary angiography: a fast-developing technology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 182, 601–608 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Roentgenol. 179, 1545–1550 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 230, 403–410 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxt LM, Lipton MJ, Kwong RY, Rybicki F, Clouse ME. Computed tomography for assessment of cardiac chambers, valves, myocardium and pericardium. Cardiol. Clin. 21, 561–585 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Mao S, Takasu J, Shavelle DM, Zhao XQ, O’Brien KD. Reproducibility of electron-beam CT measures of aortic valve calcification. Acad. Radiol. 9, 1122–1127 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M et al. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiology 225, 120–128 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartzman D, Lacomis J, Wigginton WG. Characterization of left atrium and distal pulmonary vein morphology using multidimensional computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41, 1349–1357 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dery R, Lipton MJ, Garrett JS, Abbott J, Higgins CB, Schienman MM. Cine-computed tomography of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 10, 120–123 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 232, 18–37 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenhagen P, Halliburton SS, Stillman AE et al. Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: current and future role of multidetector row CT. Radiology 232, 7–17 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 229, 749–756 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Kobza R et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography-influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility. Radiology 232, 568–577 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen JF, Sheedy PF 2nd, Schwartz RS et al. Coronary artery calcification detected with ultrafast CT as an indication of coronary artery disease. Radiology 185, 435–439 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CR, Knez A, Leber A et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 26, 750–755 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107, 664–666 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103, 2535–2538 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoi S, Mochizuki T, Miyagawa M, Shen Y, Murase K, Ikezoe J. Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies. Radiat. Med. 21, 62–67 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood AM, Hoffmann KR, Lipton MJ. Cardiac function. Quantification with magnetic resonance and computed tomography. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 32, 553–579 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A et al. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Circulation 93, 898–904 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamzik M, Schmermund A, Reed JE, Adamzik S, Behrenbeck T, Sheedy PF 2nd. Comparison of two different software systems for electron-beam CT-derived quantification of coronary calcification. Invest. Radiol. 34, 767–773 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar