Analysis of organelles within the nervous system: impact on brain and organelle functions

References

• Au CE, Bell AW, Gilchrist A et al. Organellar proteomics to create the cell map. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.19, 376–385 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dreger M. Proteome analysis at the level of subcellular structures. Eur. J. Biochem.270, 589–599 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hearing VJ. Biogenesis of pigment granules: a sensitive way to regulate melanocyte function. J. Dermatol. Sci.37, 3–14 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreger M. Subcellular proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev.22, 27–56 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber LA, Pfaller K, Vietor I. Organelle proteomics: implications for subcellular fractionation in proteomics. Circ. Res.92, 962–968 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribl F, Marcus K, Bringmann G et al. Proteomics of the human brain: sub-proteomes might hold the key to handle brain complexity. J. Neural Transm.113, 1041–1054 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountoulakis M. Application of proteomics technologies in the investigation of the brain. Mass Spectrom. Rev.23, 231–258 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountoulakis M, Hardmeier R, Hoger H, Lubec G. Postmortem changes in the level of brain proteins. Exp. Neurol.167, 86–94 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham JM, Rickwood D. Subcellular Fractionation: A Practical Approach. Graham JM, Rickwood D (Eds). Oxford University Press, NY, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Yates JR III, Gilchrist A, Howell KE, Bergeron JJ. Proteomics of organelles and large cellular structures. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.6, 702–714 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquali C, Fialka I, Huber LA. Subcellular fractionation, electromigration analysis and mapping of organelles. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl.722, 89–102 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittaker VP. The application of subcellular fractionation techniques to the study of brain function. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.15, 39–96 (1965).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pertoft H. Fractionation of cells and subcellular particles with Percoll. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods44, 1–30 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolton VN, Braude PR. Preparation of human spermatozoa for in vitro fertilization by isopycnic centrifugation on self-generating density gradients. Arch. Androl.13, 167–176 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushimoto T, Basrur V, Valencia J et al. A model for melanosome biogenesis based on the purification and analysis of early melanosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 10698–10703 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howell KE, Gruenberg J, Ito A, Palade GE. Immuno-isolation of subcellular components. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res.270, 77–90 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luzio JP, Mullock BM, Branch WJ, Richardson PJ. Immunoaffinity techniques for the purification and functional assessment of subcellular organelles. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res.270, 91–100 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson PJ, Luzio JP. Immunoaffinity purification of membrane fractions from mammalian cells. Subcell. Biochem.12, 221–241 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler J, Jung S, Niedner-Schatteburg G, Friauf E, Nothwang HG. Enrichment of integral membrane proteins from small amounts of brain tissue. J. Neural Transm.113, 995–1013 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tribl F, Gerlach M, Marcus K et al. “Subcellular proteomics” of neuromelanin granules isolated from the human brain. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4, 945–957 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JM, Takizawa T, Vandre DD, Burry RW. Ultrasmall immunogold particles: important probes for immunocytochemistry. Microsc. Res. Tech.42, 13–23 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagshaw RD, Mahuran DJ, Callahan JW. Lysosomal membrane proteomics and biogenesis of lysosomes. Mol. Neurobiol.32, 27–42 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray JW, Bananis E, Wolkoff AW. Immunofluorescence microchamber technique for characterizing isolated organelles. Anal. Biochem.305, 55–67 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lottspeich F. Proteome analysis: a pathway to the functional analysis of proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.38, 2476–2492 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kellner R, Lottspeich F, Meyer HE. Microcharacterization of Proteins. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Goodlett DR. Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem. Rev.101, 269–295 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature422, 198–207 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer HE, Hoffmann-Posorske E, Korte H, Heilmeyer LM Jr. Sequence analysis of phosphoserine-containing peptides. Modification for picomolar sensitivity. FEBS Lett.204, 61–66 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen MR, Roepstorff P. Mass spectrometric identification of proteins and characterization of their post-translational modifications in proteome analysis. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem.366, 677–690 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klose J. Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis of mouse tissues. A novel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik26, 231–243 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem.250, 4007–4021 (1975).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose J, Nock C, Herrmann M et al. Genetic analysis of the mouse brain proteome. Nat. Genet.30, 385–393 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaindl AM, Sifringer M, Zabel C et al. Acute and long-term proteome changes induced by oxidative stress in the developing brain. Cell Death Differ.13(7), 1097–1109 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palacino JJ, Sagi D, Goldberg MS et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in parkin-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem.279, 18614–18622 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoni V, Molloy M, Rabilloud T. Membrane proteins and proteomics: un amour impossible? Electrophoresis21, 1054–1070 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahedi RP, Meisinger C, Sickmann A. Two-dimensional benzyldimethyl-nhexadecylammonium chloride/SDS-PAGE for membrane proteomics. Proteomics5, 3581–3588 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartinger J, Stenius K, Hogemann D, Jahn R. 16-BAC/SDS-PAGE: a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis system suitable for the separation of integral membrane proteins. Anal. Biochem.240, 126–133 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helling S, Schmitt E, Joppich C et al. 2-D differential membrane proteome analysis of scarce protein samples. Proteomics6, 4506–4513 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribl F, Lohaus C, Dombert T et al. Towards multi-dimensional liquid chromatography separation of proteins using fluorescence and isotope-coded protein labeling for quantitative proteomics. Proteomics8(6), 1204–1211(2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR III. An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem.73, 5683–5690 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüking A, Cahill DJ, Mullner S. Protein biochips: a new and versatile platform technology for molecular medicine. Drug Discov. Today10, 789–794 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingren C, Borrebaeck CA. Antibody microarray analysis of directly labelled complex proteomes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19(1), 55–61 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusnezow W, Syagailo YV, Goychuk I, Hoheisel JD, Wild DG. Antibody microarrays: the crucial impact of mass transport on assay kinetics and sensitivity. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.6, 111–124 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusnezow W, Syagailo YV, Ruffer S et al. Optimal design of microarray immunoassays to compensate for kinetic limitations: theory and experiment. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5, 1681–1696 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertone P, Snyder M. Advances in functional protein microarray technology. FEBS J.272, 5400–5411 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong S-E, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol.1, 252–262 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu WW, Wang G, Baek SJ, Shen RF. Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel-or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF. J. Proteome Res.5, 651–658 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unlu M, Morgan ME, Minden JS. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis18, 2071–2077 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol.17, 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Kellermann J, Lottspeich F. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels. Proteomics5, 4–15 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Andersen JR, Nielsen PA et al. HysTag – a novel proteomic quantification tool applied to differential display analysis of membrane proteins from distinct areas of mouse brain. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3, 82–92 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3, 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese S, Reidegeld KA, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics7, 340–350 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1, 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. BioAnal. Chem.389, 1017–1031 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res.7, 51–61 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR III. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem.76, 4193–4201 (2004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarenko PV, Chelius D, Shaler TA. Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.74, 4741–4749 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen JS, Wilkinson CJ, Mayor T et al. Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling. Nature426, 570–574 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 6940–6945 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge DR, Dratz EA, Martin T et al. Absolute quantification of the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin by LC/MS/MS using proteolysis product peptides and synthetic peptide standards. Anal. Chem.75, 445–451 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkley TP, Watson R, Griffin JL, Dupree P, Lilley KS. Localization of organelle proteins by isotope tagging (LOPIT). Mol. Cell. Proteomics3, 1128–1134 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster LJ, de Hoog CL, Zhang Y et al. A mammalian organelle map by protein correlation profiling. Cell125, 187–199 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese S, Gronemeyer T, Ofman R et al. Proteomics characterization of mouse kidney peroxisomes by tandem mass spectrometry and protein correlation profiling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6, 2045–2057 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helenius A, Aebi M. Intracellular functions of N-linked glycans. Science291, 2364–2369 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helenius A, Aebi M. Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Biochem.73, 1019–1049 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian M, Sleat DE, Zheng H, Moore D, Lobel P. Proteomics analysis of serum from mutant mice reveals lysosomal proteins selectively transported by each of the two mannose 6-phosphate receptors. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7, 58–70 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita K, Hara-Kuge S, Ohkura T. Intracellular lectins associated with N-linked glycoprotein traffic. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1473, 147–160 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David V, Hochstenbach F, Rajagopalan S, Brenner MB. Interaction with newly synthesized and retained proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum suggests a chaperone function for human integral membrane protein IP90 (calnexin). J. Biol. Chem.268, 9585–9592 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sleat DE, Lobel P. Ligand binding specificities of the two mannose 6-phosphate receptors. J. Biol. Chem.272, 731–738 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakuraba H, Sawada M, Matsuzawa F et al. Molecular pathologies of and enzyme replacement therapies for lysosomal diseases. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets5, 401–413 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morelle W, Michalsky JC. The mass spectrometric analysis of glycoproteins and their glycan structures. Curr. Anal. Chem.1, 29–57 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Monzo A, Bonn GK, Guttman A. Lectin-immobilization strategies for affinity purification and separation of glycoconjugates. Trends Analyt. Chem.26, 423–432 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon N, Lis H. History of lectins: from hemagglutinins to biological recognition molecules. Glycobiology14, R53–R62 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert B. Advances in protein solubilisation for two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis20, 660–663 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers G, Lawrie L, Cash P, Murray GI. Proteomics: a new approach to the study of disease. J. Pathol.192, 280–288 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz PA, Hochstrasser DF, Appel RD. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics: current status and potential use in clinical chemistry. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.41, 1540–1551 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson P, Brinkmalm A, Karlsson G et al. Clinical mass spectrometry in neuroscience. Proteomics and peptidomics. Cell. Mol. Biol. (Noisy-le-grand)49, 681–688 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu CC, Yates JR III. The application of mass spectrometry to membrane proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.21, 262–267 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary J, Grant SG. Proteomics in postgenomic neuroscience: the end of the beginning. Nat. Neurosci.7, 440–445 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus K, Schmidt O, Schäfer H et al. Proteomics – application to the brain. Int. Rev. Neurobiol.61, 285–311 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paulson L, Persson R, Karlsson G et al. Proteomics and peptidomics in neuroscience. Experience of capabilities and limitations in a neurochemical laboratory. J. Mass Spectrom.40, 202–213 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhof TC. Synaptic vesicles: an organelle comes of age. Cell127, 671–673 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palkovits M. Topography of chemically identified neurons in the central nervous system: progress in 1977–1979. Med. Biol.58, 188–227 (1980).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salio C, Lossi L, Ferrini F, Merighi A. Neuropeptides as synaptic transmitters. Cell Tissue Res.326, 583–598 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudhof TC. Membrane fusion as a team effort. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 13541–13542 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudhof TC. The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.27, 509–547 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondeau F, Ritter B, Allaire PD et al. Tandem MS analysis of brain clathrin-coated vesicles reveals their critical involvement in synaptic vesicle recycling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 3833–3838 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burre J, Volknandt W. The synaptic vesicle proteome. J. Neurochem.101, 1448–1462 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamori S, Holt M, Stenius K et al. Molecular anatomy of a trafficking organelle. Cell127, 831–846 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burre J, Beckhaus T, Corvey C, et al. Synaptic vesicle proteins under conditions of rest and activation: analysis by 2-D difference gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis27, 3488–3496 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimazaki Y, Nishiki T, Omori A et al. Phosphorylation of 25-κDa synaptosome-associated protein. Possible involvement in protein kinase C-mediated regulation of neurotransmitter release. J. Biol. Chem.271, 14548–14553 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler J, Lewandrowski U, Sickmann A, Friauf E. Aqueous polymer two-phase systems for the proteomic analysis of plasma membranes from minute brain samples. J. Proteome Res.7, 432–442 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler J, Lewandrowski U, Sickmann A, Friauf E, Nothwang HG. Proteomic analysis of brain plasma membranes isolated by affinity two-phase partitioning. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5, 390–400 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen P, Li X, Sun Y et al. Proteomic analysis of rat hippocampal plasma membrane: characterization of potential neuronal-specific plasma membrane proteins. J. Neurochem.98, 1126–1140 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen PA, Olsen JV, Podtelejnikov AV et al. Proteomic mapping of brain plasma membrane proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4, 402–408 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang JH, Hanash S. Profiling of the cell surface proteome. Proteomics3, 1947–1954 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Y, Zhang W, Kho Y, Zhao Y. Proteomic analysis of integral plasma membrane proteins. Anal. Chem.76, 1817–1823 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan SD, Barondes SH. Affinity partitioning. A method for purification of proteins using specific polymer-ligands in aqueous polymer two-phase systems. J. Biol. Chem.250, 1484–1489 (1975).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan SD, Taylor P, Barondes SH. Affinity partitioning of acetylcholine receptor enriched membranes and their purification. Nature254, 441–443 (1975).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson A, Jergil B. The purification of membranes by affinity partitioning. FASEB J.9, 1304–1310 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy I, Mondal K, Gupta MN. Leveraging protein purification strategies in proteomics. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.849, 32–42 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Nielsen PA, Andersen JR, Mann M, Wisniewski JR. Quantitative proteomic profiling of membrane proteins from the mouse brain cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum using the HysTag reagent: mapping of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels. Brain Res.1134, 95–106 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm J, Mueller A, Hefti F, Rosenthal A. Molecular basis for catecholaminergic neuron diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 13891–13896 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokai L, Zharikova AD, Stevens SM Jr. Effect of chronic morphine exposure on the synaptic plasma-membrane subproteome of rats: a quantitative protein profiling study based on isotope-coded affinity tags and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom.40, 169–175 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercauteren FG, Flores G, Ma W et al. An organelle proteomic method to study neurotransmission-related proteins, applied to a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia. Proteomics7, 3569–3579 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia JY, Lamer S, Schumann M et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis of detergent-resistant membranes from chemical synapses: evidence for cholesterol as spatial organizer of synaptic vesicle cycling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5, 2060–2071 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siekevitz P. The postsynaptic density: a possible role in long-lasting effects in the central nervous system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA82, 3494–3498 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh MJ, Kuruc N. The postsynaptic density: constituent and associated proteins characterized by electrophoresis, immunoblotting, and peptide sequencing. J. Neurochem.59, 667–678 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu SH, Cheng HH, Huang SY, Yiu PC, Chang YC. Studying the protein organization of the postsynaptic density by a novel solid phase-and chemical cross-linking-based technology. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5, 1019–1032 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang CW, Peng SC, Cheng WY et al. Studying the protein–protein interactions in the postsynaptic density by means of immunoabsorption and chemical crosslinking. Proteomics Clin. Appl.1, 1499–1512 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheng M, Kim E. The Shank family of scaffold proteins. J. Cell. Sci.113(Pt 11), 1851–1856 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Sheng M. PDZ domain proteins of synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.5, 771–781 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundelfinger ED, Boeckers TM, Baron MK, Bowie JU. A role for zinc in postsynaptic density asSAMbly and plasticity? Trends Biochem. Sci.31, 366–373 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen K, Teruel MN, Subramanian K, Meyer T. CaMKIIb functions as an F-actin targeting module that localizes CaMKIIα/β heterooligomers to dendritic spines. Neuron21, 593–606 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng D, Hoogenraad CC, Rush J et al. Relative and absolute quantification of postsynaptic density proteome isolated from rat forebrain and cerebellum. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5, 1158–1170 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosemeci A, Makusky AJ, Jankowska-Stephens E et al. Composition of the synaptic PSD-95 complex. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6, 1749–1760 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Hornshaw MP, van Minnen J et al. Organelle proteomics of rat synaptic proteins: correlation-profiling by isotope-coded affinity tagging in conjunction with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to reveal post-synaptic density specific proteins. J. Proteome Res.4, 725–733 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosemeci A, Tao-Cheng JH, Vinade L, Jaffe H. Preparation of postsynaptic density fraction from hippocampal slices and proteomic analysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.339, 687–694 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng J, Kim MJ, Cheng D et al. Semiquantitative proteomic analysis of rat forebrain postsynaptic density fractions by mass spectrometry. J. Biol. Chem.279, 21003–21011 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosemeci A, Tao-Cheng JH, Vinade L et al. Glutamate-induced transient modification of the postsynaptic density. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 10428–10432 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toni N, Buchs PA, Nikonenko I et al. Remodeling of synaptic membranes after induction of long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci.21, 6245–6251 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunaevsky A, Tashiro A, Majewska A, Mason C, Yuste R. Developmental regulation of spine motility in the mammalian central nervous system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96, 13438–13443 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engert F, Bonhoeffer T. Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Nature399, 66–70 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckby LE, Mummery R, Crompton MR, Beesley PW, Empson RM. Comparison of neuroplastin and synaptic marker protein expression in acute and cultured organotypic hippocampal slices from rat. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res.150, 1–7 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen K, Meyer T. Dynamic control of CaMKII translocation and localization in hippocampal neurons by NMDA receptor stimulation. Science284, 162–166 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giese KP, Fedorov NB, Filipkowski RK, Silva AJ. Autophosphorylation at Thr286 of the alpha calcium-calmodulin kinase II in LTP and learning. Science279, 870–873 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgersma Y, Fedorov NB, Ikonen S et al. Inhibitory autophosphorylation of CaMKII controls PSD association, plasticity, and learning. Neuron36, 493–505 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trinidad JC, Specht CG, Thalhammer A, Schoepfer R, Burlingame AL. Comprehensive identification of phosphorylation sites in postsynaptic density preparations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5, 914–922 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matus A. Actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines. Science290, 754–758 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toni N, Buchs PA, Nikonenko I, Bron CR, Muller D. LTP promotes formation of multiple spine synapses between a single axon terminal and a dendrite. Nature402, 421–425 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribl F, Marcus K, Meyer HE et al. Subcellular proteomics reveals neuromelanin granules to be a lysosome-related organelle. J. Neural Transm.113, 741–749 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu ZZ, Valencia JC, Huang H et al. Comparative bioinformatics analyses and profiling of lysosome-related organelle proteomes. Int. J. Mass Spectrom.259, 147–160 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorow H, Tribl F, Halliday G et al. Neuromelanin in human dopamine neurons: comparison with peripheral melanins and relevance to Parkinson’s disease. Prog. Neurobiol.75, 109–124 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch E, Graybiel AM, Agid YA. Melanized dopaminergic neurons are differentially susceptible to degeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Nature334, 345–348 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasano M, Bergamasco B, Lopiano L. Modifications of the iron-neuromelanin system in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem.96, 909–916 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasano M, Giraudo S, Coha S, Bergamasco B, Lopiano L. Residual substantia nigra neuromelanin in Parkinson’s disease is cross-linked to α-synuclein. Neurochem. Int.42, 603–606 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday GM, Ophof A, Broe M et al. α-synuclein redistributes to neuromelanin lipid in the substantia nigra early in Parkinson’s disease. Brain128(Pt 11), 2654–2664 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribl F, Arzberger T, Riederer P, Gerlach M. Tyrosinase is not detected in human catecholaminergic neurons by immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis. J. Neural Transm. Suppl.51–55 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Della Valle MC, Sleat DE, Sohar I et al. Demonstration of lysosomal localization for the mammalian ependymin-related protein using classical approaches combined with a novel density shift method. J. Biol. Chem.281, 35436–35445 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrow TA, Hopkin RJ, Leslie ND, Tinkle BT, Grabowski GA. Enzyme reconstitution/replacement therapy for lysosomal storage diseases. Curr. Opin. Pediatr.19, 628–635 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journet A, Chapel A, Kieffer S, Roux F, Garin J. Proteomic analysis of human lysosomes: application to monocytic and breast cancer cells. Proteomics2, 1026–1040 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleat DE, Zheng H, Qian M, Lobel P. Identification of sites of mannose 6-phosphorylation on lysosomal proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5, 686–701 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sleat DE, Lackland H, Wang Y et al. The human brain mannose 6-phosphate glycoproteome: a complex mixture composed of multiple isoforms of many soluble lysosomal proteins. Proteomics5, 1520–1532 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sleat DE, Donnelly RJ, Lackland H et al. Association of mutations in a lysosomal protein with classical late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Science277, 1802–1805 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naureckiene S, Sleat DE, Lackland H et al. Identification of HE1 as the second gene of Niemann-Pick C disease. Science290, 2298–2301 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao L, Zabel C, Wacker MA, Nebrich G et al. Estimation of the mtDNA mutation rate in aging mice by proteome analysis and mathematical modeling. Exp. Gerontol.41, 11–24 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harman D. The biologic clock: the mitochondria? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.20, 145–147 (1972).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnane AW, Marzuki S, Ozawa T, Tanaka M. Mitochondrial DNA mutations as an important contributor to ageing and degenerative diseases. Lancet1, 642–645 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapira AH, Cooper JM, Dexter D et al. Mitochondrial complex I deficiency in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem.54, 823–827 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AC, Cartwright LS, Ramsden DB. Parkinson’s disease: the first common neurological disease due to auto-intoxication? QJM98, 215–226 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Davis J, Zhu D et al. Identification of novel proteins affected by rotenone in mitochondria of dopaminergic cells. BMC Neurosci.8, 67 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Li W, Liu Y et al. Mitochondrial proteomic analysis and characterization of the intracellular mechanisms of bis(7)-tacrine in protecting against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity in primary cultured neurons. J. Proteome Res.6, 2435–2446 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H, Carlier PR, Ho WL et al. Effects of bis(7)-tacrine, a novel anti-Alzheimer’s agent, on rat brain AChE. Neuroreport10, 789–793 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiwatwattana N, Kumar A. Organelle DB: a cross-species database of protein localization and function. Nucleic Acids Res.33, D598–D604 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiwatwattana N, Landau CM, Cope GJ, Harp GA, Kumar A. Organelle DB: an updated resource of eukaryotic protein localization and function. Nucleic Acids Res.35, D810–D814 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierleoni A, Martelli PL, Fariselli P, Casadio R. eSLDB: eukaryotic subcellular localization database. Nucleic Acids Res.35, D208–D212 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierleoni A, Martelli PL, Fariselli P, Casadio R. BaCelLo: a balanced subcellular localization predictor. Bioinformatics22, E408–E416 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimko N, Liu L, Lang BF, Burger G. GOBASE: the organelle genome database. Nucleic Acids Res.29, 128–132 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domon B, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science312, 212–217 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist A, Au CE, Hiding J et al., Quantitative proteomics analysis of the secretory pathway. Cell127, 1265–1281 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burre J, Beckhaus T, Schagger H et al. Analysis of the synaptic vesicle proteome using three gel-based protein separation techniques. Proteomics6, 6250–6262 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar