Novel cardiovascular MRI and CT methods for evaluation of ischemic heart disease

References

• Sievers B, Elliott MD, Hurwitz LM et al. Rapid detection of myocardial infarction by subsecond, free-breathing delayed contrast-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation115(2), 236–244 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloner RA, Jennings RB. Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 2. Circulation104(25), 3158–3167 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloner RA, Jennings RB. Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 1. Circulation104(24), 2981–2989 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canty JM Jr, Fallavollita JA. Hibernating myocardium. J. Nucl. Cardiol.12(1), 104–119 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation105(2), 162–167 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation100(19), 1992–2002 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stork A, Muellerleile K, Bansmann PM et al. Value of T2-weighted, first-pass and delayed enhancement, and cine CMR to differentiate between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Eur. Radiol.17(3), 610–617 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellman P, Larson AC, Hsu LY et al. Motion-corrected free-breathing delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial infarction. Magn. Reson. Med.53(1), 194–200 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagley PR, Beller GA, Watson DD, Gimple LW, Ragosta M. Improved outcome after coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and residual myocardial viability. Circulation96(3), 793–800 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax JJ, Schinkel AF, Boersma E et al. Early versus delayed revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and substantial viability: impact on outcome. Circulation108(Suppl. 1), II39–II42 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med.343(20), 1445–1453 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation113(3), 394–404 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation113(6), 823–833 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee V. Cardiovascular MR Imaging: Physical Principles to Practical Protocols. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PA, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Fleck E, Nagel E. Current clinical applications of stress wall motion analysis with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Echocardiogr.6(5), 317–326 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation110(7), 835–842 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tello R, Hartnell GG, Hill TC et al. First-pass evaluation of myocardial output during dipyridamole stress using turbo-FLASH magnetic resonance imaging. Invest. Radiol.31(11), 690–695 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Moin K, Akinboboye O, Reichek N. Myocardial first pass perfusion: steady-state free precession versus spoiled gradient echo and segmented echo planar imaging. Magn. Reson. Med.54(5), 1123–1129 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laddis T, Manning WJ, Danias PG. Cardiac MRI for assessment of myocardial perfusion: current status and future perspectives. J. Nucl. Cardiol.8(2), 207–214 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold M, Muehling O, Wilke N. MRI of myocardial perfusion. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR27(1), 2–10 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold M, Swingen C, Seethamraju RT. Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. Med. Phys.29(5), 886–897 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation97(8), 765–772 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvanayagam JB, Jerosch-Herold M, Porto I et al. Resting myocardial blood flow is impaired in hibernating myocardium: a magnetic resonance study of quantitative perfusion assessment. Circulation112(21), 3289–3296 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48(7), 1475–1497 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou D, Wolfkiel C, Brundage BH. Ultrafast computed tomography for the physiological evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Am. J. Card. Imaging8(2), 151–158 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Gunther RW, Krombach G. [Contrast-enhanced MR and MSCT for the assessment of myocardial viability]. Rofo178(8), 771–780 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48(1), 153–160 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur. Radiol.15(5), 864–871 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Cury RC, Ferencik M et al. Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol.98(3), 303–308 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A et al. Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adults. Circulation107(20), 2571–2576 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumberger JA, Kaufman L. A rosetta stone for coronary calcium risk stratification: agatston, volume, and mass scores in 11,490 individuals. Am. J. Roentgenol.181(3), 743–748 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayhs R, Zelinger A, Raggi P. High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard events. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.39(2), 225–230 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation102(1), 126–140 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA291(2), 210–215 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49(3), 378–402 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). Circulation115(3), 402–426 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Cury RC, Pena AJ. Coronary CT angiography. J. Nucl. Med.47(5), 797–806 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. Am. J. Roentgenol.179(4), 911–916 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Kuettner A et al. Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin. Imaging26(2), 106–111 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation107(5), 664–666 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart88(5), 470–474 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur. Radiol.16(7), 1409–1415 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur. Radiol.,16(12), 2739–2747 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45(1), 123–127 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45(1), 128–132 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz J, Rius T, Kuschnir P et al. The importance of end-systole for optimal reconstruction protocol of coronary angiography with 16-slice multidetector computed tomography. Invest. Radiol.40(3), 155–163 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(3), 672–677 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am. J. Roentgenol.187(1), 111–117 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(3), 552–557 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Rosales MA, Degrossi E, Durbano I, Rodriguez AE. Modified scan protocol using multislice CT coronary angiography allows high quality acquisitions in obese patients: a case report. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging23(3) 389–392 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett D, Davies G, Maseri A. Pre-existing coronary stenoses in patients with first myocardial infarction are not necessarily severe. Eur. Heart J.9(12), 1317–1323 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Weert TT, Ouhlous M, Meijering E et al. In vivo characterization and quantification of atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.26(10), 2366–2372 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferencik M, Chan RC, Achenbach S et al. Arterial wall imaging: evaluation with 16-section multidetector CT in blood vessel phantoms and ex vivo coronary arteries. Radiology240(3), 708–716 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliburton SS, Schoenhagen P, Nair A et al. Contrast enhancement of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: a high-resolution, multidetector-row computed tomography study of pressure-perfused, human ex vivo coronary arteries. Coron. Artery Dis.17(6), 553–560 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al. Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur. Radiol.15(7), 1426–1431 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferencik M, Nieman K, Achenbach S. Noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque detection by contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography: a study of interobserver agreement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(1), 207–209 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky RL, Song HK, Ferrari VA. Role of magnetic resonance and intravascular magnetic resonance in the detection of vulnerable plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(8 Suppl.), C48–C56 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(1), 147–154 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation112(15), 2318–2323 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation107(6), 917–922 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K. Basics of cardiac MDCT: techniques and contrast application. Eur. Radiol.15(Suppl. 2), B2–B9 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation113(10), 1305–1310 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG et al. Contrast agent-enhanced, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging10(5), 790–799 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Suzawa N et al. Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography. Radiology237(1), 316–321 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S, Hirano T, Makino K, Takeda K. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48(10), 1946–1950 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Barkhausen J et al. Detection of coronary stenoses with contrast enhanced, three-dimensional free breathing coronary MR angiography using the gadolinium-based intravascular contrast agent gadocoletic acid (B-22956). J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.8(3), 509–516 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar