Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting

References

• Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM etal. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N. Engl. J. Med.314, 1–6 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts – effects on survival over a 15-year period. N. Engl. J. Med.334, 216–219 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle BW, Loop FL, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.89, 248–258 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, Dean P et al. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts Ann. Thorac. Surg.49, 202–208 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, McBride LR et al. Fifteen-year follow-up for double internal thoracic artery grafts. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.5, 248–252 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbut DL, Traad EA, Dorman MJ et al. Seventeen-year experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann. Thorac. Surg.49, 195–201 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt SE, Jones JW, Thornby JI, Miller CC, Beall AC. Improved survival with multiple left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. Ann. Thorac. Surg.64, 9–15 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Dewar LR, Jamieson WR, Janusz MT et al. Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance. Circulation92(9 Suppl.), II8–II13 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Morris JJ, Smith LR, Glower DD et al. Clinical evaluation of single versus multiple mammary artery bypass. Circulation82(Suppl. IV), IV214–IV223 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Berreklouw E, Schonberger JP, Bavinck JH et al. Similar hospital morbidity with the use of one or two internal thoracic arteries. Ann. Thorac. Surg.57, 1564–1572 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berreklouw E, Schonberger JP, Ercan H et al. Does it make sense to use two internal thoracic arteries? Ann. Thorac. Surg.59, 1456–1463 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrel T, Horber P, Turina MI. Operation for two-vessel coronary artery disease: midterm results of bilateral ITA grafting versus unilateral ITA and saphenous vein grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.62, 1289–1294 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Loop FD et al. Does bilateral internal mammary artery grafting increase surgical risk? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.95, 850–856 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi EA, Esposito R, Harris LJ et al. Sternal wound infections and use of internal mammary artery grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.102, 342–346 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calafiore AM, Vitolla G, Iaco AL et al. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits. Ann. Thorac. Surg.67, 1637–1642 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsa M, Paz Y, Gurevitch J et al. Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts in patients with diabetes mellitus. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.121, 668–674 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uva MS, Braunberger E, Fisher M et al. Does bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting increase surgical risk in diabetic patients? Ann. Thorac. Surg.66, 2051–2055 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson MD, Borger MA, Rao V, Peniston CM, Feindel CM. Skeletonization of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts lowers the risk of sternal infection in patients with diabetes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.126, 1314–1319 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paulis R, de Notaris S, Scaffa R et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: the role of skeletonization. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.129, 536–543 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bical OM, Khoury W, Fromes Y et al. Routine use of bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts in middle-aged diabetic patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg.78, 2050–2053 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Furnary AP, Zerr KJ, Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures. Ann. Thorac. Surg.67, 352–360 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen AJ, Lockman J, Lorberboym M et al. Assessment of sternal vascularity with single photon emission computed tomography after harvesting of the internal thoracic artery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.118, 496–502 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Di Giammarco G et al. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery for isolated first myocardial revascularization in multivessel disease. Long-term clinical results in medically treated diabetic patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg.80, 888–895 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiou T, Crossman MC, Asimakopoulos G at al. Should the internal thoracic artery be skeletonized? Ann. Thorac. Surg.77, 2238–2246 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Takami Y, Ina H. Effects of skeletonization on intraoperative flow and anastomosis diameter of internal thoracic arteries in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.73, 1441–1445 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Choi JB, Lee SY. Skeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts: effects on free flow during bypass. Ann. Thorac. Surg.61, 909–913 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Wendler O, Tscholl D, Huang Q, Schäfers HJ. Free flow capacity of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts in coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.15, 247–250 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Raja SG, Dreyfus GD. Internal thoracic artery: to skeletonize or not to skeletonize? Ann. Thorac. Surg.79(5), 1805–1811 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Raja SG. Skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic arteriesadditional advantages and concerns. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.127, 1870 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mailis A, Chan J, Basinski A et al. Chest wall pain after aortocoronary bypass surgery using internal mammary artery graft a new pain syndrome? Heart Lung18, 553–558 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailis A, Umana M, Feindel CM. Anterior intercostal nerve damage after coronary artery bypass graft surgery with use of internal thoracic artery graft. Ann. Thorac. Surg.69, 1455–1458 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G et al. Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Ann. Thorac. Surg.73, 1387–1393 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion R, Glineur D, Derouck D et al. Complementary saphenous grafting: long-term follow-up. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.122, 296–304 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabik JF, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, Cosgrove DM. Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. Ann. Thorac. Surg.79, 544–551 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dietl CA, Benoit CH, Gilbert CL et al. Which is the graft of choice for the right coronary and posterior descending arteries? Comparison of the right internal mammary artery and the right gastroepiploic artery. Circulation92(Suppl. 2), 92–97 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg.64, 599–605 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Salm TJ, Chowdhary S, Okike ON, Pezzella AT, Pasque MK. Internal mammary artery grafts: the shortest route to the coronary arteries. Ann. Thorac. Surg.47, 421–427 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Vitolla G, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G et al. Composite lengthened arterial conduits: long-term angiographic results of an uncommon surgical strategy. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.122, 687–690 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Lev-Ran O, Mohr R, Uretzky G et al. Graft of choice to right coronary system in leftsided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg.75, 88–92 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Tector AJ, Amundsen S, Schmahl TM, Kress DC, Peter M. Total revascularization with T grafts. Ann. Thorac. Surg.57, 33–39 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Luciani N, Maddestra N, Di Nardo E, Angelini R. Composite arterial conduits for a wider arterial myocardial revascularization. Ann. Thorac. Surg.58, 185–190 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Gaudino M, Di Mauro M, Iacò AL, Canosa C, Vitolla G, Calafiore AM. Immediate flow reserve of Y thoracic artery grafts: an intraoperative flowmetric study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.126, 1076–1079 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Calafiore, Contini M, Vitolla G et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.120, 990–998 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.117, 855–872 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann. Thorac. Surg.78, 2005–2014 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berreklouw E, Rademakers PP, Koster JM, van Leur L, van der Wielen BJW, Wsters P. Better ischemic event-free survival after two internal thoracic artery grafts:13 years of follow up. Ann. Thorac. Surg.72, 1535–1541 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Endo M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation104, 2164–2170 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G et al. Late results of first myocardial revascularization in multiple vessel disease: single versus bilateral internal mammary artery with or without saphenous vein grafts. Eur. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.26, 542–548 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet358, 870–875 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirotani T, Kameda T, Kumamoto T, Shirota S, Yamano M. Effects of coronary artery bypass grafting using internal mammary arteries for diabetic patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.34, 532–538 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo M, Tomizawa Y, Nishida H. Bilateral versus unilateral internal mammary revascularization in patients with diabetes. Circulation108, 1343–1349 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens LM, Carrier M, Perrault LP et al. Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on mortality and event-free survival. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.127, 1408–1415 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Buxton BF, Komeda M, Fuller JA, Gordon I. Bilateral internal thoracic grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery. Risk adjusted survival. Circulation98, II1–II6 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pevni D, Uretzky G, Yosef P et al. Revascularization of the right coronary artery in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.79, 564–569 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Maiani M, Giunti G, Leacche M. Skeletonized bilateral internal mammary arteries for non-elective surgical revascularization in unstable angina. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.28(1), 120–126 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Farinas JM, Carrier M, Hebert Y et al. Comparison of long-term clinical results of double versus single internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.67, 466–470 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar