Microemboli in aortic valve replacement

References

• Markus HS, Droste DW, Kaps M et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using Doppler embolic signal detection: the Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial. Circulation111, 2233–2240 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertler M, Baeumer M, Kross R et al. Rapid decline of cerebral microemboli of arterial origin after intravenous acetylsalicylic acid. Stroke30, 66–69 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauss M, Zanette E. Detection of right-to-left shunt with ultrasound contrast agent and transcranial Doppler sonography. Cerebrovasc. Dis.10, 490–496 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serena J, Segura T, Perez-Ayuso MJ, Bassaganyas J, Molins A, Bavalos A. The need to quantify right-to-left shunt in acute ischemic stroke: a case–control study. Stroke29, 1322–1328 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalinin V, Lingaas PS, Hatteland K, Svennevig JL. Carotid Doppler microembolic signals in patients one year after heart valve surgery. Perfusion18, 333–337 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller HR, Burckhardt D, Casty M, Pfisterer ME, Buser MW. High intensity transcranial Doppler signals (hits) after prosthetic valve implantation. J. Heart Valve Dis.3, 602–606 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindner A, Georgiadis D, Luhmann A et al. Time course of high-intensity transient signals in patients undergoing elective heart valve replacement: a prospective study. J. Heart Valve Dis.6, 527–530 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgiadis D, Grosset DG, Kelman AW, Faichney A, Lees KR. Prevalence and characteristics of intracranial microemboli signals in patients with different types of prosthetic cardiac valves. Stroke25, 587–592 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grosset DG, Georgiadis D, Kelman AW et al. Detection of microemboli by transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Tex. Heart Inst. J.23, 289–292 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nötzold A, Droste DW, Hagedorn G et al. Circulating microemboli in patients after aortic valve replacement with pulmonary autografts and mechanical valve prostheses. Circulation96, 1843–1846 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nötzold A, Gerriets T, Eggers J et al. Circulating microemboli after composite replacement or valve-sparing aortic root surgery. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.50, 141–144 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgiadis D, Mallinson A, Grosset DG, Lees KR. Coagulation activity and emboli count in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves. Stroke25, 1211–1214 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaps M, Seidel G, Berg J. Is there a hemispheric side preference of cardiac valvular emboli? Ultrasound Med. Biol.21, 753–756 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringelstein EB, Droste DW, Babikian VL et al. Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD. Tnternational Consensus Group on Microembolus Detection. Stroke29, 725–729 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droste DW, Hagedorn G, Nötzold A, Siemens HJ, Sievers HH, Kaps M. Bigated transcranial Doppler for the detection of clinically silent circulating emboli in normal persons and patients with prosthetic cardiac valves. Stroke28, 588–592 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeny V, Droste DW, Hermes S et al. Automatic embolus detection by a neural network. Stroke30, 807–810 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell D, Brucher R. Online automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous cerebral microemboli with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke33, 1975–1980 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darbellay GA, Duff R, Vesin JM et al. Solid or gaseous circulation brain emboli: are they seperable by transcranial ultrasound? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.24, 860–868 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus HS, Punter M. Can transcranial Doppler discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli? Assessment of a dual-frequency transducer system. Stroke36, 1731–1734 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devuyst G, Darbellay GA, Vesin JM et al. Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gat TCD. Stroke32, 2803–2809 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braekken SK, Russell D, Brucher R, Svennevig JL. Incidence and frequency of cerebral embolic signals in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Stroke26, 1225–1230 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hiratsuka R, Fukunaga S, Tayama E et al. High-intensity transient signals due to prosthetic valve obstruction: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Ann. Thorac. Surg.77, 1615–1621 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mastroroberto P, Chello M, Bevacqua E, Cirillo F, Covino E. Duromedics original prosthesis: what do we really know about diagnosis and mechanism of leaflet escape? Can. J. Cardiol.16, 1269–1272 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rapaport SI, Rao LV. The tissue factor pathway: how it has become a ’prima ballerina’. Thromb. Hemost.74, 7–17 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambola A, Osende J, Hathcock J et al. Role of risk factors in the modulation of tissue factor actiity and blood thrombogenicity. Circulation107, 973–977 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avrahami I, Rosenfeld M, Einav S, Eichler M, Reul H. Can vortices in the flow across mechanical heart valves contribute to cavitation? Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.38, 93–97 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milo S, Rambod E, Gutfinger C, Gharib M. Mitral mechanical heart valves: in vitro studies of their closure, vortex and microbubble formation with possible medical implications. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.24, 364–370 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim WL, Chew YT, Low HT, Foo WL. Cavitation phenomena in mechanical heart valves: the role of squeeze flow velocity and contact area on cavitation initiation between two impinging rods. J. Biomech.36, 1269–1280 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hwang NH. Cavitation potential of pyrolytic carbon heart valve prostheses: a review and current status. J. Heart Valve Dis.7, 140–150 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shu MC, Gross JM, Johnson KM. Can cavitation bubbles generated by mechanical heart valves be detected by transcranial Doppler? J. Heart Valve Dis.4, 542–552 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bachmann C, Kini V, Deutsch S, Fontaine AA, Tarbell JM. Mechanisms of cavitation and the formation of stable bubbles on the Bjork-Shiley Monostrut prosthetic heart valve. J. Heart Valve Dis.11, 105–113 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin HJ, Bianccucci BA, Deutsch S, Fontaine AA, Tarbell JM. Observation and quantification of gas bubble formation on a mechanical heart valve. J. Biomech. Eng.122, 304–309 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biancucci BA, Deutsch S, Geselowitz DB, Tarbell JM. In vitro studies of gas bubble formation by mechanical heart valves. J. Heart Valve Dis.8, 186–196 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaps M, Hansen J, Weiher M, Tiffert K, Kayser I, Droste DW. Clinically silent microemboli in patients with artificial prosthetic aortic valves are predominantly gaseous and not solid. Stroke28, 322–325 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiadis D, Wenzel A, Lehmann D et al. Influence of oxygen ventilation on Doppler microemboli signals in patients with artificial heart valves. Stroke28, 2189–2194 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Droste DW, Hansberg T, Kemeny V et al. Oxygen inhalation can differentiate gaseous from nongaseous microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Stroke28, 2453–2456 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovar EA, Del Campo C, Borsari A, Webb RP, Dell JR, Weinstein PB. Postoperative management of cerebral air embolism: gas physiology for surgeons. Ann. Thorac. Surg.60, 1138–1142 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiadis D, Baumgartner RW, Karatschai R, Lindner A, Zerkowski HR. Further evidence of gaseous embolic material in patients with artificial heart valves. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.115, 808–810 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Gometza B, Duran CM. Ball valve (Smeloff-Cutter) aortic valve replacement without anticoagulation. Ann. Thorac. Surg.60, 1312–1316 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgiadis D, Kaps M, Berg J et al. Transcranial Doppler detection of microemboli in prosthetic heart valve patients: dependency upon valve type. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.10, 253–257 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kofidis T, Fischer S, Leyh R et al. Clinical relevance of intracranial high intensity transient signals in patients following prosthetic aortic valve replacement. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.21, 22–26 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bluestein D, Li YM, Krukenkamp IB. Free emboli formation in the wake of bi-leaflet mechanical heart valves and the effects of implantation techniques. J. Biomech.35, 1533–1540 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine P, Perthel M, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Hansen SB, Laas J. Downstream turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) following aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Hall or St. Jude Medical valve substitutes. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.17, 20–24 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Somod L, Hasenkam JM, Kim WY, Nygaard H, Paulsen PK. Three dimensional visualisation of velocity profiles in the normal porcine pulmonary trunk. Cardiovasc. Res.27, 291–295 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.28, 459–468 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine P, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Perthel M, Wesemeyer D, Laas J. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. J. Heart Valve Dis.9, 308–311 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laas J, Kleine P, Hasenkam M, Nygaard H. Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics. Ann. Thorac. Surg.68, 1096–1099 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleine P, Perthel M, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Hansen SB, Laas J. High-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical aortic valves. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.48, 360–363 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laas J, Kseibi S, Perthel M, Klingbeil A, El-Ayoubi L, Alken A. Impact of high intensity transient signals on the choice of mechanical aortic valve substitutes. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.23, 93–96 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Girod G, Jaussi A, Rosset C, De Werra P, Hirt F, Kappenberger L. Cavitation versus degassing: in vitro study of the microbubble phenomenon observed during echocardiography in patients with mechanical prosthetic cardiac valves. Echocardiography19, 531–536 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP et al. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke32, 2874–2881 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deklunder G, Prat A, Lecroart JL, Roussel M, Dauzat M. Can cerebrovascular microemboli induce cognitive impairment in patients with prosthetic heart valves? Eur. J. Ultrasound7, 47–51 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deklunder G, Roussel M, Lecroart JL, Prat A, Gautier C. Microemboli in cerebral circulation and alteration of cognitive abilities in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Stroke29, 1821–1826 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar