Characterization and quantitation of membrane proteomes using multidimensional MS-based proteomic technologies

References

• Venter JC, Levy S, Stockwell T, Remington K, Halpern A. Massive parallelism, randomness and genomic advances. Nature Genet. 33,219–227 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ferea TL, Brown PO. Observing the living genome. CUIT: Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 715–722 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Santoni V, Molloy M, Rabilloud T. Membrane proteins and proteomics: un amour impossible? Electrophoresis 21, 1054–1070 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Wu CC, Yates JR III, Mann M, Jensen ON. The application of mass spectrometry to membrane proteomics. Nature Biotechnol 21,262–267 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Wallin E, von Heijne G. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 7,1029–1038 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson NL, Polanski M, Pieper R et al The human plasma proteome: a nonredundant list developed by combination of four separate sources. Mol Cell Proteomics 3,311–326 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Santoni V, Kieffer S, Desclaux D, Masson F, Rabilloud T. Membrane proteomics: use of additive main effects with multiplicative interaction model to classify plasma membrane proteins according to their solubility and electrophoretic properties. Electrophoresis 21,3329–3344 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen SK, Harry JL, Sebastian L et al Unseen proteome: mining below the tip of the iceberg to find low abundance and membrane proteins. j Proteome Res. 2, 303–311 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SW, Fahy E, Zhang B et al Characterization of the human heart mitochondrial proteome. Nature Biotechnol 21,281–286 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Wu CC, MacCoss MJ. Shotgun proteomics: tools for the analysis of complex biological systems. CUIT: Opin. Mol Ther. 4,242–250 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Yu LR et al. Global and targeted phosphorylation analysis of the cortical neurone proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Yates JR. A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins. Nature Biotechnol 21,532–538 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR III. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nature Biotechnol 19,242–247 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Blonder J, Conrads TP, Yu LR et al A detergent- and cyanogen bromide-free method for integral membrane proteomics: application to Halobacterium purple membranes and the human epidermal membrane proteome. Proteomics 4, 31–45 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Blonder J et al A proteomic characterization of the plasma membrane of human epidermis by high-throughput mass spectrometry. J Invest. Dermal& (In Press)
   Google Scholar
• Yan JX, Devenish AT, Wait R, Stone T, Lewis S, Fowler S. Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis of Ercherichia coil. Proteomics 2, 1682–1698 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Molloy MP, Phadke ND, Maddock JR, Andrews PC. Two-dimensional electrophoresis and peptide mass fingerprinting of bacterial outer membrane proteins. Electrophoresis 22,1686–1696 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Han DK, Eng J, Zhou H, Aebersold R. Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nature Biotechnol. 19,946–951 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature Biotechnol. 17,994–999 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Hansen KC, Schmitt-Ulms G, Chalkley RJ, Hirsch J, Baldwin MA, Burlingame AL. Mass spectrometric analysis of protein mixtures at low levels using cleavable 13C-isotope-coded affinity tag and multidimensional chromatography. Mo1 Cell. Proteomics2, 299–314 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Seibenhener ML, Wooten MW Heterogeneity of protein kinase C isoform expression in chemically induced HL60 cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 207,183–188 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Wooten MW, Seibenhener ML, Soh Y. Expression of protein kinase C isoforms in HL60 and phorbol ester resistant HL525 cells. Cytobios. 76,19–29 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kiss Z, Deli E, Kuo JF. Temporal changes in intracellular distribution of protein kinase C during differentiation of human leukemia HL60 cells induced by phorbol ester. FEBS Lett. 231,41–46 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Foster LJ, de Hoag CL, Mann M. Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100,5813–5818 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Simons K, Ikonen E. How cells handle cholesterol. Science 290,1721–1726 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Schnolzer M, Jedrzejewski P, Lehmann WD. Protease-catalyzed incorporation of 180 into peptide fragments and its application for protein sequencing by electrospray and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 17, 945–953 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko A, Chernushevich I, Ens W, Standing KG, Thomson B, Wilm M. Rapid de novo peptide sequencing by a combination of nanoelectrospray, isotopic labeling and a quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 11,1015-1024 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J, Demirev PA, Fenselau C. Proteolytic 180 labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem. 73,2836–2842 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds KJ, Yao X, Fenselau C. Proteolytic 180 labeling for comparative proteomics: evaluation of endoprotease Glu-C as the catalytic agent. I Proteome Res. 1,27–33 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Stewart II, Thomson T, Figeys D.180 labeling: a tool for proteomics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15,2456–2465 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Blonder J, Hale ML, Lucas DA et al. Proteomic analysis of detergent resistant membrane rafts. Electrophoresis 25(9) 1307–1318 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Blonder J et al. Proteolytic 180 labeling for comparative membrane proteomics: application to quantitative profiling of Vero cells. (Submitted)
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins AL, Groom CR. Opinion: the druggable genome. Nature Rev Drug Discov 1,727–730 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bethge WA, Sandmaier BM. Targeted cancer therapy and immunosuppression using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. Semin. Oncol. 31,68–82 (2004).
   Google Scholar