Coronary artery bifurcation lesion classifications, interventional techniques and clinical outcome

References

• Al Suwaidi J, Berger PB, Rihal CS et al. Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35(4), 929–936 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervinka P, Stasek J, Pleskot M, Maly J. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions by stent implantation only in parent vessel and angioplasty in sidebranch: immediate and long-term outcome. J. Invasive Cardiol.14(12), 735–740 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Assali AR, Teplitsky I, Hasdai D et al. Coronary bifurcation lesions: to stent one branch or both? J. Invasive Cardiol.16(9), 447–450 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation78(2), 486–502 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation109(10), 1244–1249 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A et al. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am. Heart J.148(5), 857–864 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Choudhury A, Lee J et al. Simultaneous kissing stents (SKS) technique for treating bifurcation lesions in medium-to-large size coronary arteries. Am. J. Cardiol.94 (7), 913–917 (2004)
   Google Scholar
• Vigna C, Biondi-Zoccai G, Amico CM et al. Provisional T-drug-eluting stenting technique for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: clinical, myocardial scintigraphy and (late) coronary angiographic results. J. Invasive Cardiol.19(3), 92–97 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Jim MH, Ho HH, Chan AO, Chow WH. Stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions by using modified crush technique with double kissing balloon inflation (sleeve technique): immediate procedure result and short-term clinical outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA293(17), 2126–2130 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.49(3), 274–283 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movahed MR, Vu J, Ahsan C. Simultaneous subacute stent thrombosis of two drug-eluting stents in the left anterior descending and the circumflex coronary arteries. Case report and review of the literature. J. Invasive Cardiol.18(7), E198–E202 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Currie E, Webster MW et al. Drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: insights into the crush technique. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.63(3), 332–336 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popma JJ, Leon MB, EJ T. Strategic approaches in coronary intervention. In: Atlas of Interventional Cardiology. WB Saunders Company, PA, USA (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Spokojny AM, Sanborn TM. The bifurcation lesion. In: Strategic Approaches in Coronary Intervention. Ellis SG, Holmes DR (Eds). Williams and Wilkins, MD, USA, 288 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Safian RD. Bifurcation lesions. In: The Manual of Interventional Cardiology. Safian RD, Freed M (Eds). Physician’s Press,MI, USA, 222 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Movahed MR, Stinis CT. A new proposed simplified classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and bifurcation interventional techniques. J. Invasive Cardiol.18(5), 199–204 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev. Esp. Cardiol.59(2), 183 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melikian N, Airoldi F, Di Mario C. Coronary bifurcation stenting. Current techniques, outcome and possible future developments. Minerva Cardioangiol.52(5), 365–378 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V et al. Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: tme for a consensus! Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Baim DS, Cutlip DE, O’Shaughnessy CD et al. Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. Am. J. Cardiol.87(2), 152–156 (2001)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aliabadi D, Tilli FV, Bowers TR et al. Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting. Am. J. Cardiol.80(8), 994–997 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Dzavik V, Kharbanda R, Ivanov J et al. Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: importance of the bifurcation angle. Am. Heart J.152(4), 762–769 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Tan K, Sulke N, Taub N, Sowton E. Clinical and lesion morphologic determinants of coronary angioplasty success and complications: current experience. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.25(4), 855–865 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Melikian N, Di Mario C. Treatment of bifurcation coronary lesions: a review of current techniques and outcome. J. Interv. Cardiol.16(6), 507–513 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, Loubeyre C, Piechaud JF, Dumas P. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: a rational approach. J. Interv. Cardiol.14(6), 573–585 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D et al. Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions: immediate results and 30-day outcome.Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.60(2), 145–151 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge L, Iakovou I, Cosgrave J et al. Treatment bifurcation lesions with two stents: crush versus T stenting – one year angiographic and clinical follow-up. Heart (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Saucedo JF KE, Talley JD et al. Long term outcome of patients with true bifurcation coronary lesions undergoing new devices angioplasty. Insights from the New Approaches to coronary Intervantions Registry (abstr) Circulation (Suppl. I) (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG et al. Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent – immediate and follow-up results. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35(5), 1145–1151 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang S, Yang YJ, Xu B et al. Comparison of drug eluting stents with bare metal stents in daily practice for bifurcation lesions in Chinese patients. Chin. Med. J.119(14), 1157–1164 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Klovgaard L et al. Comparison of sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stents in coronary bifurcation lesions: subgroup analysis of the Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease Trial (SCANDSTENT). Am. Heart J.152(6), 1140–1145 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Park DW, Suh IW et al. Long-term outcome of simultaneous kissing stenting technique with sirolimus-eluting stent for large bifurcation coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.70(6), 840–846 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation114(18), 1955–1961 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge L, Airoldi F, Iakovou I et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(4), 613–620 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoye A, Iakovou I, Ge L et al. Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the ‘crush’ technique: predictors of an adverse outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(10), 1949–1958 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobeil F, Lefevre T, Guyon P et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions using the Bestent: a prospective dual-center study. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.55(4), 427–433 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Morice MC. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease. Heart90(6), 713–722 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Webster MW, El Jack S et al. Drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: Bench testing of provisional side-branch strategies. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.67(1), 49–55 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jim MH, Ho HH, Miu R, Chow WH. Modified crush technique with double kissing balloon inflation (sleeve technique): a novel technique for coronary bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.67(3), 403–409 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, Guyon P. Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the ‘culotte’ technique. Am. J. Cardiol.82(8), 943–949 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Hoye A, van Mieghem CA, Ong AT et al. Percutaneous therapy of bifurcation lesions with drug-eluting stent implantation: the Culotte technique revisited. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Intervent.7(1), 36–40 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Barlis P, Dimopoulos K et al. Culotte versus T-stenting in bifurcation lesions: immediate clinical and angiographic results and midterm clinical follow-up. Am. Heart J.154(2), 336–343 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Colombo A. Bifurcation lesions. Ital. Heart J.6(6), 475–488 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Marso SP, Lincoff AM, Ellis SG et al. Optimizing the percutaneous interventional outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus: results of the EPISTENT (Evaluation of platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor for stenting trial) diabetic substudy. Circulation100(25), 2477–2484 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervinka P, Foley DP, Sabate M et al. Coronary bifurcation stenting using dedicated bifurcation stents. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.49(1), 105–111 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Toutouzas K, Stankovic G, Takagi T et al. A new dedicated stent and delivery system for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: preliminary experience. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.58(1), 34–42 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ikeno F, Kim YH, Luna J et al. Acute and long-term outcomes of the novel side access (SLK-View) stent for bifurcation coronary lesions: a multicenter nonrandomized feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.67(2), 198–206 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lefevre T, Ormiston J, Guagliumi G et al. The Frontier stent registry: safety and feasibility of a novel dedicated stent for the treatment of bifurcation coronary artery lesions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(4), 592–598 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aziz S, Morris JL. Transradial treatment of bifurcation coronary disease using the Multi-Link Frontier bifurcation stent system. J. Invasive Cardiol.17(10), E1–E3 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ikeno F, Buchbinder M, Yeung AC. Novel stent and delivery systems for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: porcine coronary artery model. Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med.8(1), 38–42 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ormiston J, Webster M, El-Jack S, McNab D, Plaumann SS. The AST petal dedicated bifurcation stent: first-in-human experience. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.70(3), 335–340 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar