Proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

References

• Pennington SR, Wilkins MR, Hochstrasser DF, Dunn MJ. Proteome analysis: from protein characterization to biological function. Trends Cell. Biol.7(4), 168–173 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rochon Y, Franza BR, Aebersold R. Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol.19(3), 1720–1730 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futcher B, Latter GI, Monardo P, McLaughlin CS, Garrels JI. A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Biol.19(11), 7357–7368 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol.17(10), 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen JS, Wilkinson CJ, Mayor T et al. Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling. Nature426(6966), 570–574 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem.76(14), 4193–4201 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krijgsveld J, Ketting RF, Mahmoudi T et al. Metabolic labeling of C. elegans and D. melanogaster for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.21(8), 927–931 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong S-E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics1(5), 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose K, Simona MG, Offord RE et al. A new mass-spectrometric C-terminal sequencing technique finds a similarity between γ-interferon and α2-interferon and identifies a proteolytically clipped γ-interferon that retains full antiviral activity. Biochem. J.215(2), 273–277 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell Proteomics3(12), 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Kellermann J, Lottspeich F. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels. Proteomics5(1), 4–15 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisle B, Schmidt A, Scheibe B et al. Quantitative profiling of the membrane proteome in a halophilic archaeon. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(9), 1543–1558 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Stemmann O, Zou H, Gerber SA, Gygi SP, Kirschner MW. Dual inhibition of sister chromatid separation at metaphase. Cell107(6), 715–726 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(12), 6940–6945 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Beynon RJ, Doherty MK, Pratt JM, Gaskell SJ. Multiplexed absolute quantification in proteomics using artificial QCAT proteins of concatenated signature peptides. Nat. Methods2(8), 587–589 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers J, Simpson DM, Robertson DH, Gaskell SJ, Beynon RJ. Absolute multiplexed quantitative analysis of protein expression during muscle development using QconCAT. Mol. Cell. Proteomics (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Yan W, Chen SS. Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomic profiling. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic.4(1), 27–38 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao J, Opiteck GJ, Friedrichs MS, Dongre AR, Hefta SA. Changes in the protein expression of yeast as a function of carbon source. J. Proteome Res.2(6), 643–649 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang JX, Ginanni N, Dongre AR, Hefta SA, Opiteck GJ. Biomarker discovery in urine by proteomics. J. Proteome Res.1(2), 161–169 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Klemic JF, Chang S et al. Analysis of yeast protein kinases using protein chips. Nat. Genet.26(3), 283–289 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science293(5537), 2101–2105 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin A-C, Bösche M, Krause R et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature415(6868), 141–147 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature403(6770), 623–627 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kuruvilla FG, Shamji AF, Sternson SM, Hergenrother PJ, Schreiber SL. Dissecting glucose signalling with diversity-oriented synthesis and small-molecule microarrays. Nature416(6881), 653–657 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck SC. Update on proteomics in Arabidopsis. Where do we go from here? Plant Physiol.138(2), 591–599 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreil DP, Karp NA, Lilley KS. DNA microarray normalization methods can remove bias from differential protein expression analysis of 2D difference gel electrophoresis results. Bioinformatics20(13), 2026–2034 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alban A, David SO, Bjorkesten L et al. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics3(1), 36–44 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol.19(3), 242–247 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieske LR. A perspective on the use of iTRAQ™ reagent technology for protein complex and profiling studies. J. Exp. Bot.57(7), 1501–1508 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham TK, Chong PK, Gan CS, Wright PC. Proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under high gravity fermentation conditions. J. Proteome Res.5(12), 3411–3419 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Chong PK, Gan CS, Pham TK, Wright PC. Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) reproducibility: implication of multiple injections. J. Proteome Res.5(5), 1232–1240 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan CS, Chong PK, Pham TK, Wright PC. Technical, experimental, and biological variations in isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). J. Proteome Res.6(2), 821–827 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Perrot M, Sagliocco F, Mini T et al. Two-dimensional gel protein database of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Electrophoresis20(11), 2280–2298 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko A, Jensen ON, Podtelejnikov AV et al. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA93(25), 14440–14445 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillet I, Lagniel G, Perrot M, Boucherie H, Labarre J. Rapid identification of yeast proteins on two-dimensional gels. J. Biol. Chem.271(17), 10263–10270 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucherie H, Dujardin G, Kermorgant M et al. Two-dimensional protein map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: construction of a gene–protein index. Yeast11(7), 601–613 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildgruber RRG, Drews O, Parlar H, Görg A. Web-based two-dimensional database of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins using immobilized pH gradients from pH 6 to pH 12 and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Proteomics2(6), 727–732 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vido K, Spector D, Lagniel G et al. A proteome analysis of the cadmium response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.276(11), 8469–8474 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Bro C, Regenberg B, Lagniel G et al. Transcriptional, proteomic, and metabolic responses to lithium in galactose-grown yeast cells. J. Biol. Chem.278(34), 32141–32149 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Godon C, Lagniel G, Lee J et al. The H2O2 stimulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.273(35), 22480–22489 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobel Hd, Lawrie L, Brul S et al. Parallel and comparative analysis of the proteome and transcriptome of sorbic acid-stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast18(15), 1413–1428 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res.2(1), 43–50 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J, Sun J, Yu W et al. Global proteome discovery using an online three-dimensional LC-MS/MS. J. Proteome Res.4(3), 801–808 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt JM, Robertson DHL, Gaskell SJ et al. Stable isotope labelling in vivo as an aid to protein identification in peptide mass fingerprinting. Proteomics2(2), 157–163 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt JM, Petty J, Riba-Garcia I et al. Dynamics of protein turnover, a missing dimension in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(8), 579–591 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger SJ, Lee SW, Anderson GA et al. High-throughput global peptide proteomic analysis by combining stable isotope amino acid labeling and data-dependent multiplexed-MS/MS. Anal. Chem.74(19), 4994–5000 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter TC, Yang L, Zhu H et al. Peptide mass mapping constrained with stable isotope-tagged peptides for identification of protein mixtures. Anal. Chem.73(20), 4891–4902 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersen JS, Mann M. Organellar proteomics: turning inventories into insights. EMBO J.7(9), 874–879 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Sickmann A, Reinders J, Wagner Y et al. The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(23), 13207–13212 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokisch H, Scharfe C, Camp DG et al. Integrative analysis of the mitochondrial proteome in yeast. PLoS Biol.2(6), e160 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westermann B, Neupert W. ‘Omics’ of the mitochondrion. Nat. Biotechnol.21(3), 239–240 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Agarwal S, Heyman JA et al. Subcellular localization of the yeast proteome. Genes Dev.16(6), 707–719 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh W-K, Falvo JV, Gerke LC et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature425(6959), 686–691 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross-Macdonald P, Coelho PSR, Roemer T et al. Large-scale analysis of the yeast genome by transposon tagging and gene disruption. Nature402(6760), 413–418 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlmeier S, Kastaniotis AJ, Hiltunen JK, Bergmann U. The yeast mitochondrial proteome, a study of fermentative and respiratory growth. J. Biol. Chem.279(6), 3956–3979 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drawid A, Gerstein MA. Bayesian system integrating expression data with sequence patterns for localizing proteins: comprehensive application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol.301(4), 1059–1075 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Stasyk T, Huber LA. Zooming in: fractionation strategies in proteomics. Proteomics4(12), 3704–3716 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders J, Zahedi RP, Pfanner N, Meisinger C, Sickmann A. Toward the complete yeast mitochondrial proteome: multidimensional separation techniques for mitochondrial proteomics. J. Proteome Res.5(7), 1543–1554 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthi A, Hopper AK. Genome-wide screen for inner nuclear membrane protein targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics170(4), 1553–1560 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarre C, Degand H, Bennett KL, Crawford JS, Boutry EMM. Subproteomics: identification of plasma membrane proteins from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics2(12), 1706–1714 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delom F, Szponarski W, Sommerer N et al. The plasma membrane proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its response to the antifungal calcofluor. Proteomics6(10), 3029–3039 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mian FA, Kuenzi MT, Halvorson HO. Studies on mitochondrial membrane proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different degrees of glucose repression. J. Bacteriol.115(3), 976–881 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Segal SP, Dunckley T, Parker R. Sbp1p affects translational repression and decapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.26(13), 5129–5130 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Yu X, Xu D, Cheng Q. Label-free detection methods for protein microarrays. Proteomics6(20), 5493–5503 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(10), 1487–1502 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs RE, Knierman MD, Gelfanova V, Butler JP, Hale JE. Comprehensive label-free method for the relative quantification of proteins from biological samples. J. Proteome Res.4(4), 1442–1450 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr A. Absolute proteomics. Nat. Met.4(3), 195–195 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, English AM. Quantitative analysis of the yeast proteome by incorporation of isotopically labeled leucine. J. Proteome Res.1(4), 345–350 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker KC, Patterson D, Williamson B et al. Depth of proteome issues: a yeast isotope-coded affinity tag reagent study. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(7), 625–659 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Washburn MP, Ulaszek R, Deciu C, Schieltz DM, Yates JR. Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology. Anal. Chem.74(7), 1650–1657 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zybailov BL, Florens L, Washburn MP. Quantitative shotgun proteomics using a protease with broad specificity and normalized spectral abundance factors. Mol. Biosyst.3, 354–360 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boucherie H. Protein synthesis during transition and stationary phases under glucose limitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol.161(1), 385–392 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbeck J, Blomberg A. Metabolic and regulatory changes associated with growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in 1.4M NaCl. Evidence for osmotic induction of glycerol dissimilation via the dihydroxyacetone pathway. J. Biol. Chem.272(9), 5544–5554 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Ranish JA, Watts JD, Aebersold R. Quantitative proteome analysis by solid-phase isotope tagging and mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol.20(5), 512–515 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Steen H, Gygi SP. Protein profiling with cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag (cICAT) reagents: the yeast salinity stress response. Mol. Cell. Proteomics2(11), 1198–1204 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husnika JI, Volschenkb H, Bauerc J et al. Metabolic engineering of malolactic wine yeast. Metab. Eng.8(4), 315–323 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ghaemmaghami S, Huh W-K, Bower K et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature425(6959), 737–741 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köcher T, Superti-Furga G. Mass spectrometry-based functional proteomics: from molecular machines to protein networks. Nat. Met.4(10), 807–815 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandta MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab. Eng.2(1), 69–77 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Overkamp KM, Bakker BM, Kotter P et al. Metabolic engineering of glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68(6), 2814–2821 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Bertone P, Snyder M. Prospects and challenges in proteomics. Plant Physiol.138(2), 560–562 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science274(5287), 546–567 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito T, Ota K, Kubota H et al. Roles for the two-hybrid system in exploration of the yeast protein interactome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(8), 561–566 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields S, Song O-K. A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions. Nature340(6230), 245–246 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwikowski B, Uetz P, Fields S. A network of protein–protein interactions in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol.18(12), 1257–1261 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature415(6868), 180–183 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature422(6928), 198–207 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranish JA, Yi EC, Leslie DM et al. The study of macromolecular complexes by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Gen.33(3), 349–355 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen S-H et al. Dynamic changes in protein–protein interaction and protein phosphorylation probed with amine-reactive isotope tag. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(9), 1358–1369 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synowsky SA, van den Heuvel RHH, Mohammed S, Pim Pijnappel WWM, Heck AJR. Probing genuine strong interactions and post-translational modifications in the heterogeneous yeast exosome protein complex. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(9), 1581–1592 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods24(3), 218–229 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions. Nature417(6887), 399–403 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature440(7084), 637–643 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins SR, Kemmeren P, Zhao X-C et al. Towards a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(3), 439–450 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu S, Vlasblom J, Emili A, Greenblatt J, Wodak SJ. Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics7(6), 944–960 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlin DT, Chait BT. Analysis of phosphorylated proteins and peptides by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.5(5), 591–602 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda Y, Huang K, Cross FR, Cowburn D, Chait BT. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96(12), 6591–6596 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagoev B, Ong S-E, Kratchmarova I, Mann M. Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.22(9), 1139–1145 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol.21(8), 921–926 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belle A, Tanay A, Bitincka L, Shamir R, O’Shea EK. Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103(35), 13004–13009 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JR, Gilchrist A, Howell KE, Bergeron JJ. Proteomics of organelles and large cellular structures. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.6(9), 702–714 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(3), 310–327 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol.20(3), 301–305 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Castillo L, Hughes TR. Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes? Genetics176(1), 7–14 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrow MP, Burkitt WI, Derrick PJ. Principles of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry and its application in structural biology. Analyst130, 18–28 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLafferty FW, Horna DM, Breukera K et al. Electron capture dissociation of gaseous multiply charged ions by Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spect.12(3), 245–249 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen ON. Modification-specific proteomics: characterization of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.8(1), 33–41 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Makarov A. Electrostatic axially harmonic orbital trapping: a high-performance technique of mass analysis. Anal. Chem.72(6), 1156–1162 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, de Godoy LMF, Li G et al. Parts per million mass accuracy on an orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(12), 2010–2021 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Q, Noll RJ, Li H et al. The orbitrap: a new mass spectrometer. J. Mass Spectrom.40(4), 430–443 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syka JEP, Coon JJ, Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(26), 9528–9533 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaney DL, McAlister GC, Wirtala M et al. Supplemental activation method for high-efficiency electron-transfer dissociation of doubly protonated peptide precursors. Anal. Chem.79(2), 477–485 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall DA, Zhu H, Zhu X et al. Regulation of gene expression by a metabolic enzyme. Science306(5695), 482–484 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingras A-C, Gstaiger M, Raught B, Aebersold R. Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8(8), 645–654 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessani N, Cravatt BF. The development and application of methods for activity-based protein profiling. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.8(1), 54–59 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam GC, Sorensen EJ, Cravatt BF. Chemical strategies for functional proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(10), 781–790 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karas M, Bahr U. Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Trends Anal. Chem.9, 321–325 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK, Wong SF, Whitehouse CM. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science246(4926), 64–71 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wijk KJ. Challenges and prospects of plant proteomics. Plant Physiol.126(2), 501–508 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domon B, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science312(5771), 212–217 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbarda MJ, Cohen P. On target with a new mechanism for the regulation of protein phosphorylation. Trends Biochem. Sci.18(5), 172–177 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Witze ES, Old WM, Resing KA, Ahn NG. Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nat. Met.4(10), 798–806 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annan RS, Huddleston MJ, Verma R, Deshaies RJ, Carr SA. A multidimensional electrospray MS-based approach to phosphopeptide mapping. Anal. Chem.73(3), 393–404 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch J, Hansen KC, Burlingame AL, Matthay MA. Proteomics: current techniques and potential applications to lung disease. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.287(1), L1–23 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köcher T, Allmaier G, Wilm M. Nanoelectrospray-based detection and sequencing of substoichiometric amounts of phosphopeptides in complex mixtures. J. Mass Spect.38(2), 131–137 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Canas B, Lopez-Ferrer D, Ramos-Fernandez A, Camafeita E, Calvo E. Mass spectrometry technologies for proteomics. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic.4(4), 295–320 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf-Yadlin A, Hautaniemi S, Lauffenburger DA, White FM. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(14), 5860–5865 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin RD, Griffiths JR, Leverentz MK et al. Multiple reaction monitoring to identify sites of protein phosphorylation with high sensitivity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(8), 1134–1144 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson L, Hunter CL. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(4), 573–588 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin RD, Evans CA, Whetton AD. Relative quantification in proteomics: new approaches for biochemistry. Trends Biochem. Sci.31(8), 473–484 (2006).
   Google Scholar